Value of Endorectal Ultrasonography for Diagnosing Rectovaginal Septal Endometriosis Infiltrating the Rectum

Delpy R, R Delpy, Marc Barthet, Barthet M, M Barthet, Mohamed Gasmi, M Gasmi, Gasmi M, Stéphane Berdah, S Berdah, Berdah S, Shojai R, R Shojai, A Desjeux, Ariadne Desjeux, Desjeux A, L Boubli, Boubli L, J-C Grimaud, J.-C. Grimaud, Grimaud JC
Endoscopy · 2005 · vol. 37(4) , pp. 357–361 · doi:10.1055/s-2005-861115 · PMID:15824947 · W1988860362
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 54 in-corpus citations
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-10 ⓘ

Endoscopic ultrasonography effectively diagnosed rectovaginal septal endometriosis and rectal wall infiltration, showing high sensitivity and negative predictive value for these conditions.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-10 · read from full text ⓘ

This prospective single-center study (May 1998–March 2003) evaluated whether anorectal endoscopic ultrasonography using a 7.5-MHz miniprobe with a distal balloon could diagnose endometriosis in patients with suspected rectovaginal septal endometriosis, including rectal wall infiltration, prior to surgery. In 30 patients, endoscopic ultrasonography found rectovaginal septum endometriosis in 88% and rectal wall infiltration in 56%, while surgical exploration confirmed rectovaginal septum disease in 26 cases and rectal infiltration as complete in 12 and partial in 4, with bowel resection needed in 10. Reported sensitivity/specificity for detecting rectovaginal septum endometriosis and rectal wall infiltration were high for septum involvement (sensitivity 96%, specificity 100%) and more moderate for rectal wall infiltration (sensitivity 83%, specificity 92%), but sensitivity was lower for nodules in the uterosacral ligaments and ovaries. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it assesses the diagnostic value of endorectal ultrasonography for rectovaginal septal endometriosis infiltrating the rectum.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Rectovaginal septal endometriosis (RVSE) can pose serious therapeutic problems when there is infiltration of the rectal septum (which occurs in approximately half of the cases). The aim of this study was to assess the value of endoscopic ultrasonography in diagnosing rectal wall involvement by pelvic endometriosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was carried out from May 1998 to March 2003 at a single hospital center. The 30 patients included in the study presented with suspected RVSE and underwent systematic anorectal endoscopic ultrasonographic exploration prior to the surgical intervention. The endoscopic ultrasonography was carried out under general anesthesia with a 7.5-MHz miniprobe equipped with a distal balloon. RESULTS: The anorectal endoscopic ultrasonographic examination (EUS) showed the presence of endometriosis in the rectovaginal septum in 26 patients (88 %), in the uterosacral ligaments in 10 patients (33 %), and in the ovaries in two patients (6 %). At EUS, the nodules were infiltrating the rectal wall in 17 patients (56 %). The surgical exploration demonstrated endometriosis in the rectovaginal septum in 26 cases, the uterosacral ligaments in 22 cases, and the ovaries in 16 cases. The rectal wall was completely infiltrated in 12 cases and only partly in four cases, and intestinal tract resection was required in 10 cases. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of anorectal endoscopic ultrasonography as a means of diagnosing endometriosis of the rectovaginal septum and infiltration of the rectal wall were found to be 96 %, 100 %, 100 % and 83 %, and 92 %, 66 %, 64 % and 92 %, respectively; and the diagnostic accuracy was at 96 % and 80 %, respectively. The sensitivity for detecting nodules in the uterosacral ligaments or in the ovaries was 42 % and 14 %, respectively, leading to diagnostic accuracy rates of 56 % and 53 %. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of its sensitivity and its negative predictive value, anorectal endoscopic ultrasonography is a very effective means of detecting endometriosis of the rectovaginal septum and assessing possible infiltration of the rectal wall. However, this method is not as accurate for nodules located far from the EUS probe, as is the case with the uterosacral ligaments and ovaries.
Full text 6,989 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Background

and Study Aims: Rectovaginal septal endometriosis (RVSE) can pose serious therapeutic problems when there is infiltration of the rectal septum (which occurs in approximately half of the cases). The aim of this study was to assess the value of endoscopic ultrasonography in diagnosing rectal wall involvement by pelvic endometriosis. Patients and Methods: A prospective study was carried out from May 1998 to March 2003 at a single hospital center. The 30 patients included in the study presented with suspected RVSE and underwent systematic anorectal endoscopic ultrasonographic exploration prior to the surgical intervention. The endoscopic ultrasonography was carried out under general anesthesia with a 7.5-MHz miniprobe equipped with a distal balloon.

Results

The anorectal endoscopic ultrasonographic examination (EUS) showed the presence of endometriosis in the rectovaginal septum in 26 patients (88 %), in the uterosacral ligaments in 10 patients (33 %), and in the ovaries in two patients (6 %). At EUS, the nodules were infiltrating the rectal wall in 17 patients (56 %). The surgical exploration demonstrated endometriosis in the rectovaginal septum in 26 cases, the uterosacral ligaments in 22 cases, and the ovaries in 16 cases. The rectal wall was completely infiltrated in 12 cases and only partly in four cases, and intestinal tract resection was required in 10 cases. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of anorectal endoscopic ultrasonography as a means of diagnosing endometriosis of the rectovaginal septum and infiltration of the rectal wall were found to be 96 %, 100 %, 100 % and 83 %, and 92 %, 66 %, 64 % and 92 %, respectively; and the diagnostic accuracy was at 96 % and 80 %, respectively. The sensitivity for detecting nodules in the uterosacral ligaments or in the ovaries was 42 % and 14 %, respectively, leading to diagnostic accuracy rates of 56 % and 53 %.

Conclusions

In terms of its sensitivity and its negative predictive value, anorectal endoscopic ultrasonography is a very effective means of detecting endometriosis of the rectovaginal septum and assessing possible infiltration of the rectal wall. However, this method is not as accurate for nodules located far from the EUS probe, as is the case with the uterosacral ligaments and ovaries.

References

- 1 Camagna O, Dupuis O, Soncini E. et al . Surgical treatment of rectovaginal septum endometriosis in infiltrating endometriosis: from a continuous series of 40 cases. Acta Endosc. 2002; 32 47-53 - 2 Cornillie F J, Oosterlynck D, Lauweryns J M, Koninckx P R. Deeply infiltrating pelvic endometriosis: histology and clinical significance. Fertil Steril. 1990; 53 978-983 - 3 Martin D C, Hubert G D, Levy B S. Depth of infiltration of endometriosis. J Gynecol Surg. 1989; 5 55-60 - 4 Dumontier I, Roseau G, Vincent B. et al . Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in pelvic endometriosis. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2000; 24 1197-1204 - 5 Koninckx R P, Meuleman C, Demeyere S. et al . Suggestive evidence that pelvic endometriosis is a progressive disease, whereas deeply infiltrating endometriosis is associated with pelvic pain. Fertil Steril. 1991; 55 759-765 - 6 Nezhat F, Nezhat C, Pennington E. Laparoscopic treatment of infiltrating rectosigmoid colon and rectovaginal septum endometriosis by the technique of videolaparoscopy and the CO2 laser. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 99 664-667 - 7 Candiani G B, Vercellini P, Fedele L. et al . Conservative surgical treatment of rectovaginal septum endometriosis. J Gynecol Surg. 1992; 8 177-182 - 8 Chapron C, Dubuisson J B, Tardif D. et al . Retroperitoneal endometriosis infiltrating the utero-sacral ligaments: technique and results of laparoscopic surgery. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 1997; 26 264-269 - 9 Chapron C, Jacob S, Dubuisson J B. et al . Laparoscopically assisted vaginal management of deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectovaginal septum. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001; 80 349-354 - 10 Donnez J, Nisolle M, Gillerot S. et al . Rectovaginal septum adenomyotic nodules: a series of 500 cases. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 104 1014-1018 - 11 Koninckx R P, Timmermans B, Meuleman C. et al . Complications of CO2 laser endoscopic excision of deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 1996; 11 2263-2268 - 12 Martin D C. Laparoscopic and vaginal colpotomy for the excision of infiltrating cul-de-sac endometriosis. J Reprod Med. 1988; 33 806-808 - 13 Possover M, Plaul K, Schneider A. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal resection of rectovaginal endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 96 304-307 - 14 Redwine D B. Conservative laparoscopic excision of endometriosis by sharp dissection: life table analysis of reoperation and persistent or recurrent disease. Fertil Steril. 1991; 56 628-634 - 15 Redwine D B. Laparoscopic en bloc resection for treatment of the obliterated cul-de-sac in endometriosis. J Reprod Med. 1992; 37 695-698 - 16 Reich H, Glynn F, Salvat J. Laparoscopic treatment of cul-de-sac obliteration secondary to retrocervical deep fibrotic endometriosis. J Reprod Med. 1991; 36 516-522 - 17 Fedele L, Bianchi S, Portuese A. et al . Transrectal ultrasonography in the assessment of rectovaginal endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 91 444-448 - 18 Schröder J, Löhnert M, Doniec J M. et al . Endoluminal ultrasound diagnosis and operative management of rectal endometriosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997; 40 614-617 - 19 Roseau G, Dumontier I, Palazzo L. et al . Rectosigmoid endometriosis: endoscopic ultrasound features and clinical implications. Endoscopy. 2000; 32 525-30 - 20 Tran K T, Kuijpers H C, Willemsen W N. et al . Surgical treatment of symptomatic rectosigmoid endometriosis. Eur J Surg. 1996; 162 139-141 - 21 Jenkins S, Olive D L, Haney A F. Endometriosis: pathogenetic implications of the anatomic distribution. Obstet Gynecol. 1986; 67 335-338 - 22 Redwine D B. The distribution of endometriosis in the pelvis by age groups and fertility. Fertil Streril. 1987; 47 173-175 - 23 Weed J C, Ray J E. Endometriosis of the bowel. Obstet Gynecol. 1987; 69 727-730 - 24 Zwas F R, Lyon D T. Endometriosis: an important condition in clinical gastroenterology. Dig Dis Sci. 1991; 36 353-364 - 25 Decocq J. Echographie de l’endométriose. J Echogr Med Ultrason. 1997; 18 15-23 - 26 Gorell H A, Cyr D R, Wang K Y, Greer B E. Rectosigmoid endometriosis: diagnosis using endovaginal sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 1989; 8 459-461 - 27 Togashi K, Nishimura K, Kimura I. et al . Endometrial cysts: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology. 1991; 180 73-78 M. Barthet, M. D. Dept. of Gastroenterology · Hôpital Nord 13915 Marseilles · France Fax: +33-4-91961311 Email: [email protected]

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endosonography Ovarian Diseases Rectal Diseases Uterine Diseases Vaginal Diseases Adult Broad Ligament Broad Ligament Broad Ligament Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Humans Middle Aged Ovarian Diseases Ovarian Diseases Predictive Value of Tests Prospective Studies Rectal Diseases

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

Cited by (50)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-28T06:14:09.330459+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:15:41.664291+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK