Expert consensus on the obstetric management of pregnant patients with endometriosis: A modified Delphi study

review OA: hybrid CC0
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08

Expert obstetricians reached consensus that pregnant patients with endometriosis generally require standard antenatal care without routine intensification, except for risk-adapted thromboprophylaxis and postpartum contraception.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis affects approximately 10% of reproductive-age women and has been associated with adverse obstetric outcomes. However, evidence guiding antenatal management remains limited and inconsistent. OBJECTIVE: To develop evidence-based, consensus-driven recommendations for the management of spontaneous pregnancies in women with endometriosis. METHODS: A modified Delphi process was conducted in France, involving two rounds of structured surveys and a final consensus meeting with expert obstetrician-gynecologists. A systematic literature review informed the development of clinical statements. Experts rated recommendations using a 9-point Likert scale. Consensus-defined recommendations were synthesized and graded using a GRADE-informed approach. RESULTS: Twenty-three experts from 21 French centers participated. Across clinical domains, including hypertensive disorders, fetal growth, preterm birth, miscarriage, placenta praevia, venous thromboembolism, gestational diabetes, postpartum hemorrhage, and contraception, experts consistently supported standard antenatal care without systematic intensification. No evidence supported routine additional surveillance or preventive interventions specific to endometriosis. Risk-adapted thromboprophylaxis, active management of the third stage of labor, and early postpartum hormonal contraception were recommended. CONCLUSIONS: In women with endometriosis, routine antenatal care remains appropriate in the absence of additional risk factors. Despite reported associations with adverse outcomes, there is no evidence supporting systematic modification of standard management. A conservative, individualized approach is recommended, highlighting the need for high-quality prospective studies to refine care strategies.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (29)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-23T09:30:01.253652+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-08-18T06:03:38.117434+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-08-23T06:10:31.581523+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK