Bowel resection for intestinal endometriosis

David R. Urbach, Michael Reedijk, Carole Richard, K.I. Lie, Theodore Ross
In: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · 1998 · vol. 41(9) , pp. 1158–1164 · doi:10.1007/bf02239439 · W2084501514
OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 93 in-corpus citations
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

This study evaluated bowel resection for intestinal endometriosis, finding that concomitant total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingooophorectomy correlated with a better outcome.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-09 · read from full text ⓘ

This retrospective study evaluated predictors of clinical outcomes for patients undergoing bowel resection due to severe endometriosis with intestinal involvement. The researchers analyzed chart data and conducted follow-up interviews for twenty-nine women who underwent surgical intervention between 1992 and 1996 at a single institution. Results indicated that while all patients reported subjective improvement, only forty-six percent achieved complete cure, which was significantly associated with the concomitant performance of total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically focusing on surgical management and prognostic factors for deep infiltrating disease affecting the bowel.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

PURPOSE: The study contained herein was undertaken to evaluate which factors predict a good outcome following intestinal resection for endometriosis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing bowel resection for severe (American Fertility Society Stage IV) endometriosis at one institution between the years 1992 and 1996 was conducted using systematic chart review and follow-up by telephone interview. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were identified within the study period. The most frequent symptoms were pelvic pain, abdominal pain, rectal pain, and dysmenorrhea. Nearly all patients (93 percent) underwent low anterior resection of the rectum and distal sigmoid. Other intestinal procedures were appendectomy, terminal ileal resection, cecectomy, and sigmoid resection. Thirty-four percent of patients had simultaneous total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingooophorectomy. Complete follow-up was obtained on 26 patients (90 percent; mean follow-up 22.6 (range, 8-63) months). All patients (100 percent) reported subjective improvement. Forty-six percent of patients were “cured” according to the prospectively applied definition (resolution of symptoms without need for further medical or surgical therapy). The only variable analyzed that was associated with “cure” was concomitant total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingooophorectomy (odds ratio, 12; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.8-81.7). This association remained significant after correcting for age and the presence of gastrointestinal symptoms. CONCLUSION: Intestinal resection can be performed safely in most women with severe endometriosis and bowel involvement, although many of these patients experience persistent or recurrent symptoms. Total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingooophorectomy at the time of bowel resection correlates with improved outcome.
Full text 2,009 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 3 sections · click to expand

Methods

A retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing bowel resection for severe (American Fertility Society Stage IV) endometriosis at one institution between the years 1992 and 1996 was conducted using systematic chart review and follow-up by telephone interview.

Results

Twenty-nine patients were identified within the study period. The most frequent symptoms were pelvic pain, abdominal pain, rectal pain, and dysmenorrhea. Nearly all patients (93 percent) underwent low anterior resection of the rectum and distal sigmoid. Other intestinal procedures were appendectomy, terminal ileal resection, cecectomy, and sigmoid resection. Thirty-four percent of patients had simultaneous total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingooophorectomy. Complete follow-up was obtained on 26 patients (90 percent; mean follow-up 22.6 (range, 8-63) months). All patients (100 percent) reported subjective improvement. Forty-six percent of patients were “cured” according to the prospectively applied definition (resolution of symptoms without need for further medical or surgical therapy). The only variable analyzed that was associated with “cure” was concomitant total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingooophorectomy (odds ratio, 12; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.8-81.7). This association remained significant after correcting for age and the presence of gastrointestinal symptoms.

Conclusion

Intestinal resection can be performed safely in most women with severe endometriosis and bowel involvement, although many of these patients experience persistent or recurrent symptoms. Total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingooophorectomy at the time of bowel resection correlates with improved outcome.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisdysmenorrhea

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (26)

Cited by (50)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-13T06:25:51.201866+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK