CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL COMPARISON OF ADENOMYOSIS IN HYSTERECTOMY PATIENTS – A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

In: GLOBAL JOURNAL FOR RESEARCH ANALYSIS · 2019 · pp. 1–3 · doi:10.36106/gjra/0600459 · W2977925595
article OA: bronze CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This retrospective study compared clinical, radiological, and histopathological diagnoses of adenomyosis in hysterectomy patients, finding histopathology confirmed 100% of clinical and radiological cases.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND : Hysterectomy - The most commonly performed gynaecological surgery throughout the world AIMS AND OBJECTIVES :This study aims at comparing the clinical, radiological and histopathological diagnosis of adenomyosis in hysterectomy patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS : A retrospective study was done on the 120 hysterectomy specimens received from August 2018 – August 2019 at the Pathology department in Ahalia Diabetes hospital. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION :Our study shows 100% of the clinical and radiological cases of adenomyosis and combined leiomyoma with adenomyosis were diagnosed by the histopathological examination.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

adenomyosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (16)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK