Surgical diminished ovarian reserve after endometrioma cystectomy versus idiopathic DOR: comparison of in vitro fertilization outcome

Audrey Roustan, A. Roustan, Roustan A, Jeanne Perrin, Perrin J, Mathias Debals-Gonthier, Debals-Gonthier M, M. Debals-Gonthier, Paulmyer-Lacroix O, Odile Paulmyer-Lacroix, Odile Paulmyer‐Lacroix, Agostini A, Aubert Agostini, Blandine Courbiere, Blandine Courbière
Human Reproduction · 2015 · vol. 30(4) , pp. 840–847 · doi:10.1093/humrep/dev029 · PMID:25740883 · W2146827552
article OA: bronze CC0 ⤵ 55 in-corpus citations
📄 Open PDF View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-06 ⓘ

Women with diminished ovarian reserve after endometrioma cystectomy had significantly lower IVF pregnancy and live birth rates compared to those with idiopathic diminished ovarian reserve.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Does the live birth rate after IVF depend on the etiology of diminished ovarian reserve (DOR)? SUMMARY ANSWER: IVF outcome and live birth rate are significantly impaired in women with DOR caused by a previous cystectomy for endometrioma compared with women with idiopathic DOR. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The safety of the surgical treatment of endometriomas is being discussed in terms of damage to ovarian reserve. Several studies have reported a poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation and a significantly impaired IVF outcome in women with DOR consecutive to an endometrioma cystectomy compared with women with tubal factor infertility. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Retrospective case-control study conducted in women aged under 40 treated in our Reproductive Medicine Center between January 2010 and January 2014 for a DOR defined by anti-Müllerian hormone level <2 ng/ml. Two groups of patients were selected: group A included patients with a DOR diagnosed after cystectomy(s) for endometrioma(s), group B included patients with an idiopathic DOR. In each group, subgroups of patients 'poor ovarian responders', based on the ESHRE criteria ('Bologna criteria'), have been established. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: A total of 51 patients in group A were matched to 116 patients in group B, representing respectively 125 and 243 IVF cycles. Among them, 39 patients in group A and 78 patients in group B validated strictly by the Bologna criteria, representing 99 and 189 IVF cycles, respectively. Each patient underwent a controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IVF with fresh embryo transfer. Primary end-point was the live birth rate. Secondary end-points were the number of retrieved oocytes, fertilization rate, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, spontaneous abortion rate and cycle cancelation rate. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Significantly lower pregnancy (11.2% in group A versus 20.6% in group B, P = 0.02) and live birth (7.2 versus 16.9% respectively, P = 0.01) rates per cycle were assessed in women in group A compared with women in group B. The same results were obtained in the Bologna criteria subgroup analysis with a significantly lower pregnancy (9.1 versus 20.1%, P = 0.016) and live birth (5.1 versus 15.3%, P = 0.001) rates per cycle in women in subgroup A compared with women in subgroup B. Patients in group A required significantly higher gonadotrophins doses (2881 IU ± 1111 versus 2526 IU ± 795, P = 0.005), longer ovarian stimulation (10.6 Days ± 2.8 versus 9.9 Days ± 2.4, P = 0.019) and higher cancelation rate for poor response (12 versus 6.2%, P = 0.05). Despite a mean number of retrieved oocytes similar with the group B (5.4 ± 3.1 and 5.1 ± 3.2, NS), and a significantly higher fertilization rate (65.7 versus 47.2%, P < 0.001), women in group A showed a significantly lower implantation rate (7.2 versus 13.5%, P = 0.03). Abortion rate, ectopic pregnancy rate and multiple pregnancy rate were similar in both groups. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Data were collected retrospectively using the database of our Department. Sample size is relatively small but our study provides statistically significant evidence that the chances of IVF success are decreased in women with DOR after cystectomy for endometrioma. Further larger series are needed to confirm these findings. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: To our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating IVF outcome in patients with DOR after cystectomy(s) for endometrioma(s) versus in patients with an idiopathic DOR. In addition to the risk of damaging ovarian reserve, we hypothesize that endometrioma surgery would not have qualitative benefits on results in IVF in patients with DOR. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The authors have no competing interests to declare.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisendometriomainfertility

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometrium Ovarian Reserve Adult Birth Weight Case-Control Studies Embryo Transfer Embryo Transfer Endometriosis Endometrium Female Fertilization in Vitro Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Humans Ovulation Induction Ovulation Induction Pregnancy Pregnancy Outcome Pregnancy Rate

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (56)

Cited by (50)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-20T09:27:46.357103+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:17:58.238279+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK