Routine Clinical Examination Is Not Sufficient for Diagnosing and Locating Deeply Infiltrating Endometriosis

Chapron C, Charles Chapron, Dubuisson JB, Jean-Bernard Dubuisson, Valeiria Pansini, Pansini V, Vieira M, Marco Vieira, Fauconnier A, Arnaud Fauconnier, Habib Barakat, Barakat H, Bertrand Dousset, B. Dousset
The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists · 2002 · vol. 9(2) , pp. 115–119 · doi:10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60117-x · PMID:11960033 · W2140776183
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 131 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of routine clinical examinations for deeply infiltrating endometriosis, finding it insufficient for accurate diagnosis and localization.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Study objectiveTo determine whether routine clinical examination is sufficient for the diagnosis and establishing the location of deeply infiltrating endometriosis (DIE).DesignRetrospective analysis (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).SettingUniversity-affiliated hospital. Patients. One hundred sixty women with histologically proved deeply infiltrating endometriosis.Measurements and main resultsSpeculum examination allowed endometriotic lesions to be viewed in only 14.4% (23) of patients, and a classic, painful, spheric nodule was palpated in only 43.1% (69). Results of routine clinical examination varied significantly with location of DIE. Whereas a nodule was found in 80.0% (24) of patients with vaginal endometriosis, this rate dropped to only 35.3% (6) and 33.3% (34) in those with DIE of the digestive tract and uterosacral ligaments, respectively (p <0.0001).ConclusionHigh locations of DIE lesions at the level of uterosacral ligaments, bottom of the pouch of Douglas, and upper one-third of the posterior vaginal wall explain why results of routine clinical examination are so poor. The term "deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectovaginal septum" is generally incorrect in the true anatomic sense.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Physical Examination Adult Douglas' Pouch Douglas' Pouch Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Humans Laparoscopy Ligaments Ligaments Middle Aged Retrospective Studies Vaginal Diseases Vaginal Diseases

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (37)

Cited by (50)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-28T06:14:09.330459+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:13:07.520820+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-07-28T06:55:22.213180+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK