Quality of life and low anterior resection syndrome before and after deep endometriosis surgery

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 4 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite+body, 2026-06-07

This study assessed gastrointestinal outcomes and quality of life in deep endometriosis patients before and after surgery, finding improved quality of life irrespective of rectal surgery technique.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

This prospective 2017–2019 study evaluated gastrointestinal functional outcomes and quality of life in 82 patients undergoing surgery for deep endometriosis, including those with and without rectal resection, using the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score and the SF-36 questionnaire before surgery and at 6 months and 1 year after surgery. The key findings were that SF-36 scores improved across all eight domains at follow-up in all patients (p ≤ 0.05), while LARS scores for patients without rectal surgery increased numerically from baseline to 1 year, and rectal-surgery patients had no significant differences in postoperative LARS scores across three rectal surgical techniques (p = 0.97), with SF-36 improvements occurring regardless of technique. A major limitation stated from the abstract is that LARS comparisons did not reach significance in some groups (e.g., p = 0.17), indicating limited detectable differences. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically assessing LARS-like bowel dysfunction and SF-36 quality-of-life changes before and after deep endometriosis surgery involving rectal resection.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

PURPOSE: Deep endometriosis (DE) is defined by the presence of ectopic endometrial glands, with rectal involvement ranging from 5.3 to 12%. The prevalence of low anterior resection-like syndrome (LARS) in patients with DE, how it affects quality of life (QoL), and its evolution after surgery is unclear. The objective of this study was to assess the gastrointestinal functional outcomes and QoL in patients who underwent surgery for DE. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted from 2017 to 2019, recruiting patients who underwent DE surgery with and without rectal resection. Patients completed LARS and SF-36 questionnaires before, at 6 months and at 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were enrolled. Rectal segmental resection was required in 16 (19.5%) patients, shaving in 16 (19.5%) and discoid resection in 8 (9.8%). All 8 domains of the SF-36 questionnaire showed improvement during follow-up, reflecting improved QoL after surgery (p ≤ 0.05) in all patients. Mean LARS scores for patients without rectal surgery were 7.5 ± 10.4 before and 13.7 ± 14.2 1 year after surgery; rectal surgery was 13.6 ± 13.6 and 14.6 ± 13.1, respectively (p = 0.17). No significant differences were found in the rectal surgery patients' postoperative LARS score among the 3 rectal DE surgical techniques (p = 0.97), and the SF-36 scores improved independent of the technique performed. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with DE present a LARS-like syndrome before surgery that does not appear to be negatively affected after rectal surgery, independent of the technique performed. Rectal surgery improves the QoL of patients with DE patients as measured by the SF-36 questionnaire at 1 year of follow-up.
Full text 10,359 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Purpose Deep endometriosis (DE) is defined by the presence of ectopic endometrial glands, with rectal involvement ranging from 5.3 to 12%. The prevalence of low anterior resection–like syndrome (LARS) in patients with DE, how it affects quality of life (QoL), and its evolution after surgery is unclear. The objective of this study was to assess the gastrointestinal functional outcomes and QoL in patients who underwent surgery for DE. Patients and methods A prospective study was conducted from 2017 to 2019, recruiting patients who underwent DE surgery with and without rectal resection. Patients completed LARS and SF-36 questionnaires before, at 6 months and at 1 year after surgery.

Results

Eighty-two patients were enrolled. Rectal segmental resection was required in 16 (19.5%) patients, shaving in 16 (19.5%) and discoid resection in 8 (9.8%). All 8 domains of the SF-36 questionnaire showed improvement during follow-up, reflecting improved QoL after surgery (p ≤ 0.05) in all patients. Mean LARS scores for patients without rectal surgery were 7.5 ± 10.4 before and 13.7 ± 14.2 1 year after surgery; rectal surgery was 13.6 ± 13.6 and 14.6 ± 13.1, respectively (p = 0.17). No significant differences were found in the rectal surgery patients’ postoperative LARS score among the 3 rectal DE surgical techniques (p = 0.97), and the SF-36 scores improved independent of the technique performed.

Conclusions

Patients with DE present a LARS-like syndrome before surgery that does not appear to be negatively affected after rectal surgery, independent of the technique performed. Rectal surgery improves the QoL of patients with DE patients as measured by the SF-36 questionnaire at 1 year of follow-up. Similar content being viewed by others Availability of data and material The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (SG) upon reasonable request.

References

Falcone T, Lebovic DI (2011) Clinical management of endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol 118(3):691–705 Balla A, Quaresima S, Subiela JD, Shalaby M, Petrella G, Sileri P (2018) Outcomes after rectosigmoid resection for endometriosis: a systematic literature review. Int J Colorectal Dis [cited 2018 Jun 23];33(7):835–47. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00384-018-3082-y Hernández Gutiérrez A, Spagnolo E, Zapardiel I, Garcia-AbadilloSeivane R, López Carrasco A, Salas Bolívar P et al (2019) Post-operative complications and recurrence rate after treatment of bowel endometriosis: comparison of three techniques. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 4:100083 Perandini A, Perandini S, Montemezzi S, Bonin C, Bellini G, Bergamini V (2018) Defining probabilities of bowel resection in deep endometriosis of the rectum: prediction with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 44(2):292–297 Bray-Beraldo F, Pereira AMG, Gazzo C, Santos MP, Lopes RGC (2018) Surgical treatment of intestinal endometriosis: outcomes of three different techniques. Rev Bras Ginecol e Obstet 40(7):390–396 Daraï E, Bazot M, Rouzier R, Houry S, Dubernard G (2007) Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection for endometriosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 19:308–13 Koninckx PR, Ussia A, Adamyan L, Wattiez A, Donnez J (2012) Deep endometriosis: definition, diagnosis, and treatment. Fertil Steril [cited 2021 Oct 29];98:564–71. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1061 Remorgida V, Ferrero S, Fulcheri E, Ragni N, Martin D (2007) Bowel endometriosis: presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. Obstet Gynecol Surv [cited 2021 Oct 29];62(7):461–70. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17572918/ Young S, Burns MK, Difrancesco L, Nezhat A, Nezhat C (2017) Diagnostic and treatment guidelines for gastrointestinal and genitourinary endometriosis. J Turkish Ger Gynecol Assoc 18(4):200–209 Culley L, Law C, Hudson N, Denny E, Mitchell H, Baumgarten M et al (2013) The social and psychological impact of endometriosis on women’s lives: a critical narrative review. Hum Reprod Update [cited 2021 Oct 28];19(6):625–39. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23884896/ Sepulcri Rde P, do Amaral V (2009) Depressive symptoms, anxiety, and quality of life in women with pelvic endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol [cited 2021 Oct 29];142(1):53–6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19010584/ Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Koga K, Missmer SA, Taylor RN, Viganò P (2018) Endometriosis. Nat Rev Dis Prim 2018 41 [cited 2021 Oct 28];4(1):1–25. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41572-018-0008-5 Riiskjær M, Egekvist A, Hartwell D, Forman A, Seyer-Hansen M, Kesmodel U (2017) Bowel endometriosis syndrome: a new scoring system for pelvic organ dysfunction and quality of life. Hum Reprod [cited 2021 Oct 29];32(9):1812–8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28854723/ Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S (2012) Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 255(5):922–928 Bokor A, Hudelist G, Dobó N, Dauser B, Farella M, Brubel R et al (2021) Low anterior resection syndrome following different surgical approaches for low rectal endometriosis: a retrospective multicenter study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 100(5):860–867 Scheepers WFW, Maas JWM, van de Kar MMA (2021) Bowel function and quality of life following surgery for deep endometriosis. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 0(0):1–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2021.1952570 Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213 Spagnolo E, Hernández A, Pascual I, Cabanes M, López A, Zapardiel I (2020) Bowel and ureteral assessment by indocyanine green real-time visualization during deep infiltrating endometriosis surgery – a video vignette. Color Dis [cited 2021 Oct 29];22(10):1464–5. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/codi.15093 Stull D, Wasiak R, Kreif N, Raluy M, Colligs A, Seitz C et al (2014) Validation of the SF-36 in patients with endometriosis. Qual Life Res [cited 2021 Oct 29];23(1):103–17. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23851974/ Alonso J, Regidor E, Barrio G, Prieto L, Rodríguez C de la FL (1998) Valores poblacionales de referencia de la versión española del Cuestionario de Salud SF-36 [Population reference values of the Spanish version of the Health Questionnaire SF-36]. Med Clin (Barc) 111(11):410–6. Spanish Coloma JL, Martínez-Zamora MA, Collado A, Gràcia M, Rius M, Quintas L et al (2019) Prevalence of fibromyalgia among women with deep infiltrating endometriosis. Int J Gynecol Obstet 146(2):157–163 Vieira X, Arcoverde L, Xmd X, Xmarina X, Andres P, Moys Es Borrelli X et al (2019) Surgery for endometriosis improves major domains of quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gyne-cology [cited 2021 Oct 26];26:278. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2018.09.774 Garavaglia E, Inversetti A, Ferrari S, De Nardi P, Candiani M (2018) Are symptoms after a colorectal segmental resection in deep endometriosis really improved? The point of view of women before and after surgery. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol [cited 2018 Mar 21];1–4. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29514537 Anaf V, El Nakadi I, Simon P, Van de Stadt J, Fayt I, Simonart T et al (2004) Preferential infiltration of large bowel endometriosis along the nerves of the colon. Hum Reprod [cited 2021 Oct 29];19(4):996–1002. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15016784/ Riiskjær M, Greisen S, Glavind-Kristensen M, Kesmodel US, Forman A, Seyer-Hansen M (2016) Pelvic organ function before and after laparoscopic bowel resection for rectosigmoid endometriosis: a prospective, observational study. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 123(8):1360–1367 Bray-Beraldo F, Pellino G, Ribeiro MAF, Pereira AMG, Lopes RGC, Mabrouk M et al (2021) Evaluation of bowel function after surgical treatment for intestinal endometriosis: a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 64(10):1267–1275 Uccella S, Marconi N, Casarin J, Ceccaroni M, Boni L, Sturla D et al (2016) Impact of endometriosis on surgical outcomes and complications of total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet [cited 2021 Oct 5];294(4):771–8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27168180/ Pieniowski E, Nordenvall C, Palmer G, Johar A, Tumlin Ekelund S, Lagergren P et al (2020) Prevalence of low anterior resection syndrome and impact on quality of life after rectal cancer surgery: population-based study. BJS Open [cited 2021 Oct 29];4(5):935–42. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32530135/ Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Ethics declarations Ethics approval All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Consent to participate Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Consent for publication Patients signed an informed consent document regarding publishing their data and photographs. Conflict of interest The authors declare no competing interests. Additional information Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. About this article Cite this article Gortázar de las Casas, S., Pascual Miguelañez, I., Spagnolo, E. et al. Quality of life and low anterior resection syndrome before and after deep endometriosis surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 407, 3671–3679 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02705-3 Received: Accepted: Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02705-3

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (27)

Cited by (4)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-20T06:14:21.026120+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-08-20T06:14:05.112396+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-20T06:30:07.000247+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK