Preoperative work-up for patients with deeply infiltrating endometriosis: transvaginal ultrasonography must definitely be the first-line imaging examination

Piketty M, M. Piketty, Mathilde Piketty, Nicolás Chopin, Nicolas Chopin, Chopin N, ChopinNicolas, B. Dousset, Bertrand Dousset, Anne-Elodie Millischer-Bellaische, A.-E. Millischer-Bellaische, Millischer-Bellaische AE, Roseau G, Gilles Roseau, G Roseau, Mahaut Leconte, Leconte M, Bruno Borghese, Borghese B, Charles Chapron, Chapron C
Human Reproduction · 2008 · vol. 24(3) , pp. 602–607 · doi:10.1093/humrep/den405 · PMID:19095669 · W2123731923
Diagnostic accuracy OA: bronze CC0 ⤵ 242 in-corpus citations
📄 Open PDF View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

Transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) demonstrated similar accuracy in diagnosing rectal wall involvement in deeply infiltrating endometriosis, but TVUS should be the first-line imaging examination due to its advantages.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) has important advantages compared with transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS): it is less invasive, is cost-effective, is a familiar and well-accepted approach, and anesthesia is not required. We compared the accuracy of TVUS and TRUS for diagnosing rectal wall involvement in patients presenting with histologically proved deeply infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). METHODS: Prospective study of 134 patients with histologically proved DIE underwent preoperative investigations using both TVUS and TRUS. The radiologist (TVUS) and sonographer (TRUS) were unaware of the clinical findings but knew that DIE was suspected. RESULTS: DIE was confirmed histologically for all the patients. A rectal wall involvement was histologically proved for 75 patients (56%). For the diagnosis of infiltration of the intestinal wall, TVUS and TRUS, respectively, had a sensitivity of 90.7% and 96.0%, a specificity of 96.5% and 100.0%, a positive predictive value of 97.1% and 100.0% and a negative predictive value of 88.9% and 95.2%. CONCLUSIONS: TVUS and TRUS have similar degrees of accuracy for predicting intestinal involvement. TVUS must be the first-line imaging process to perform for patients presenting with clinically suspected DIE. The question for the coming years is to define if it is necessary for TRUS to be carried out systematically in cases of clinically suspected DIE.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisdie_deep_infiltrating

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometriosis Endosonography Rectum Ultrasonography Vagina Adult Adult Cost-Benefit Analysis Cost-Benefit Analysis Diagnostic Imaging Diagnostic Imaging Diagnostic Imaging Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endosonography Endosonography Female Female

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (53)

Cited by (50)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-16T06:09:50.462052+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:05:57.285809+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK