Was Sampson wrong?

David B. Redwine, David Byron Redwine
Fertility and Sterility · 2002 · vol. 78(4) , pp. 686–693 · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03329-0 · PMID:12372441 · W2151903246
review OA: bronze CC0 ⤵ 62 in-corpus citations
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10 ⓘ

I cannot summarize this paper as no abstract or further information is available.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Animals Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometrium Endometrium Endometrium Female Humans Menstruation Menstruation Disturbances Transplantation, Autologous Transplantation, Heterologous

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (100)

Cited by (50)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:13:01.552487+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK