Endometriosis and pregnancy outcome: are pregnancies complicated by endometriosis a high-risk group?

Mekaru K, Keiko Mekaru, Hitoshi Masamoto, Masamoto H, Sugiyama H, Hitoshi Sugiyama, Kozue Asato, Asato K, Heshiki C, Chiaki Heshiki, Kinjyo T, Tadatsugu Kinjyo, Yoichi Aoki, Aoki Y
European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2013 · vol. 172 , pp. 36–39 · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.10.024 · PMID:24268981 · W2064362667
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 53 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09 ⓘ

This paper investigates whether pregnancies complicated by endometriosis constitute a high-risk group by examining pregnancy outcomes.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ObjectivesIncreased incidence of preterm birth, pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) babies have been reported in women with endometriosis, but the study populations included women in whom a definitive diagnosis was not attainable, and women who conceived via in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer (IVF/ET), which, in itself, is a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcome. Thus there is a lack of consensus on the effects of endometriosis on pregnancy outcome. This study compared the pregnancy outcomes of women with or without a definitive diagnosis of endometriosis on laparoscopy.Study designRetrospective comparison of pregnancy outcomes of 108 women who underwent managed delivery of pregnancies established after laparoscopic investigation of infertility. Women with factors known to affect pregnancy outcome, such as age ≥41 years, conception via IVF/ET and multiple births, were excluded. Forty-nine of the study participants had endometriosis (En+ group) and 59 participants did not have endometriosis (En- group).ResultsThere were no significant differences in mean (±standard deviation) age (33±3.8 vs 33.6±4.1 years), history of miscarriage, history of preterm birth and history of PIH between the two groups. Ovulation induction was used for infertility treatment in 26.5% of the En+ group and 30.5% of the En- group, and artificial insemination was used in 30.6% of the En+ group and 32.2% of the En- group. Regarding pregnancy outcomes, no significant differences in miscarriage (18.4% vs 18.6%), subchorionic haematoma (5.0% vs 2.1%), preterm birth (7.5% vs 8.3%), PIH (15.0% vs 12.5%), caesarean section (32.5% vs 22.9%), gestational age at delivery (38.9±1.5 vs 38.8±1.7 weeks), birth weight (3013.3±480 vs 2934.5±639.5g) and SGA babies (2.5% vs 2.1%) were found between the En+ and En- groups. Placental abruption did not occur in either group. One neonate had trisomy 21 in the En+ group, and one woman had gestational diabetes in the En- group.ConclusionEndometriosis may not affect pregnancy outcome, but there is a need for a large prospective study.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Abortion, Spontaneous Cesarean Section Endometriosis Hematoma Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced Pregnancy Complications Premature Birth Abortion, Spontaneous Adult Apgar Score Birth Weight Case-Control Studies Cesarean Section Chorion Chorion Cohort Studies Endometriosis Female Gestational Age Hematoma

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (29)

Cited by (50)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-04T06:16:37.499272+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:18:47.062786+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK