Full robotic multivisceral resections: the Modena experience and literature review

review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite+body, 2026-06-08

This study presents initial experience with robotic multivisceral resections in 11 patients and reviews 156 robotic procedures, finding them safe and feasible in experienced hands but lacking standardization.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 · read from full text

The paper reports an initial case series from Modena (Jan 2018–Apr 2020) in which 11 patients underwent full robotic multivisceral abdominal resections, including combinations such as colorectal surgery with nephrectomy, other upper abdominal and urologic resections, and three resections for deep infiltrating endometriosis with colorectal involvement; it also includes a PubMed literature review up to April 2020. The combined experience found no intraoperative complications or conversions to open, with a mean operative time of 367 minutes and an overall postoperative complication rate of 18.2%, while the 26 included reports in the review (156 procedures total) were heterogeneous and did not allow standardization. A major limitation emphasized is the variability of included case reports/series, which prevents procedure standardization. Relevance to endometriosis: the authors specifically describe three deep infiltrating endometriosis resections with colorectal involvement among their cases and discuss robotic treatment of deep infiltrative colorectal endometriosis in the cited literature included in the review, though the paper’s main focus is full robotic multivisceral resections broadly.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The robotic platform is becoming a multidisciplinary tool, versatile, and suitable for multiple procedures. Combined multivisceral resections may represent an alternative to sequential procedures with a potential favorable impact on postoperative morbidity, and on the timing of administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. We herein present our initial experience with full robotic multivisceral resections, and a review of the literature available. Between January 2018 and April 2020, 11 patients underwent multivisceral full robotic abdominal surgery: 4 patients presented with two synchronous tumors, 4 with primary cancer associated with a benign condition and 3 cases involved deep infiltrating endometriosis. Surgical teams enrolled were: General Surgery, Urology and Gynecology. A systematic bibliographic research up to April 2020 was conducted in PubMed. 4 colorectal resections combined with partial or radical nephrectomy were performed, as well as 2 right colectomies in combination with right adrenalectomy and gastric banding removal, 2 radical prostatectomies with Nissen Fundoplication and abdominal wall hernia repair, and 3 resections of deep pelvic endometriosis with colorectal involvement. Mean total operative time was 367 min. No intraoperative complication or conversion to open was registered. Overall postoperative complication rate was 18.2%. 26 papers were included in the review (10 case series and 16 case reports) with a total of 156 combined multivisceral robotic procedures recorded. Robotic combined multivisceral resections proved to be safe and feasible when performed in high volume centers by expert surgeons. The heterogeneity of reports does not allow for a standardization of the procedure. Further studies and accumulation of experience are needed.
Full text 14,436 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

The robotic platform is becoming a multidisciplinary tool, versatile, and suitable for multiple procedures. Combined multivisceral resections may represent an alternative to sequential procedures with a potential favorable impact on postoperative morbidity, and on the timing of administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. We herein present our initial experience with full robotic multivisceral resections, and a review of the literature available. Between January 2018 and April 2020, 11 patients underwent multivisceral full robotic abdominal surgery: 4 patients presented with two synchronous tumors, 4 with primary cancer associated with a benign condition and 3 cases involved deep infiltrating endometriosis. Surgical teams enrolled were: General Surgery, Urology and Gynecology. A systematic bibliographic research up to April 2020 was conducted in PubMed. 4 colorectal resections combined with partial or radical nephrectomy were performed, as well as 2 right colectomies in combination with right adrenalectomy and gastric banding removal, 2 radical prostatectomies with Nissen Fundoplication and abdominal wall hernia repair, and 3 resections of deep pelvic endometriosis with colorectal involvement. Mean total operative time was 367 min. No intraoperative complication or conversion to open was registered. Overall postoperative complication rate was 18.2%. 26 papers were included in the review (10 case series and 16 case reports) with a total of 156 combined multivisceral robotic procedures recorded. Robotic combined multivisceral resections proved to be safe and feasible when performed in high volume centers by expert surgeons. The heterogeneity of reports does not allow for a standardization of the procedure. Further studies and accumulation of experience are needed. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Pullatt R, White BL (2020) Development and current state of robotic surgery. In: Living with robot. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815367-3.00005-0 Morelli L, Di Franco G, Guadagni S, Palmeri M, Gianardi D, Bianchini M et al (2017) Full robotic colorectal resections for cancer combined with other major surgical procedures: early experience with the da Vinci Xi. Surg Innov 24:321–327 Navarro J, Rho SY, Kang I, Choi GH, Min BS (2019) Robotic simultaneous resection for colorectal liver metastasis: feasibility for all types of liver resection. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 404:895–908 Park M, Kim SC, Chung J-S, Park SH, Park SS, Oh SJ, et al (2016) Simultaneous robotic low anterior resection and prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma of rectum and prostate: initial case report. Springerplus [Internet]. Springer International Publishing 5:1768. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27795910 Cartapatti M, Machado RD, Muller RL, Magnabosco WJ, Santos AC, Chapin BF et al (2018) Synchronous abdominal tumors: Is combined laparoscopic surgery in a single approach a safe option? Int Braz J Urol 44:483–490 Cochetti G, Tiezzi A, Spizzirri A, Giuliani D, Rossi De Vermandois JA, Maiolino G et al (2020) Simultaneous totally robotic rectal resection and partial nephrectomy: case report and review of literature. World J Surg Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01864-1 Perrin H, Ortega JC, Armando G, Brunner P, Hastier P, Dumas R et al (2015) Totally robotic combined right hemicolectomy and nephrectomy. J Robot Surg 9:153–156 Suh BJ, Oh SJ, Shin JY, Ku DH, Bae DS, Park JK (2017) Simultaneous robotic subtotal gastrectomy and right hemicolectomy for synchronous adenocarcinoma of stomach and colon. J Robot Surg 11:377–380 Soh JS, Joo JI, Park YH, Lim WS (2019) Robotic rectal cancer surgery simultaneously performed with combined abdominal surgeries. Asian J Surg. 42:1024–1027 Formisano G, Esposito S, Coratti F, Giuliani G, Salaj A, Bianchi PP (2019) Structured training program in colorectal surgery: The robotic surgeon as a new paradigm. Minerva Chir. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.18.07951-8 Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EVA, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I et al (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 346:1128–1137 Bastawrous A, Baer C, Rashidi L, Neighorn C (2018) Higher robotic colorectal surgery volume improves outcomes. Am J Surg 215:874–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.01.042 Byrn J, Hrabe J, Charlton M (2014) An initial experience with 85 consecutive robotic assisted rectal dissections. Surg Endosc 28:3101–3107 Buse S, Hach CE, Klumpen P, Schmitz K, Mager R, Mottrie A et al (2018) Cost-effectiveness analysis of robot-assisted vs. open partial nephrectomy. Int J Med Robot 14:e1920 Morelli L, Guadagni S, Lorenzoni V, Di Franco G, Cobuccio L, Palmeri M et al (2016) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer in a single surgeon’s experience: a cost analysis covering the initial 50 robotic cases with the da Vinci Si. Int J Colorectal Dis Germany 31:1639–1648 Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg United States 250:187–196 Piccoli M, Pecchini F, Esposito S, Sighinolfi C, Gozzo D, Trapani V et al (2020) First cases of combined full robotic partial nephrectomy and colorectal resections : results and new perspectives. Int J Med Robot 16(5):1–7 Vogt A, Schmid S, Heinimann K, Frick H, Herrmann C, Cerny T, et al (2017) Multiple primary tumours: challenges and approaches, a review. ESMO Open 2:e000172. http://esmoopen.bmj.com/content/2/2/e000172.abstract Ng SSM, Yiu RYC, Li JCM, Chan CK, Ng CF, Lau JYW (2006) Endolaparoscopic left hemicolectomy and synchronous laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for obstructive carcinoma of the descending colon and renal cell carcinoma. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 16:297–300 Ng SSM, Lee JFY, Yiu RYC, Li JCM, Leung KL (2007) Synchronous laparoscopic resection of colorectal and renal/adrenal neoplasms. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 17:283–286 Nishiyama N, Yamamoto S, Matsuoka N, Fujimoto H, Moriya Y (2009) Simultaneous laparoscopic descending colectomy and nephroureterectomy for descending colon carcinoma and left ureteral carcinoma: report of a case. Surg Today 39:728 Imagami T, Takayama S, Hattori T, Matsui R, Sakamoto M, Kani H et al (2018) Combined laparoscopic and robotic surgery for synchronous colorectal and genitourinary cancer: a case series. Int J Surg Case Rep 51:323–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-008-3918-0 Kamiyama H, Sakamoto K, China T, Aoki J, Niwa K, Ishiyama S et al (2016) Combined laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection and robotic-assisted prostatectomy for synchronous double cancer of the rectum and the prostate. Asian J Endosc Surg 9:142–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.12265 Lavery HJ, Patel SA, Chin E, Samadi DB (2011) Combined robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy and laparoscopic hemicolectomy. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 15:550–554 Siesto G, Ieda N, Rosati R, Vitobello D (2014) Robotic surgery for deep endometriosis: a paradigm shift. Int J Med Robot England 10:140–146 Dwyer RH, Scheidt MJ, Marshall JS, Tsoraides SS (2018) Safety and efficacy of synchronous robotic surgery for colorectal cancer with liver metastases. J Robot Surg 12:603–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0813-6 Konstantinidis IT, Raoof M, Zheleva V, Lafaro K, Lau C, Fong Y et al (2019) Multivisceral robotic liver surgery: feasible and safe. J Robot Surg. 14(3):503–507 Park M, Kim SC, Chung JS, Park SH, Park SS, Oh SJ et al (2016) Simultaneous robotic low anterior resection and prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma of rectum and prostate: initial case report. Springerplus 5:5–9 De’angelis N, Ingels A, De La Taille A, Brunetti F (2019) Simultaneous robotic total mesorectal excision and radical prostatectomy and enlarged iliac lymphadenectomy for synchronous adenocarcinomas—a video vignette. Color Dis 21:249–50 Graham J, Kirkbride P, Cann K, Hasler E, Prettyjohns M (2014) Prostate cancer: summary of updated nice guidance. BMJ 348:6–11. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f7524 Esposito S, Formisano G, Giuliani G, Misitano P, Krizzuk D, Salvischiani L et al (2017) Update on robotic surgery for rectal cancer treatment. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg 2:132–132 Bianchi PP, Luca F, Petz W, Valvo M, Cenciarelli S, Zuccaro M et al (2013) The role of the robotic technique in minimally invasive surgery in rectal cancer. Ecancermedicalscience 7:1–13 Halak M, Hazzan D, Kovacs Z, Shiloni E (2000) Synchronous colorectal and renal carcinomas: a noteworthy clinical entity. Report of five cases. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1314–1315 Sato S, Shinohara N, Suzuki S, Harabayashi T, Koyanagi T (2004) Multiple primary malignancies in Japanese patients with renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol 11:269–275 Beisland C, Talleraas O, Bakke A, Norstein J (2006) Multiple primary malignancies in patients with renal cell carcinoma: a national population-based cohort study. BJU Int England 97:698–702 Lim PC, Kang E, Park DH (2011) Robot-assisted total intracorporeal low anterior resection with primary anastomosis and radical dissection for treatment of stage IV endometriosis with bowel involvement: Morbidity and its outcome. J Robot Surg 5:273–278 Balla A, Quaresima S, Subiela JD, Shalaby M, Petrella G, Sileri P (2018) Outcomes after rectosigmoid resection for endometriosis: a systematic literature review. Int J Colorectal Dis 33:835–847 Ercoli A, Dasta M, Fagotti A, Fanfani F, Romano F, Baldazzi G et al (2012) Robotic treatment of colorectal endometriosis: technique, feasibility and short-term results. Hum Reprod 27:722–726 Graham A, Chen S, Skancke M, Moawad G, Obias V (2019) A review of deep infiltrative colorectal endometriosis treated robotically at a single institution. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 15:1–5 Morelli L, Perutelli A, Palmeri M, Guadagni S, Mariniello MD, Di Franco G et al (2016) Robot-assisted surgery for the radical treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis with colorectal involvement: short- and mid-term surgical and functional outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:643–652 Neme RM, Schraibman V, Okazaki S, Maccapani G, Chen WJ, Domit CD et al (2013) Deep infiltrating colorectal endometriosis treated with robotic-assisted rectosigmoidectomy. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 17:227–234 Jiang QG, Li TY, Liu DN, Tang C (2018) Total robotic surgery for pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with rectal cancer anterior resection a case report and literature review. Med. 97:e0540 Morelli L, Guadagni S, Di Franco G, Palmeri M, Caprili G, D’Isidoro C et al (2017) Use of the new da Vinci Xi® during robotic rectal resection for cancer: a pilot matched-case comparison with the da Vinci Si®. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg. 13(1):e1728 Protyniak B, Jorden J, Farmer R (2018) Multiquadrant robotic colorectal surgery: the da Vinci Xi vs Si comparison. J Robot Surg 12:67–74 Spinoglio G, Marano A, Formisano G (2015) Robotic Surgery Using Firefly System. In: Dip FD, Ishizawa T, Kokudo N, Rosenthal RJ (eds) Fluoresc Imaging Surg Concepts Appl. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15678-1_6 Dip FD, Ishizawa T, Kokudo N, Rosenthal RJ (2015) Fluorescence Imaging for Surgeons. Fluorescence Imaging Surgeons. Springer, Cham Shirata C, Kawaguchi Y, Kobayashi K, Kobayashi Y, Arita J, Akamatsu N et al (2018) Usefulness of indocyanine green-fluorescence imaging for real-time visualization of pancreas neuroendocrine tumor and cystic neoplasm. J Surg Oncol 118:1012–1020 Baik SH, Kim YT, Ko YT, Kang CM, Lee WJ, Kim NK et al (2008) Simultaneous robotic total mesorectal excision and total abdominal hysterectomy for rectal cancer and uterine myoma [1]. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:207–208 Yoo J, Jeong W, Oh CK, Lorenzo EIS, Lee YH, Rha KH (2010) Double primary tumor of the stomach and the prostate managed robotically simultaneously. J Robot Surg 4:53–55 Kim J, Kim SM, Seo JE, Choi MG, Lee JH, Sohn TS et al (2014) Concurrent robot-assisted distal gastrectomy and partial nephrectomy for synchronous early gastric cancer and renal cell carcinoma: An initial experience. J Gastric Cancer 14:211–214 Ong K-H, Huang S-H, Yen C-S, Tian Y-F, Sun D-P (2016) Simultaneous retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy and hepatectomy for synchronous renal-cell carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma in a cirrhotic patient. J Endourol Case Rep 2:215–217 Boni A, Cochetti G, Ascani S, Del Zingaro M, Quadrini F, Paladini A et al (2018) Robotic treatment of oligometastatic kidney tumor with synchronous pancreatic metastasis: case report and review of the literature. BMC Surg 18:1–10 Xu JM, Wei Y, Wang XY, Fan H, Chang WJ, Ren L et al (2015) Robot-assisted one-stage resection of rectal cancer with liver and lung metastases. World J Gastroenterol 21:2848–2853 Calin ML, Sadiq A, Arevalo G, Fuentes R, Flanders VL, Gupta N et al (2016) The first case report of robotic multivisceral resection for synchronous liver metastasis from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor: a case report and literature review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 26:816–824 Sunil S, Restrepo J, Azin A, Hirpara D, Cleary S, Cleghorn MC et al (2017) Robotic simultaneous resection of rectal cancer and liver metastases. Clin Case Rep 5:1913–1918 Funding None. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Ethics declarations Conflict of interest All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Ethics approval All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with ethical standards of Institutional and National research committee. Consent to participate Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants. Consent for publication All authors consent for publication of the study. Availability of data and material All relevant data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article. Additional information Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Piccoli, M., Esposito, S., Pecchini, F. et al. Full robotic multivisceral resections: the Modena experience and literature review. Updates Surg 73, 1177–1187 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00939-8 Received: Accepted: Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00939-8

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

MeSH descriptors

Laparoscopy Robotics Robotic Surgical Procedures Colectomy Female Humans Operative Time Postoperative Complications

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (3)

Cited by (1)

References (60)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-30T09:23:35.175841+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:24:55.077982+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK