Association Between Endometriosis and Preterm Birth in Women With Spontaneous Conception or Using Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies

review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 29 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite+body, 2026-06-24

This meta-analysis of cohort studies found endometriosis increased preterm birth risk for both spontaneous conception and ART pregnancies.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10 · read from full text

This systematic review and meta-analysis searched multiple databases through April 2017 and included nine cohort studies (1,496,715 pregnancies; 13,798 with endometriosis diagnosis) comparing preterm birth rates among pregnant women with versus without endometriosis, stratified by spontaneous conception or assisted reproductive technology (ART). The pooled analyses found that endometriosis was associated with increased preterm birth risk in both spontaneous conception (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.32–1.90) and ART (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.14–1.79), and that small for gestational age risk was also increased (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05–1.28), while intrauterine growth restriction and low birthweight/birthweight were not affected. A stated limitation is that confirmatory prospective studies evaluating relevant outcomes are needed. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it quantifies the association between endometriosis and preterm birth risk in both spontaneous conception and ART pregnancies.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ObjectiveTo perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the effect of endometriosis on preterm birth (PB) risk.MethodsSearches were conducted in PubMed-MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and SciELO for studies published in all languages from inception through April 2017. We included cohort studies evaluating pregnant women with and without endometriosis and conception either by spontaneous conception (SC) or with assisted reproductive technology (ART). Primary outcome was PB (<37 weeks), and secondary outcomes were intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), low birthweight, small for gestational age (SGA), and birthweight. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated as effects, and random-effects models were used for meta-analyses. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and heterogeneity of effects among studies was described with the I2 statistic.ResultsWe identified 9 cohort studies including a total of 1 496 715 pregnancies (13 798 with endometriosis diagnosis). In women with endometriosis, the PB risk was significantly increased in both SC (OR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.32-1.90) and ART (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.14-1.79). The SGA risk was increased in women with endometriosis (OR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.05-1.28), while the IUGR and low birthweight risks and birthweight were not affected by endometriosis.ConclusionEndometriosis is associated with increased PB risk in both SC and women who obtained pregnancy using ART. Prospective studies evaluating relevant outcomes are needed to confirm these results.
Full text 11,135 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Objective To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the effect of endometriosis on preterm birth (PB) risk.

Methods

Searches were conducted in PubMed-MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and SciELO for studies published in all languages from inception through April 2017. We included cohort studies evaluating pregnant women with and without endometriosis and conception either by spontaneous conception (SC) or with assisted reproductive technology (ART). Primary outcome was PB (<37 weeks), and secondary outcomes were intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), low birthweight, small for gestational age (SGA), and birthweight. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated as effects, and random-effects models were used for meta-analyses. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and heterogeneity of effects among studies was described with the I2 statistic.

Results

We identified 9 cohort studies including a total of 1 496 715 pregnancies (13 798 with endometriosis diagnosis). In women with endometriosis, the PB risk was significantly increased in both SC (OR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.32-1.90) and ART (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.14-1.79). The SGA risk was increased in women with endometriosis (OR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.05-1.28), while the IUGR and low birthweight risks and birthweight were not affected by endometriosis.

Conclusion

Endometriosis is associated with increased PB risk in both SC and women who obtained pregnancy using ART. Prospective studies evaluating relevant outcomes are needed to confirm these results. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Petraglia F, Arcuri F, de Ziegler D, Chapron C. Inflammation: a link between endometriosis and preterm birth. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(1):36–40. Brosens I, Pijnenborg R, Benagiano G. Defective myometrial spiral artery remodelling as a cause of major obstetrical syndromes in endometriosis and adenomyosis. Placenta. 2013;34(2):100–105. Tu FF, Du H, Goldstein GP, Beaumont JL, Zhou Y, Brown WJ. The influence of prior oral contraceptive use on risk of endome-triosis is conditional on parity. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(6):1697–1704. Ahn SH, Khalaj K, Young SL, Lessey BA, Koti M, Tayade C. Immune-inflammation gene signatures in endometriosis patients. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(6):1420–1431.e7. Barbara G, Facchin F, Buggio L, et al. What is known and unknown about the association between endometriosis and sexual functioning: a systematic review of the literature. Reprod Sci. 2017;24(12):1566–1576. Mishra VV, Bandwal P, Agarwal R, Aggarwal R. Prevalence, clinical and laparoscopic features of endometriosis among infertile women. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2017;67(3):208–212. Guler I, Erdem A, Oguz Y, et al. The impact of laparoscopic surgery of peritoneal endometriosis and endometrioma on the outcome of ICSI cycles. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2017;63(5):324–330. Vercellini P, Parazzini F, Pietropaolo G, Cipriani S, Frattaruolo MP, Fedele L. Pregnancy outcome in women with peritoneal, ovarian and rectovaginal endometriosis: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG. 2012;119(12):1538–1543. Exacoustos C, Lauriola I, Lazzeri L, De Felice G, Zupi E. Complications during pregnancy and delivery in women with untreated rectovaginal deep infiltrating endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(5):1129–1135.e1. Jacques M, Freour T, Barriere P, Ploteau S. Adverse pregnancy and neo-natal outcomes after assisted reproductive treatment in patients with pelvic endometriosis: a case-control study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016;32(6):626–634. Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Ferrero S, Mangili G, et al. A systematic review on endometriosis during pregnancy: diagnosis, misdiagnosis, complications and outcomes. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22(1):70–103. Macer ML, Taylor HS. Endometriosis and infertility: a review of the pathogenesis and treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2012;39(4):535–549. Palomba S, Homburg R, Santagni S, La Sala GB, Orvieto R. Risk of adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes after high technology in fertility treatment: a comprehensive systematic review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2016;14(1):76. Hayashi M, Nakai A, Satoh S, Matsuda Y. Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies may be related to maternal factors associated with infertility rather than the type of assisted reproductive technology procedure used. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(4):922–928. Hamdan M, Omar SZ, Dunselman G, Cheong Y. Influence of endometriosis on assisted reproductive technology outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(1):79–88. Qin J, Liu X, Sheng X, Wang H, Gao S. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(1):73–85.e1-6. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336–341. Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of non-randomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa, Canada: Ottawa Health Research Institute; 2011. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/ oxford.htm. Accessed 18 August 2017 DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177–188. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions; 2011. http://training.cochrane.org/hand book. Accessed 18 August 2017 Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629–634. Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan), Version 5. 2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre; 2011. Carassou-Maillan A, Pouly JL, Mulliez A, et al. Adverse pregnancy outcomes after Assisted Reproduction Technology in women with endometriosis [in French]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2014;42(4):210–215. Fernando S, Breheny S, Jaques AM, Halliday JL, Baker G, Healy D. Preterm birth, ovarian endometriomata, and assisted reproduction technologies. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(2):325–330. Fujii T, Wada-Hiraike O, Nagamatsu T, et al. Assisted reproductive technology pregnancy complications are significantly associated with endometriosis severity before conception: a retrospective cohort study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2016;14(1):73. Glavind MT, Forman A, Arendt LH, Nielsen K, Henriksen TB. Endometriosis and pregnancy complications: a Danish cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(1):160–166. Kuivasaari-Pirinen P, Raatikainen K, Hippeläinen M, Heinonen S. Adverse outcomes of IVF/ICSI pregnancies vary depending on aetiology of infertility. ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2012;2012:451915. Mannini L, Sorbi F, Noci I, et al. New adverse obstetrics outcomes associated with endometriosis: a retrospective cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295(1):141–151. Mekaru K, Masamoto H, Sugiyama H, et al. Endometriosis and pregnancy outcome: are pregnancies complicated by endometrio-sis a high-risk group? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;172:36–39. Stephansson O, Kieler H, Granath F, Falconer H. Endometriosis, assisted reproduction technology, and risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(9):2341–2347. Stern JE, Luke B, Tobias M, Gopal D, Hornstein MD, Diop H. Adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes associated with underlying diagnosis with and without assisted reproductive technology treatment. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(6):1438–1445. Maignien C, Santulli P, Gayet V, et al. Prognostic factors for assisted reproductive technology in women with endometriosis-related infertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(3):280.e1–280.e9. Park JS, Park CW, Lockwood CJ, Norwitz ER. Role of cytokines in preterm labor and birth. Minerva Ginecol. 2005;57(4):349–366. Romero R, Dey SK, Fisher SJ. Preterm labor: one syndrome, many causes. Science. 2014;345(6198):760–765. Holzman C, Lin X, Senagore P, Chung H. Histologic chorioam-nionitis and preterm delivery. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166(7):786–794. Munrós J, Martínez-Zamora MA, Tàssies D, et al. Total circulating microparticle levels are increased in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(2):325–331. Sikora J, Smycz-Kubańska M, Mielczarek-Palacz A, Kondera-Anasz Z. Abnormal peritoneal regulation of chemokine activa-tion—the role of IL-8 in pathogenesis of endometriosis. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2017;77(4). doi:10.1111/aji.12622. Vannuccini S, Clifton VL, Fraser IS, et al. Infertility and reproductive disorders: impact of hormonal and inflammatory mechanisms on pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22(1):104–115. Tanaka Y, Mori T, Ito F, et al. Exacerbation of endometriosis due to regulatory T cell dysfunction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(9):3206–3217. Exacoustos C, Luciano D, Corbett B, et al. The uterine junctional zone: a 3-dimensional ultrasound study of patients with endome-triosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(3):248.e1-7. Benagiano G, Brosens I, Habiba M. Structural and molecular features of the endomyometrium in endometriosis and adenomyo-sis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(3):386–402. Roux P, Perrin J, Mancini J, Agostini A, Boubli L, Courbiere B. Factors associated with a poor prognosis for the IVF-ICSI live birth rate in women with rAFS stage III and IV endometriosis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34(7):921–928. Revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis: 1996. Fertil Steril. 1997;67(5):817–821. Matalliotakis IM, Cakmak H, Mahutte N, Fragouli Y, Arici A, Sakkas D. Women with advanced-stage endometriosis and previous surgery respond less well to gonadotropin stimulation, but have similar IVF implantation and delivery rates compared with women with tubal factor infertility. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(6):1568–1572. Marianowski P, Dąbrowski FA, Zygula A, Wielgoś M, Szymusik I. Do we pay enough attention to culture conditions in context of perinatal outcome after in vitro fertilization? Up-to-date literature review. Bio Med Res Int. 2016;2016:3285179. Wennberg AL, Opdahl S, Bergh C, et al. Effect of maternal age on maternal and neonatal outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(5):1142–1149.e14. Pinborg A, Wennerholm UB, Romundstad LB, et al. Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19(2):87–104. Author information Authors and Affiliations Consortia Corresponding author Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Pérez-López, F.R., Villagrasa-Boli, P., Muñoz-Olarte, M. et al. Association Between Endometriosis and Preterm Birth in Women With Spontaneous Conception or Using Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies. Reprod. Sci. 25, 311–319 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719117749760 Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719117749760

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Fetal Growth Retardation Pregnancy Outcome Premature Birth Reproductive Techniques, Assisted Endometriosis Female Fetal Growth Retardation Humans Infant, Newborn Infant, Small for Gestational Age Pregnancy Premature Birth

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (48)

Cited by (29)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-23T09:30:01.253652+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:20:01.354358+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-23T06:29:45.520198+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK