Length of Menstrual Cycle and Risk of Endometriosis

Ming Wei, Wei M, Yanfei Cheng, Cheng Y, Huaien Bu, Bu H, Zhao Y, Ye Zhao, Zhao W, Wenli Zhao
Medicine · 2016 · vol. 95(9) , pp. e2922 · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000002922 · PMID:26945395 · PMC4782879 · W2292913502
review OA: gold CC0 ⤵ 32 in-corpus citations
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This meta-analysis found that shorter menstrual cycles (≤27 days) increase the risk of endometriosis, while longer cycles (≥29 days) decrease the risk.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-09 · read from full text ⓘ

This meta-analysis synthesized case–control studies published from 1993 to July 2014 that examined the relationship between menstrual cycle length and surgically confirmed endometriosis, including 11 eligible studies (3392 cases and 5006 controls) with odds ratios extracted and pooled using fixed- and random-effects models plus heterogeneity, sensitivity, and publication-bias assessments. The pooled results reported that women with menstrual cycle length ≤27 days (SEQ27) had increased endometriosis risk (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.05–1.43), while those with cycle length ≥29 days (LEQ29) had lower risk (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48–0.96), and sensitivity analyses suggested robustness, with one study identified as a key source of heterogeneity. A major caveat is that heterogeneity persisted across studies and menstrual cycle length intervals were not uniform, and the analysis included only English-language case–control evidence with variable age reporting and cycle categorization. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it meta-analyzes how menstrual cycle length (≤27 vs ≥29 days) is associated with endometriosis risk.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Endometriosis is a complex disease that affects a large number of women worldwide and may cause pain and infertility. To systematically review published studies evaluating the relationship between menstrual cycle length and risk of endometriosis. We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE in databases in July 2014 using the keywords "case-control studies," "epidemiologic determinants," "risk factors," "menstrual cycle," "menstrual length," "menstrual character," and "endometriosis." We included case-control studies published in English that investigated cases of surgically confirmed endometriosis and examined the relationship between endometriosis risk and menstrual cycle. Eleven articles that met the inclusion criteria included data of 3392 women with endometriosis and 5006 controls. Fixed-effects and random-effects models were used for the evaluation. For the association of risk of endometriosis and menstrual cycle length shorter than or equal to 27 days (SEQ27) or length longer than or equal to 29 days (LEQ29), the odds ratio was 1.22 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-1.43) and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.48-0.96), respectively. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that menstrual cycle length SEQ27 increase the risk of endometriosis and cycle length LEQ29 decrease the risk.
Full text 12,457 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 5 sections · click to expand

Intro

Endometriosis is a complex gynecologic disorder characterized by benign proliferation of ectopic endometrial glands and stroma in the peritoneal cavity, with dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, and infertility being typical symptoms. 1 , 2 It affects approximately 10% to 15% of women of reproductive age and as many as 50% of women with infertility. 3 Genetic predisposition and environmental factors are considered to be closely associated with the development of endometriosis. 4 – 7 However, the pathogenesis of this disease is currently not very clear. Three main theories used to explain the manifestations and invasion are the retrograde menstruation theory, Müllerian metaplasia theory, and lymphatic spread theory. 8 Many studies have surveyed the risk factors associated with the disease. It has been shown that age, race, body mass index, alcohol usage, cigarette smoking, and menstrual characters (such as the length and regularity of menstrual cycles, intensity of menstrual flow, and dysmenorrhea) are associated with the incidence of endometriosis. 9 – 12 Menstrual cycle characteristics affecting the frequency of exposure to menstruation may be related to the incidence of endometriosis. 13 Thus, several observational studies and a meta-analysis have provided some evidence that early age at menarche increases the risk of endometriosis. 14 , 15 The length of the menstrual cycle varies greatly among women (ranging from 21 to 35 days), with 28 days designated as the average length. 16 Accordingly, 28 days was used as the cut-off value for group assignment in a number of studies relevant to endometriosis. 17 – 22 We placed demarcation points at 27 and 29 days and defined menstrual cycle length shorter than or equal to 27 days as SEQ27 and longer than or equal to 29 days as LEQ29. The majority of observational studies have examined the relationship between menstrual cycle length, 1 of the menstrual characteristics, and endometriosis, and some have found an association between a shorter menstrual cycle and the incidence of this disease. 20 – 23 On the contrary, Sangi-Haghpeykar's study 24 showed that women with long cycle lengths were 1.8 times more likely to develop endometriosis than those with short cycle lengths. Dramatically, some studies 11 , 23 , 25 did not find any significant correlation between short menstrual cycle length and endometriosis at all. Therefore, the association between menstrual cycle length and endometriosis needs further confirmed. The aim of the present study is to perform a meta-analysis to examine the association between menstrual cycle length and endometriosis.

Methods

A systematic search was performed in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases for all case–control studies published between January 1993 and July 2014 using the following keywords: “Case–control studies,” “epidemiologic determinants,” “risk factors,” “menstrual cycle,” “menstrual length,” “menstrual character,” and “endometriosis.” Reference lists of selected publications were then searched manually by 1 of the authors to identify additional relevant studies. Two authors reviewed the papers and independently selected eligible articles for the systematic review. Studies were included if they investigated cases of surgically confirmed endometriosis; examined the relationship between endometriosis risk and menstrual cycle; were case–control studies; and were full-length articles published in English. Only original publications were included; conference abstracts and dissertations were excluded. Data were extracted independently by 2 investigators, and discrepancies were resolved by discussion. The following details were collected: first author's last name, year of publication, country of origin, study design, number of subjects, age, length of menstrual cycle in days, and odds ratios (ORs) of endometriosis and corresponding confidence intervals (CIs). The quality of primary studies was evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) according to 3 criteria: participant selection, comparability of study groups, and assessment of exposure. 26 ORs and 95% CIs for menstrual cycle length and endometriosis were calculated in a random-effects model and a fixed-effects model when appropriate. Both the Cochran Q statistic to test for heterogeneity and the I 2 statistic to quantify the proportion of the total variation due to heterogeneity were calculated. A P value of more than the nominal level of 0.10 for the Q statistic indicated a lack of heterogeneity across studies, allowing for the use of a fixed-effects model; otherwise, the random-effects model was used. To explore sources of heterogeneity across studies, subgroup analysis was performed. Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the stability of results. All statistical analyses were performed with the RevMan 5.3 software.

Results

Of the 631 reports initially identified from the database search, 603 articles were excluded after carefully reviewing the titles and abstracts because of low relevance to the present study (Figure 1 ). Among the 28 remaining articles, 17 more were excluded after an in-depth examination for the following reasons: 7 were not case–control studies, 7 did not mention menstrual cycle, 2 only presented mean values and not numbers of subjects, and 1 had similarities with 1 of the selected reports. Thus, only 11 studies fulfilled the predefined entry criteria and were ultimately selected for meta-analysis. Flow diagram illustrating the study selection process. Table 1 summarizes the 11 case–control studies selected for meta-analysis. Numbers of subjects in the studies published between 1993 and 2014 ranged from 186 to 2777, and there were 3392 cases of surgically diagnosed endometriosis and 5006 controls (Table 1 ). 18 – 22 , 24 , 25 , 27 – 30 Fortunately, we received the original data from one author of study 22 and used them in data analysis. The studies were conducted in Italy (n = 4), the United States (n = 2), Canada (n = 2), Australia (n = 1), Malaysia (n = 1), and Iran (n = 1). Subjects were generally younger than 55 years, 18 – 21 , 28 , 29 although women up to 64 years old were included in 1 study. 24 Four studies 22 , 25 , 27 , 30 did not provide the subjects’ age explicitly but used age ranges. Reports differed with respect to the description of menstrual cycle. Five studies described menstrual cycle as “regular” or “irregular,” 19 , 22 , 27 , 29 , 30 and 2 of them did not mention the duration. 29 , 30 Nine studies 18 – 22 , 24 , 25 , 27 , 28 used clearly defined intervals for the menstrual cycle length but the intervals in different studies were not the same. Five studies 18 – 20 , 22 , 25 provided the numbers of women in case and control with the length SEQ27 and 5 studies 19 , 20 , 22 , 24 , 28 provided the cases numbers with the length LEQ29. Three studies used age-matched controls. 21 , 28 , 30 In particular, 1 study 28 utilized age-matched twins as case and control subjects, whereas another 18 employed 2 control groups: 100 controls who were friends of the patients with endometriosis and 98 medical controls (patients from the same medical practice with conditions other than endometriosis). Characteristics of the 11 Case–Control Studies Included in the Analysis The quality of the studies was assessed by 2 investigators using the NOS, a validated tool for evaluating observational and nonrandomized studies, and the results were scored from 4 to 8. In particular, 1 study 19 received a score of 8, 2 18 , 20 a score of 7, 3 21 , 25 , 28 a score of 6, 1 24 a score of 5, and the remaining 4 22 , 27 , 29 , 30 a score of 4 (Table 2 ). Quality of the Included Studies Assessed Using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale Women with menstrual cycle lengths SEQ27 were at an increased risk of developing endometriosis (OR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.05–1.43; Figure 2 ) and those with menstrual cycle lengths LEQ29 were at an approximately 32% lower risk of endometriosis (OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.48–0.96; Figure 3 ). Forest plot of ORs with 95% CIs for menstrual cycle length SEQ27 and risk for endometriosis. CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio. Forest plot of ORs with 95% CIs for menstrual cycle length LEQ29 and risk for endometriosis. CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio. There was heterogeneity among studies in overall comparisons. We assessed all of the comparison models by country, and study sample size (≤300 subjects or >300 subjects) to explore sources of heterogeneity across studies. However, none of these variables could explain the heterogeneity. In the sensitivity analysis, we repeat the meta-analysis by omitting each study 1 by 1 to exam the influence of each study on the pooled OR. The result proved that our results were reliable. In addition, when excluding 1 study 24 simultaneously, the I 2 significantly decreased from 79% to 49% which was not so high as before. Therefore, the study 24 was considered as the source of heterogeneity and finally excluded when analyzed. Funnel plots for the association between menstrual cycle length SEQ27 or menstrual cycle length LEQ29 and risk for endometriosis were shown in the Figures 4 and 5 . Visual inspection of funnel plot asymmetry was conducted to assess the potential publication bias. Obviously, no indication of asymmetry was observed in the funnel plots. Funnel plot for the association between menstrual cycle length SEQ27 and risk for endometriosis. Funnel plot for the association between menstrual cycle length LEQ29 and risk for endometriosis.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that menstrual cycle length SEQ27 increase the risk of endometriosis and length LEQ29 decrease the risk.

Discussion

The consistency of the results of this meta-analysis indicates that menstrual cycle length SEQ27 is inversely associated with the risk of endometriosis and menstrual cycle length LEQ29 decreases the risk. The retrograde bleeding hypothesis can be 1 explanation for these findings. Sampson's theory of retrograde menstruation, 31 which is supported by the anatomical distribution of endometriotic implants 32 and higher prevalence of the disease in women with obstructive Müllerian anomalies, is currently considered to describe the main causal mechanism of endometriosis. 15 , 33 A short menstrual cycle usually means an increased menstrual frequency and higher risk of exposure to menstruation. Menstrual cycle length SEQ27, which is shorter than average cycle length, could potentially increase the frequency and the risk of retrograde bleeding and finally increase the incidence of endometriosis. However, the cycle length LEQ29 influences the endometriosis in a contrary way. The other potential explanation for our study results may be the fact that endometrial-like tissues of short-cycle-length (SEQ27) women are at a relatively higher frequency of exposure to higher levels of estrogen than that of long-cycle-length women. Several studies have already found that the ectopic growth of endometrial-like tissue was depended upon sex steroid hormones 34 and local growth factors 35 such as insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) 36 or vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). 37 Commonly, short cycle length comes along with punctually ovulation and the estrogen level sharply increasing in a short period of time before ovulation. Estrogen has synergistic effects with IGF-1/VEGF and sometimes enhance the effects of IGF-1/VEGF on ectopic endometrial cells proliferation and mitosis, 38 which possibly ended with endometriosis. Consistent with our conclusion, some studies 20 – 23 concluded that short menstrual cycle length increases the risk of endometriosis. Oppositely, Sangi-Haghpeykar's study 24 draw a conclusion that long cycle length is a risk factor. The opposite conclusion may result from the differences in the subjects’ source population, race, geographical region, and age. In summary, findings of our study can be used to guide the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies of endometriosis in clinical practices. For instance, the artificial menstrual cycle can be tried to manage the development of endometriosis in terms of delaying the menstruation or ovulatory phase. There are some limitations in our studies: only studies published in English between 1993 and 2014 were included; and the number of included studies and the total sample size were relatively small. More well-designed studies should be conducted.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisinfertility

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Menstrual Cycle Case-Control Studies Endometriosis Female Humans Risk Factors

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (41)

Cited by (34)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-13T09:25:22.628771+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:21:13.485820+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK