Outcomes after rectosigmoid resection for endometriosis: a systematic literature review

review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 42 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-28

This systematic review analyzed 38 articles and 3,079 patients, finding rectosigmoid resection for endometriosis to be a feasible and safe technique with an 18.5% overall postoperative complication rate.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-09 · read from full text

This systematic literature review studied postoperative outcomes after rectosigmoid resection for endometriosis, using PubMed search terms “rectal resection” and “rectosigmoid resection” combined with endometriosis and analyzing 38 articles published between 1998 and 2017. Across 3,079 patients (mean age ~34), most procedures were laparoscopic (90.3%), with an overall conversion rate of 2.7%, operative time of about 238 minutes, and intraoperative complications in ~1% of cases. Overall postoperative complications occurred in 18.5%, with recto-vaginal fistula reported as the most frequent complication (2.4%); mortality was 0.03% and mean hospital stay was ~9 days, though many patients had associated procedures. The paper’s main limitation is the wide variety of included study types and associated procedures, with no single standardized approach reported. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it systematically reviews surgical outcomes after rectosigmoid resection for deeply infiltrating intestinal endometriosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Purpose"Endometriosis" is defined such as the presence of endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterine cavity. This ectopic condition may develop as deeply infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) when a solid mass is located deeper than 5 mm underneath the peritoneum including the intestinal wall. The ideal surgical treatment is still under search, and treatment may range from simple shaving to rectal resection. The aim of the present systematic review is to report and analyze the postoperative outcomes after rectosigmoid resection for endometriosis.MethodsWe performed a systematic review according to Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. The search was carried out in the PubMed database, using the keywords: "rectal resection" AND "endometriosis" and "rectosigmoid resection" AND "endometriosis." The search revealed 380 papers of which 78 were fully analyzed.ResultsThirty-eight articles published between 1998 and 2017 were included. Three thousand seventy-nine patients (mean age 34.28 ± 2.46) were included. Laparoscopic approach was the most employed (90.3%) followed by the open one (7.9%) and the robotic one (1.7%). Overall operative time was 238.47 ± 66.82. Conversion rate was 2.7%. In more than 80% of cases, associated procedures were performed. Intraoperative complications were observed in 1% of cases. The overall postoperative complications rate was 18.5% (571 patients), and the most frequent complication was recto-vaginal fistula (74 patients, 2.4%). Postoperative mortality rate was 0.03% and mean hospital stay was 8.88 ± 3.71 days.ConclusionsDespite the large and extremely various number of associated procedures, rectosigmoid resection is a feasible and safe technique to treat endometriosis.
Full text 19,231 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Purpose “Endometriosis” is defined such as the presence of endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterine cavity. This ectopic condition may develop as deeply infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) when a solid mass is located deeper than 5 mm underneath the peritoneum including the intestinal wall. The ideal surgical treatment is still under search, and treatment may range from simple shaving to rectal resection. The aim of the present systematic review is to report and analyze the postoperative outcomes after rectosigmoid resection for endometriosis.

Methods

We performed a systematic review according to Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. The search was carried out in the PubMed database, using the keywords: “rectal resection” AND “endometriosis” and “rectosigmoid resection” AND “endometriosis.” The search revealed 380 papers of which 78 were fully analyzed.

Results

Thirty-eight articles published between 1998 and 2017 were included. Three thousand seventy-nine patients (mean age 34.28 ± 2.46) were included. Laparoscopic approach was the most employed (90.3%) followed by the open one (7.9%) and the robotic one (1.7%). Overall operative time was 238.47 ± 66.82. Conversion rate was 2.7%. In more than 80% of cases, associated procedures were performed. Intraoperative complications were observed in 1% of cases. The overall postoperative complications rate was 18.5% (571 patients), and the most frequent complication was recto-vaginal fistula (74 patients, 2.4%). Postoperative mortality rate was 0.03% and mean hospital stay was 8.88 ± 3.71 days.

Conclusions

Despite the large and extremely various number of associated procedures, rectosigmoid resection is a feasible and safe technique to treat endometriosis. Similar content being viewed by others Change history 09 July 2018 The authors of the published version of this article missed to add the second affiliation of Mostafa Shalaby. The new affiliation is now added and presented correctly in this article. The remainder of the article remains unchanged.

References

Vercellini P, Viganò P, Somigliana E, Fedele L (2014) Endometriosis: pathogenesis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol 10(5):261–275. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2013.255 Kamergorodsky G, Lemos N, Rodrigues FC, Asanuma FY, D'Amora P, Schor E, Girão MJ (2015 Aug) Evaluation of pre- and post-operative symptoms in patients submitted to linear stapler nodulectomy due to anterior rectal wall endometriosis. Surg Endosc 29(8):2389–2393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3945-4 Riiskjær M, Forman A, Kesmodel US, Andersen LM, Ljungmann K, Seyer-Hansen M (2017) Diagnostic value of serial measurement of C-reactive protein in the detection of a surgical complication after laparoscopic bowel resection for endometriosis. Gynecol Obstet Investig 82(4):410–416. https://doi.org/10.1159/000447513 Roman H, Abo C, Huet E, Bridoux V, Auber M, Oden S, Marpeau L, Tuech JJ (2015) Full-thickness disc excision in deep endometriotic nodules of the rectum: a prospective cohort. Dis Colon rectum Oct 58(10):957–966. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000447 Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283(15):2008–2012 Lo CK, Mertz D, Loeb M (2014) Newcastle-Ottawa Scale: comparing reviewers’ to authors’ assessments. BMC Med Res Methodol 14:45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-45 Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I (2005) Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 5:13 Urbach DR, Reedijk M, Richard CS, Lie KI, Ross TM (1998) Bowel resection for intestinal endometriosis. Dis Colon Rectum Sep 41(9):1158–1164 Darai E, Thomassin I, Barranger E, Detchev R, Cortez A, Houry S, Bazot M (2005) Feasibility and clinical outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection for endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol Feb 192(2):394–400 Campagnacci R, Perretta S, Guerrieri M, Paganini AM, De Sanctis A, Ciavattini A, Lezoche E. (2005). Laparoscopic colorectal resection for endometriosis. Surg Endosc 19(5):662–664 Abrao MS, Sagae UE, Gonzales M, Podgaec S, Dias JA Jr. (2005). Treatment of rectosigmoid endometriosis by laparoscopically assisted vaginal rectosigmoidectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet;91(1):27–31 Dubernard G, Piketty M, Rouzier R, Houry S, Bazot M, Darai E (2006) Quality of life after laparoscopic colorectal resection for endometriosis. Hum Reprod 21(5):1243–1247 Ribeiro PA, Rodrigues FC, Kehdi IP, Rossini L, Abdalla HS, Donadio N, Aoki T (2006) Laparoscopic resection of intestinal endometriosis: a 5-year experience. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13(5):442–446 Seracchioli R, Poggioli G, Pierangeli F, Manuzzi L, Gualerzi B, Savelli L, Remorgida V, Mabrouk M, Venturoli S (2007) Surgical outcome and long-term follow up after laparoscopic rectosigmoid resection in women with deep infiltrating endometriosis. BJOG 114(7):889–895 Zanetti-Dällenbach R, Bartley J, Müller C, Schneider A, Köhler C (2008) Combined vaginal-laparoscopic-abdominal approach for the surgical treatment of rectovaginal endometriosis with bowel resection: a comparison of this new technique with various established approaches by laparoscopy and laparotomy, 22. Surg Endosc (4):995–1001 Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Ciravolo G, Rampinelli F, Braga M, Boni L (2008) A new laparoscopic-transvaginal technique for rectosigmoid resection in patients with endometriosis. Fertil Steril Nov 90(5):1964–1968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.09.002 Minelli L, Fanfani F, Fagotti A, Ruffo G, Ceccaroni M, Mereu L, Landi S, Pomini P, Scambia G (2009) Laparoscopic colorectal resection for bowel endometriosis: feasibility, complications, and clinical outcome. Arch Surg 144(3):234–239; discussion 239. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2008.555 De Nardi P, Osman N, Ferrari S, Carlucci M, Persico P, Staudacher C (2009) Laparoscopic treatment of deep pelvic endometriosis with rectal involvement. Dis Colon Rectum 52(3):419–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e318197d716 Bracale U, Azioni G, Rosati M, Barone M, Pignata G (2009) Deep pelvic endometriosis (Adamyan IV stage): multidisciplinary laparoscopic treatments. Acta Chir Iugosl 56(1):41–46 Kim JS, Hur H, Min BS, Kim H, Sohn SK, Cho CH, Kim NK (2009) Intestinal endometriosis mimicking carcinoma of rectum and sigmoid colon: a report of five cases. Yonsei Med J 50(5):732–735. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2009.50.5.732 Kössi J, Setälä M, Enholm B, Luostarinen M (2010) The early outcome of laparoscopic sigmoid and rectal resection for endometriosis. Colorectal Dis 12(3):232–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14631318.2009.01923.x Dousset B, Leconte M, Borghese B, Millischer AE, Roseau G, Arkwright S, Chapron C (2010) Complete surgery for low rectal endometriosis: long-term results of a 100-case prospective study. Ann Surg May 251(5):887–895. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d9722d Daraï E, Dubernard G, Coutant C, Frey C, Rouzier R, Ballester M (2010) Randomized trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open colorectal resection for endometriosis: morbidity, symptoms, quality of life, and fertility. Ann Surg 251(6):1018–1023. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d9691d Roman H, Rozsnayi F, Puscasiu L, Resch B, Belhiba H, Lefebure B, Scotte M, Michot F, Marpeau L, Tuech JJ. (2010). Complications associated with two laparoscopic procedures used in the management of rectal endometriosis. JSLS. Apr-Jun;14(2):169–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.4293/108680810X12785289143800 Moawad NS, Guido R, Ramanathan R, Mansuria S, Lee T (2011) Comparison of laparoscopic anterior discoid resection and laparoscopic low anterior resection of deep infiltrating rectosigmoid endometriosis. JSLS 15(3):331–338. https://doi.org/10.4293/108680811X13125733356431 Lim PC, Kang E, do Park H (2011) Robot-assisted total intracorporeal low anterior resection with primary anastomosis and radical dissection for treatment of stage IV endometriosis with bowel involvement: morbidity and its outcome. J Robot Surg 5(4):273–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-011-0272-9 Ruffo G, Sartori A, Crippa S, Partelli S, Barugola G, Manzoni A, Steinasserer M, Minelli L, Falconi M (2012) Laparoscopic rectal resection for severe endometriosis of the mid and low rectum: technique and operative results. Surg Endosc 26(4):1035–1040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1991-8 Ceccaroni M, Clarizia R, Bruni F, D'Urso E, Gagliardi ML, Roviglione G, Minelli L, Ruffo G (2012) Nerve-sparing laparoscopic eradication of deep endometriosis with segmental rectal and parametrial resection: the Negrar method. A single-center, prospective, clinical trial. Surg Endosc 26(7):2029–2045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2153-3 Vitobello D, Fattizzi N, Santoro G, Rosati R, Baldazzi G, Bulletti C, Palmara V (2013) Robotic surgery and standard laparoscopy: a surgical hybrid technique for use in colorectal endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 39(1):217–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2012.01891.x Kössi J, Setälä M, Mäkinen J, Härkki P, Luostarinen M (2013) Quality of life and sexual function 1 year after laparoscopic rectosigmoid resection for endometriosis. Colorectal Dis 15(1):102–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03111.x Neme RM, Schraibman V, Okazaki S, Maccapani G, Chen WJ, Domit CD, Kaufmann OG, Advincula AP (2013) Deep infiltrating colorectal endometriosis treated with robotic-assisted rectosigmoidectomy. JSLS 17(2):227–234. https://doi.org/10.4293/108680813X13693422521836 Cassini D, Cerullo G, Miccini M, Manoochehri F, Ercoli A, Baldazzi G (2014) Robotic hybrid technique in rectal surgery for deep pelvic endometriosis. Surg Innov 21(1):52–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350613487804 Fleisch MC, Hepp P, Kaleta T, Schulte A, Esch J, Rein D, Fehm T, Beyer I (2014) Feasibility and first long-term results after laparoscopic rectal segment resection and vaginal specimen retrieval for deep infiltrating endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289(6):1241–1247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3146-3 Mangler M, Herbstleb J, Mechsner S, Bartley J, Schneider A, Köhler C (2014) Long-term follow-up and recurrence rate after mesorectum-sparing bowel resection among women with rectovaginal endometriosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 125(3):266–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.12.010 English J, Sajid MS, Lo J, Hudelist G, Baig MK, Miles WA (2014) Limited segmental rectal resection in the treatment of deeply infiltrating rectal endometriosis: 10 years’ experience from a tertiary referral unit. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2(4):288–294. https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/gou055 Akladios C, Messori P, Faller E, Puga M, Afors K, Leroy J, Wattiez A (2015) Is ileostomy always necessary following rectal resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis? J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22(1):103–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2014.08.001 Tarjanne S, Heikinheimo O, Mentula M, Härkki P (2015) Complications and long-term follow-up on colorectal resections in the treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis extending to bowel wall. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 94(1):72–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12515 Rausei S, Sambucci D, Spampatti S, Cassinotti E, Dionigi G, David G, Ghezzi F, Uccella S, Boni L (2015) Laparoscopic treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis: results of the combined laparoscopic gynecologic and colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 29(10):2904–2909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-4018-4 Milone M, Vignali A, Milone F, Pignata G, Elmore U, Musella M, De Placido G, Mollo A, Fernandez LM, Coretti G, Bracale U, Rosati R. (2015). Colorectal resection in deep pelvic endometriosis: Surgical technique and post-operative complications. World J Gastroenterol;21(47):13345–13351. doi:https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i47.13345 Malzoni M, Di Giovanni A, Exacoustos C, Lannino G, Capece R, Perone C, Rasile M, Iuzzolino D (2016) Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic-assisted bowel segmental resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis: a retrospective cohort study with description of technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23(4):512–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.09.024 Roman H, Hennetier C, Darwish B, Badescu A, Csanyi M, Aziz M, Tuech JJ, Abo C (2016) Bowel occult microscopic endometriosis in resection margins in deep colorectal endometriosis specimens has no impact on short-term postoperative outcomes. Fertil Steril 105(2):423–9.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.09.030 Riiskjaer M, Greisen S, Glavind-Kristensen M, Kesmodel US, Forman A, Seyer-Hansen M (2016) Pelvic organ function before and after laparoscopic bowel resection for rectosigmoid endometriosis: a prospective, observational study. BJOG 123(8):1360–1367. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13975 Roman H, Milles M, Vassilieff M, Resch B, Tuech JJ, Huet E, Darwish B, Abo C. (2016). Long-term functional outcomes following colorectal resection versus shaving for rectal endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol;215(6):762.e1–762762.e9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.055 Vlek SL, Lier MCI, Koedam TWA, Melgers I, Dekker JJML, Bonjer JH, Mijatovic V, Tuynman JB (2017) Transanal minimally invasive rectal resection for deep endometriosis: a promising technique. Colorectal Dis 19(6):576–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13569 Renner SP, Kessler H, Topal N, Proske K, Adler W, Burghaus S, Haupt W, Beckmann MW, Lermann J (2017) Major and minor complications after anterior rectal resection for deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295(5):1277–1285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4360-6 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group (2010) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 8(5):336–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007 Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196 Kalogera E, Nitschmann CC, Dowdy SC, Cliby WA, Langstraat CL. (2017). A prospective algorithm to reduce anastomotic leaks after rectosigmoid resection for gynecologic malignancies. Gynecol Oncol 2017;144(2):343–347. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.11.032 Abo C, Moatassim S, Marty N, Saint Ghislain M, Huet E, Bridoux V, Tuech JJ, Roman H (2018) Postoperative complications after bowel endometriosis surgery by shaving, disc excision, or segmental resection: a three-arm comparative analysis of 364 consecutive cases. Fertil Steril 2018 109(1):172–178.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.001 Afors K, Centini G, Fernandes R, Murtada R, Zupi E, Akladios C, Wattiez A (2016) Segmental and Discoid Resection are Preferential to Bowel Shaving for Medium-Term Symptomatic Relief in Patients With Bowel Endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2016 23(7):1123–1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.813 Roman H, Bubenheim M, Huet E, Bridoux V, Zacharopoulou C, Daraï E, Collinet P, Tuech JJ (2018) Conservative surgery versus colorectal resection in deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum: a randomized trial. Hum Reprod 33(1):47–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex336 Rex JC Jr, Khubchandani IT (1992) Rectovaginal fistula: complication of low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 35(4):354–356 Kosugi C, Saito N, Kimata Y, Ono M, Sugito M, Ito M, Sato K, Koda K, Miyazaki M (2005) Rectovaginal fistulas after rectal cancer surgery: incidence and operative repair by gluteal-fold flap repair. Surgery 137(3):329–336 Antonsen HK, Kronborg O (1987) Early complications after low anterior resection for rectal cancer using the EEA stapling device. A prospective trial Dis Colon rectum 30(8):579–583 Arbman G (1993) Rectovaginal fistulas and the double-stapling technique. Dis Colon Rectum 36(3):310–311 Baran JJ, Goldstein SD, Resnik AM (1992) The double-staple technique in colorectal anastomosis: a critical review. Am Surg 58(4):270–272 Fleshner PR, Schoetz DJ Jr, Roberts PL, Murray JJ, Coller JA, Veidenheimer MC (1992) Anastomotic-vaginal fistula after colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 35(10):938–943 Nakagoe T, Sawai T, Tuji T, Nanashima A, Yamaguchi H, Yasutake T, Ayabe H (1999) Avoidance of rectovaginal fistula as a complication after low anterior resection for rectal cancerusing a double-stapling technique. J Surg Oncol 71(3):196–197 Sugarbaker PH (1996) Rectovaginal fistula following low circular stapled anastomosis in women with rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 61(2):155–158 Tsutsumi N, Yoshida Y, Maehara Y, Kohnoe S (2007) Rectovaginal fistula following double-stapling anastomosis in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 54(78):1682–1683 Watanabe J, Ota M, Kawaguchi D, Shima H, Kaida S, Osada S, Kamimukai N, Kamiya N, Ishibe A, Watanabe K, Matsuyama R, Akiyama H, Ichikawa Y, Oba M, Endo I (2015) Incidence and risk factors for rectovaginal fistula after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 30(12):1659–1666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2340-5 Paun BC, Cassie S, MacLean AR, Dixon E, Buie WD (2010) Postoperative complications following surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 251(5):807–818. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181dae4ed Fujita F, Torashima Y, Kuroki T, Eguchi S (2014) Risk factors and predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for colorectal cancer: reappraisal of the literature. Surg Today 44(9):1595–1602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-013-0685-3 Hayden DM, Mora Pinzon MC, Francescatti AB, Saclarides TJ (2014) Patient factors may predict anastomotic complications after rectal cancer surgery: anastomotic complications in rectal cancer. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 4(1):11–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2014.12.002 Paganini AM, Balla A, Quaresima S, D'Ambrosio G, Bruzzone P, Lezoche E (2015) Tricks to decrease the suture line dehiscence rate during endoluminal loco-regional resection (ELRR) by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Surg Endosc 29(5):1045–1050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3776-3 Kobayashi M, Mohri Y, Ohi M, Inoue Y, Araki T, Okita Y, Kusunoki M (2014) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage and favorable antimicrobial treatment as empirical therapy for intra-abdominal infection in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Surg Today 44(3):487–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-013-0575-8 Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Ethics declarations Conflict of interest Andrea Balla, Silvia Quaresima, José D. Subiela, Mostafa Shalaby, Giuseppe Petrella, and Pierpaolo Sileri have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Balla, A., Quaresima, S., Subiela, J.D. et al. Outcomes after rectosigmoid resection for endometriosis: a systematic literature review. Int J Colorectal Dis 33, 835–847 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3082-y Accepted: Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3082-y

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Laparoscopy Robotic Surgical Procedures Endometriosis Female Humans Proctocolectomy, Restorative Rectal Diseases Treatment Outcome

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (69)

Cited by (43)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-25T06:15:30.875455+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:19:49.066213+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK