Diagnosis of adenomyosis: a review.

The Journal of reproductive medicine · 2007 · vol. 52(3) , pp. 177–93 · PMID:17465285 · W186917150
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 53 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This review analyzes preoperative diagnostic methods for adenomyosis, finding transvaginal sonography suboptimal, magnetic resonance imaging superior for both diffuse and focal types, computed tomography poor, and myometrial biopsy useful but not routinely recommended.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

This article reviews the various preoperative diagnostic methods for uterine adenomyosis. MEDLINE and PubMed were searched using the keywords adenomyosis and adenomyosis diagnosis. Reviews, case-controlled studies and reports published from 1949 through March 2005 and written, or at least abstracted, in English were analyzed. Transvaginal sonography is superior to the transabdominal route, but its diagnostic sensitivity is still suboptimal, ranging from 50% to 87%. Magnetic resonance imaging is most effective for both diffuse and focal adenomyosis, with sensitivity and specificity that are comparable to or even better than those of sonography as it depicts contrasts between low-intensity lesions and surrounding tissue. Computed tomography has poor diagnostic value due to similar images portrayed by foci and normal myometrium. Myometrial biopsy of the posterior uterine wall, as pursued by some authorities in recent years, is superior to sonography, but its routine use is not recommended. Although various methods were added to the clinician's armamentarium over the last 2 decades, the preoperative diagnosis of adenomyosis remains challenging.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

mesh:D004715adenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Tomography, X-Ray Computed Ultrasonography Diagnostic Imaging Endometriosis Female Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures Sensitivity and Specificity Tomography, X-Ray Computed Ultrasonography

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

Cited by (50)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:15:00.519696+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK