Selective inhibition of prostaglandin E2 receptors EP2 and EP4 modulates DNA methylation and histone modification machinery proteins in human endometriotic cells

article OA: green CC0 ⤵ 36 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-11

Selective inhibition of prostaglandin E2 receptors EP2 and EP4 modulates DNA methylation and histone modification machinery proteins in human endometriotic cells.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-11 · read from full text

The study investigated whether selective inhibition of prostaglandin E2 receptors EP2 and EP4 alters epigenetic “machinery” proteins and histone/DNA methylation-related marks in human endometriotic epithelial cells (12Z) and stromal cells (22B), using EP2 (AH6809) and EP4 (AH23848) antagonists for 24 hours. Western blot analyses found that EP2/EP4 inhibition decreased DNMT3a protein in both cell types, reduced DNMT3b protein in 12Z but not in 22B, and did not change DNMT1 expression, indicating receptor-specific and epithelial–stromal–specific regulation. The authors also assessed H3K4, H3K9, and H3K27 methylation/acetylation states and reported EP2/EP4-dependent increases in H3K4 methylation in 22B (not 12Z) alongside decreases in H3K9 and H3K27 methylation with concurrent changes in histone acetylation. The paper’s main limitation is that these findings are derived from immortalized in vitro endometriotic cell lines rather than primary lesion tissue or in vivo epigenetic readouts, so cell-line–specific effects and incomplete mechanistic causal links cannot be excluded. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it tests how blocking EP2/EP4 signaling modulates DNA methylation and histone modification machinery in human endometriotic epithelial and stromal cells.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Endometriosis is an inflammatory gynecological disease of reproductive-age women. The prevalence of endometriosis is 5-10% in reproductive-age women. Modern medical treatments are directed to inhibit the action of estrogen in endometriotic cells. However, hormonal therapies targeting estrogen can be prescribed only for a short time because of their undesirable side effects. Recent studies from our laboratory, using human endometriotic epithelial cell line 12Z and stromal cell line 22B derived from red lesion, discovered that selective inhibition of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) receptors EP2 and EP4 inhibits adhesion, invasion, growth, and survival of 12Z and 22B cells by modulating integrins, MMPs and TIMPs, cell cycle, survival, and intrinsic apoptotic pathways, suggesting multiple epigenetic mechanisms. The novel findings of the present study indicate that selective pharmacological inhibition of EP2 and EP4: (i) decreases expression of DNMT3a, DNMT3b, H3K9me3, H3K27me3, SUV39H1, HP1a, H3K27, EZH2, JMJD2a, HDAC1, HDAC3, MeCP2, CoREST and Sin3A; (ii) increases expression of H3K4me3, H3H9ac, H3K27ac; and (iii) does not modulate the expression of DNMT1, hSET1, LSD1, MBD1, p300, HDAC2, and JMJD3 epigenetic machinery proteins in an epithelial and stromal cell specific manner. In this study, we report for the first time that inhibition of PGE2-EP2/EP4 signaling modulates DNA methylation, H3 histone methylation and acetylation, and epigenetic memory machinery proteins in human endometriotic epithelial cells and stromal cells. Thus, targeting EP2 and EP4 receptors may emerge as long-term nonsteroidal therapy for treatment of active endometriotic lesions in women.
Full text 23,300 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 4 sections · click to expand

Results

First, we investigated the effects of selective inhibition of EP2/EP4 signaling on DNA methylation machinery proteins in endometriotic epithelial cells 12Z and stromal cells 22B. Results ( Fig-1 ) indicated that inhibition of EP2/EP4 decreased (p<0.05) expression of DNMT3a protein in 12Z and 22B cells, decreased (p<0.05) DNMT3b protein in 12Z cells but not in 22B cells, and did not modulate the expression of DNMT1 in both 12Z and 22B cells. These results indicate that inhibition of EP2/EP4 selectively regulates the DNMT3a and DNMT3b proteins in an epithelial-stromal cell specific manner in endometriosis. Next, we investigated the effects of selective inhibition of EP2/EP4 signaling on acetylation and methylation of H3 histone at K4, K9 and K27 in endometriotic epithelial cells 12Z and stromal cells 22B. Results ( Fig-2 ) indicated that inhibition of EP2/EP4 increased (p<0.05) methylation of H3K4 protein in 22B cells but not in 12Z cells. Inhibition of EP2 and EP4 decreased (p<0.05) methylation of H3K9 and H3K27 and concomitantly increased (p<0.05) acetylation of H3K9 and H3K27 in both 12Z and 22B cells. These results together indicate that inhibition of EP2 and EP4 selectively regulates acetylation and methylation of H3K9 and H3K27 proteins and sustains methylation H3K4 in an epithelial-stromal cell specific manner in endometriosis. Modulation in methylation status of H3K4, H3K9 and H3K27 in 12Z and 22B cells lead us to investigate the effects of selective inhibition of EP2/EP4 signaling on H3 histone methylation and demethylation machinery proteins. Results ( Fig-3 ) indicated that inhibition of EP2/EP4 did not modulate expression of H3K4 methyltransferase hSET1 and demethylase LSD1 proteins in 12Z and 22B cells. Inhibition of EP2/EP4 decreased (p<0.05) H3K9 methyltransferase SUV39H1 protein and its adapter protein heterochromatin protein 1a (HP1a) and demethylase JMJD2A in 12Z and 22B cells. Inhibition of EP2/EP4 decreased (p<0.05) H3K27 methyltransferase EZH2 protein but not demethylase JMJD3 protein in 12Z and 22B cells. These results together indicate that inhibition of EP2/EP4 does not modulate methylation of H3K4 but regulates methylation of H3K9 and H3K27 through key important machinery proteins in an epithelial-stromal cell specific manner in endometriosis. Modulation in acetylation status of H3K9 and H3K27 in 12Z and 22B cells lead us to investigate effects of selective inhibition of EP2/EP4 signaling on H3 histone acetylation and deacetylation machinery proteins. Results ( Fig-4 ) indicated that inhibition of EP2/EP4 decreased (p<0.05) expression of HDAC1 protein in both 12Z and 22B cells, decreased (p<0.05) expression of HDAC3 only in 12Z cells, and did not modulate expression of HDAC2 in both 12Z and 22B cells. Importantly, inhibition of EP2/EP4 did not decrease expression of acetyltransferase p300 in 12Z and 22B cells. These results together indicate that inhibition of EP2/EP4 sustains acetylation whereas selectively suppresses deacetylation machinery proteins in an epithelial-stromal cell specific manner in endometriosis. Finally, we investigated effects of selective inhibition of EP2/EP4 signaling on transcriptional activation and suppression machinery proteins in 12Z and 22B cells. Results ( Fig-5 ) indicated that inhibition of EP2/EP4 decreased (p<0.05) expression of transcriptional repression machinery proteins MeCP2, MBD1, CoREST and Sin3A in both 12Z and 22B cells. Importantly in contrast, inhibition of EP2/EP4 did not decrease expression of transcription activation machinery protein Pol II in both 12Z and 22B cells. These results together indicate that inhibition of EP2/EP4 sustains transcriptional activation whereas selectively decreases transcriptional suppression machinery proteins in an epithelial-stromal cell specific manner in endometriosis.

Materials

The reagents used in this study were purchased from the following suppliers: Prestained protein markers and Bio-Rad assay reagents and standards (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA); Protran BA83 Nitrocellulose membrane (Whatman Inc, Sanford, ME); Pierce ECL (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL); protease inhibitor cocktail tablets complete EDTA-free and PhosStop (Roche Applied Biosciences, Indianapolis, IN); antibiotic-antimycotic, and trypsin–EDTA (Invitrogen Life Technologies Inc, Carlsbad, CA); Blue X-Ray film (Phenix Research Products, Hayward, CA); fetal bovine serum (HyClone, Logan, UT); and tissue culture dishes and plates (Corning Inc, Corning, NY). Antagonists/inhibitors for EP2 (AH6809), EP4 (AH23848) were purchased from Sigma (Sigma-Aldrich, St-Louis, MO). All other antibodies used in this study were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA), Chemicon International (Billerica, MA), or Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA) except β-actin monoclonal antibody (Sigma-Aldrich), goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MA). The chemicals used were molecular biological grade from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA) or Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Immortalized endometriotic epithelial cell line 12Z and stromal cell line 22B used in this study were derived from active red peritoneal endometriosis lesions during the proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle from women [ 30 ]. These 12Z and 22B cells share several phenotypic and molecular characteristics of primary cultured endometriotic cells [ 30 ]. Accumulating information from our and other laboratories indicates that 12Z and 22B cells mimic the active/progressive phase of endometriosis. [ 30 , 31 , 36 , 37 , 67 ]. Importantly, xenograft of a mixed population of these 12Z and 22B cells into the peritoneal cavity of nude mice is able to proliferate, attach, invade, reorganize and establish peritoneal endometriosis-like lesions and that histomorphology are similar to that of spontaneous peritoneal endometriosis in women [ 34 ]. We have shown that 12Z and 22B cells produce large amounts of PGE 2 at basal conditions, and therefore, inhibition of EP2 and EP4 is the best approach rather than treating the cells with PGE 2 to investigate PGE2-EP2/EP4 signaling [ 31 , 35 – 37 ]. These well-characterized 12Z and 22B cells were cultured in DMEM/F12 without special steroid treatment containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and penicillin (100 U/ml), streptomycin (100 μg/ml) and amphotericin-B 2.5 μg/ml in a humidified 5% CO 2 and 95% air at 37°C as we described previously [ 31 , 35 – 37 ]. At 70–80% confluency the cells were cultured in DMEM/F12 with 2% dextran-charcoal-treated fetal bovine serum (DC-FBS) and treated with EP2 and EP4 inhibitors (EP-I) for EP2 (AH6809–75 μM) and EP4 (AH23848–50 μM) for 24h. These inhibitors competitively bind with the respective EP2 or EP4 receptors and inhibit their activations [ 71 – 73 ] but not their expressions [ 31 ]. The doses for these inhibitors were selected based on the dose response experiments as we published previously [ 34 , 36 , 37 ]. Total protein was isolated from endometriotic cells and immunoblotting/western blotting was performed as we described previously [ 31 , 32 ]. Briefly, the cells were harvested using 1% Trypsin-EDTA and pelleted. The cell lysates were sonicated in sonication buffer consisting of 20mM Tris-Hcl, 0.5mM EDTA, 100 μM DEDTC, 1% Tween, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and protease inhibitor cocktail tablets: complete EDTA-free (1 tablet/50 ml) and PhosStop (1 tablet/10 ml). Sonication was performed using a Microson ultrasonic cell disruptor (Microsonix Incorporated, Farmingdale, NY). Protein concentration was determined using the Bradford method [ 74 ] and a Bio-Rad Protein Assay kit. Protein samples (75 μg) were resolved using 7.5%, 10% or 12.5% SDS-PAGE, as we described previously [ 31 , 32 ]. A total of 24 epigenetics modifier proteins were measured. The primary and secondary antibodies used and concentrations are given in Table-1 . Briefly, the western blots were incubated with primary antibody overnight at 4°C and with the secondary antibody for 1h at room temperature. Chemiluminescent substrate was applied according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Pierce Biotechnology). The blots were exposed to Blue X-Ray film and densitometry of autoradiograms was performed using an Alpha Imager (Alpha Innotech Corporation, San Leandro, CA). Statistical analyses were performed using general linear models of Statistical Analysis System (SAS, Cary, NC). Effects of inhibition of EP2 and EP4 on expression levels of different proteins in 12Z and 22B cells were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey-Kramer HSD test. The numerical data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was considered at P<0.05.

Discussion

Although PGE 2 plays important roles in the pathogenesis of endometriosis [ 5 – 11 ], its epigenetic actions in endometriosis is not known. In this study, we report for the first time that inhibition of PGE 2 -EP2/EP4 signaling regulates several epigenetics machinery proteins associated with DNA methylation and histone modification in human endometriotic epithelial cells 12Z and stromal cells 22B. DNA methylation is a covalent chemical modification of DNA resulting in addition of a methyl group at the carbon 5-position of the cytosine within CpG [ 38 ]. DNA methylation is established and maintained by three active DNA methyltransferases, DNMT3a, DNMT3b and DNMT1. DNMT3a and DNMT3b are involved in de novo DNA methylation and DNMT1 is primarily involved in propagating heritable DNA methylation patterns [ 38 ]. Results of the present study indicate that inhibition of EP2/EP4 decreases expression de novo DNMAT3a and DNMT3c in an epithelial and stromal cell specific manner in endometriosis. These results suggest that inhibition PGE 2 -EP2/EP4 signaling may alter DNA methylation state of epigenetically silenced gens in endometriosis through suppression of DNMT3a and DNMT3b. Recent studies indicate that histone methylation is a prerequisite for DNA methylation [ 43 – 47 ]. The core histone octomer comprises histone proteins H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 [ 43 – 47 ]. Among the histone modifications implicated in gene activation and silencing, the best characterized to date are acetylation or methylation of lysine (K) at Histone 3 such as H3K9, H3K27 and H3K4 [ 43 – 47 ]. Acetylation of H3K9 and H3K27 and tri-methylation of H3K4 leads to the formation of an open chromatin structure (euchromatin) and thus transcriptional activation [ 43 – 45 ]. By contrast, tri-methylation of H3K9 and H3K27 leads to the formation of closed chromatin structure (heterochromatin) and thus marks transcriptional repression [ 43 – 45 ]. Results of the present study indicate that Inhibition of EP2/EP4 decreases methylation of H3K9 and H3K27 and concomitantly increases acetylation of H3K9 and H3K27 in epithelial and stromal cell specific manner in endometriosis. These results suggest that inhibition of PGE 2 -EP2/EP4 signaling selectively suppresses methylation of H3K9 and H3K27 and thereby inhibits heterochromatin and establishes euchromatin states in endometriosis. Addition or removal of a tri-methyl group (CH3) into Lysine (K) at H3 histone is catalyzed by histone methyltransferases [ 52 , 53 ] and histone/lysine demethylases [ 54 – 57 ]. Addition or removal of an acetyl group (COCH3) into Lysine (K) at H3 histone is catalyzed by histone acetyltransferases [ 48 , 49 ] and histone deacetylases (HDACs) [ 50 , 51 ], respectively. Multiple enzymes are discovered until today and we have examined some of the important and well characterized enzymes in the preset study. Addition of CH3 into H3K9 is catalyzed by histone methyltransferase SUV39H1 protein through its adapter protein HP1a and removal of CH3 from H3K9 is catalyzed by histone demethylase JMJD2A. Addition of CH3 into H3K27 is catalyzed by histone methyltransferase EZH2 and removal of CH3 from H3K27 is catalyzed by histone demethylase JMJD3 [ 43 – 47 ]. Results of the present study indicate that inhibition of EP2/EP4 decreases H3K9 methylation machinery proteins SUV39H1 and HP1a and JMJD2A, and decreases H3K27 methylation machinery proteins EZH2 but not JMJD3 in an epithelial and stromal cell specific manner in endometriosis. In addition, our results indicate that inhibition of EP2/EP4 decreases expression of HDAC1, HDAC3 but not HDAC2 and acetyltransferase p300 in an epithelial and stromal cell specific manner in endometriosis. These results suggest that inhibition of PGE 2 -EP2/EP4 decreases methylation of H3K9 and H3K27 primarily through down-regulation of methyltransferases SUV39H1 and EZH2, respectively, and concomitantly increases acetylation of H3K9 and H3K27 through down-regulation of HDAC1 and HDAC3 in endometriosis. Methylation of H3K4 is a classical transcription activation mark. Addition of CH3 group into H3K4 is catalyzed by hSET1 protein and removal of CH3 group from H3K4 is catalyzed by LSD1 protein [ 52 , 53 ]. Results of the present study indicate that inhibition of EP2/EP4 did not modulate methylation of H3K4 and expression of hSET1 and LSD1 proteins in endometriotic epithelial and stromal cells. These results suggest that inhibition of PGE2-EP2/EP4 sustains methylation of H3K4 and thus maintains H3K4me3-mediated transcriptional activation memory in endometriosis. It is well known that hypermethylated CpG recruit methyl CpG binding domain proteins (MBDs) such as MeCp2 and MBD1–4 and these MBD proteins in turn recruit a variety of protein complexes that contain HDACs and co-repressors sin3A and Co-REST and thus establish silenced heterochromatin and transcriptional repression of genes [ 38 – 42 ]. In contrast, open euchromatin allows Poll II and other transcriptional activation factors to promote transcriptional activation [ 75 , 76 ]. Results of the present study indicate that inhibition of EP2/EP4 decreases expression of transcriptional repression machinery proteins MeCP2, MBD1, CoREST and Sin3A but do not modulate the expression of the important transcriptional activation machinery protein Pol II in endometriotic epithelial and stromal cells. These results together indicate that inhibition of PGE 2 -EP2/EP4 sustains transcriptional activation whereas selectively decreases transcriptional suppression machinery proteins in an epithelial-stromal cell specific manner in endometriosis. Many recent findings highlight the intimate link between DNA methylation and histone modifications [ 43 – 47 ]. DNMT interacts with H3K9 through SUV39h1 and HP1a. Loss of function of SUV39h1 and loss of methylation of H3K9 decreases DNMT3b-dependent CpG methylation at major pericentric satellites [ 43 , 46 , 47 ]. Poly-comb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) is composed of EZH2, EED, and SUZ12 [ 44 , 45 ]. The set domain EZH2 directly catalyzes methylation of H3K27, and its indirect interaction with DNMTs may result in DNA methylation [ 43 – 45 ]. These land-mark studies together indicate that epigenetic information can flow from histones to DNA through and results in subsequent DNA methylation; concomitantly the DNA methylation can exert a positive feedback on histone acetylation and/or methylation. Interaction between these two distinct epigenetic pathways results in a self-propagating cycle that promotes long-term epigenetic marks. Results of the present study and along with these previous studies suggest that PGE2-EP2/EP4 signaling may regulate these two epigenetic pathways in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Using endometriotic epithelial cells 12Z and stromal cells 22B model system, we have shown that selective inhibition of EP2/EP4 inhibits adhesions, migration, invasion, growth and survival of endometriotic epithelial and stromal cells by modulating up to 75 proteins associated with these pathways. In this study, we have shown that inhibition of EP2 and EP4 modulates up to 24 proteins involved in DNA methylation, H3K4, H3K9 and H3K9 methylation and acetylation, transcriptional activation and suppression in endometriotic cells. Our unpublished data indicate that inhibition of EP2/EP4 signaling upregulates epigenetically silenced proapoptotic miRNAs in 12Z and 22B cells. Ongoing studies in our laboratory will identify the interaction among PGE 2 -EP2/EP4 signaling and restoration of epigenetically silenced proapoptotic miRNAs in endometriosis using in vitro and in vivo model systems. In addition, our future studies will be directed to dissect interaction between EP2/EP4 signaling and loss of PR-B (progesterone resistance) in the endometriosis. In conclusion, results of the present study indicate that EP2/EP4-mediated PGE 2 signaling regulates epigenetics of endometriosis. The novel findings are that selective inhibition of EP2/EP4: (i) inhibits DNMT3a and DNMT3b; (ii) decrease methylations and increase acetylation of H3K9 and H3K27 by modulating the epigenetic modifier/memory proteins; (iii) sustains methylation of H3K4 and its methylation machinery proteins; and (iv) inhibits transcriptional suppression machinery proteins without modulating transcriptional activation machinery proteins in endometriotic epithelial and stromal cells. Targeting EP2 and EP4 receptors may emerge as long-term nonsteroidal therapy for treatment of active red endometriotic lesions in women.

Introduction

Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent and progesterone-resistant inflammatory gynecological disease of reproductive-age women. It is characterized by the presence of functional endometrium outside the uterine cavity. The prevalence of endometriosis is 5~10% in reproductive-age women, increases to 20–30% in women with subfertility, and to 40–60% in women with pain and infertility [ 1 , 2 ]. Modern medical treatments are directed to inhibit the action of estrogen in endometriotic cells through suppression of ovarian estrogen production via oral contraceptives, aromatase inhibitors, androgenic agents, and GnRH analogues [ 1 – 4 ]. However, these hormonal therapies can be prescribed only for a short time (~6–9 months) because of their undesirable side effects [ 1 – 4 ]. In addition, endometriosis reestablishes (~50–60%) within a year after cessation of anti-estrogen hormonal therapies [ 3 , 4 ]. Concentrations of PGE 2 in the peritoneal fluid are higher in women with endometriosis compared to that of endometriosis-free women, and this increased PGE 2 plays important role in survival and growth of endometriotic lesions [ 5 – 11 ]. Inhibition of PGE 2 biosynthesis impedes growth of endometriosis [ 11 ] and endometriosis-associated pelvic pain in women [ 8 ], and decreases growth and survival of experimental endometriosis in animal models [ 7 , 9 , 10 ]. Cytosolic phospholipase A2 liberates arachidonic acid (AA) from phospholipids. Cyclooxygenases COX-1 and COX-2 convert AA into PGH 2 [ 12 ]. Prostaglandin E synthases covert PGH 2 into PGE 2 . PGE 2 exerts its biological effects via seven-transmembrane G-protein coupled receptors EP1, EP2, EP3, and EP4 by integrating multiple cell signaling pathways [ 13 – 17 ]. EP1 activates PKC and Ca2 + pathways. EP2 and EP4 activate PKA pathway. Activation of EP3A-D produces a wide range of complex and opposite actions [ 18 ]. Recent studies indicate that PGE 2 transactivates ERK1/2, AKT, NFκB, and β-catenin pathways through EP2 and EP4 in cancer cells [ 13 – 17 ]. PGE2 has been shown to increase the survival of normal lung fibroblast and colon cancer cells through DNA methylation and histone modifications [ 19 , 20 ]. Clinical, cellular, and molecular evidence support a stagewise phenotypic progression of peritoneal endometriotic lesions which include red vesicular, black powder-burn, and fibrotic phenotypes [ 21 – 29 ]. The red lesions are the earliest and most biochemically active phenotype of endometriosis. Importantly, the glandular epithelial and stromal cells of these red lesions secrete large amounts of estradiol, PGE 2 , cytokines, growth factors, and bleed in response to menstrual hormones [ 21 – 29 ] and thus possess greater adhesion, invasion, proliferation, and survival potential compared to other lesion phenotypes [ 21 – 23 , 26 – 28 , 30 ]. Recent studies from our laboratory, using endometriotic epithelial cell line 12Z and stromal cell line 22B derived from a red lesion, discovered that selective inhibition of EP2 and EP4 receptors: (i) inhibits adhesion, invasion, growth, and survival of endometriotic epithelial cells 12Z and stromal cells 22B by modulating integrins, MMPs and TIMPs, cell cycle, survival, and intrinsic apoptotic pathways [ 31 – 37 ]. These results indicate that multifactorial effects of selective inhibition of EP2 and EP4 may be due to epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation and histone modifications. DNA methylation is established and maintained by three active DNA methyltransferases, DNMT3a, DNMT3b and DNMT1 [ 38 ]. DNMT3a and DNMT3b are involved in de novo DNA methylation [ 38 ]. DNA methylation recruits methyl CpG binding domain proteins, HDACs, and co-repressors and thus establishes silenced heterochromatin and transcriptional repression of genes through histone modifications [ 38 – 42 ]. On the other hand, histone methylation is a prerequisite for DNA methylation [ 43 – 47 ]. Multiple histone acetyltransferases [ 48 , 49 ], deacetylases [ 50 , 51 ], methyltransferases [ 52 , 53 ], and demethylases [ 54 – 57 ] have been discovered. Methylation of H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 leads to the formation of closed chromatin structure (heterochromatin) and thus marks transcriptional repression [ 43 – 45 ]. DNMT interacts with H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 through multiple mechanisms and results in DNA methylation [ 43 – 45 ]. In contrast, acetylation of H3K9ac and H3K27ac and methylation of H3K4me3 leads to the formation of an open chromatin structure (euchromatin) and thus marks transcriptional activation [ 43 – 45 ]. Together, cross-talk between these two epigenetic pathways reinforces long-term transcriptional repression or activation [ 43 – 45 ]. While this epigenetic cross-talk pathway has been well studied in embryogenesis and tumorigenesis in the last decade, these processes are largely unknown in endometriosis. Emerging evidence suggests that epigenetics plays a definite role in the pathogenesis of endometriosis [ 58 , 59 ]. DNMT1, DNMT3a and DNMT3b mRNAs are overexpressed in endometriosis [ 60 ]. HOXA10 and PR-B genes are hypermethylated in endometriosis [ 61 – 64 ]. Trichostatin A (HDAC pan inhibitor) inhibits NFκB signaling, COX-2 expression, and cell proliferation; by contrast, increases expression of PR-B and E-cadherin in endometriotic cells in vitro [ 64 – 67 ]. The DNA methylation inhibitor 5-Aza differentially regulates expression of ERβ and SF-1 in endometrial and endometriotic cells [ 68 – 70 ]. Although PGE 2 plays an important role in the pathogenesis of endometriosis [ 5 – 11 , 32 ], the underlying epigenetic mechanisms of PGE 2 action are largely unknown. The objective of the present study was to identify the effects of selective inhibition of EP2 and EP4 on regulation of DNA methylation, H3K4, H3K9, and H3K29 Histone modifications (methylation and acetylation), and transcriptional activation or suppression machinery proteins in human endometriotic epithelial and stromal cells.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Biphenyl Compounds DNA Methylation Endometriosis Histones Prostaglandin Antagonists Xanthones Acetylation Acetylation Biphenyl Compounds Cell Line DNA Methylation Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Epigenesis, Genetic Epigenesis, Genetic Female Gene Expression Regulation Gene Expression Regulation Histones

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (79)

Cited by (36)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-11T06:11:44.160905+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:17:58.238279+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK