Laparoscopic Resection of Deep Pelvic Endometriosis with Rectosigmoid Involvement

Duepree HJ, Hans J. Duepree, Anthony J. Senagore, Senagore AJ, Conor P. Delaney, Delaney CP, Marcello PW, Peter W. Marcello, Karen M Brady, Brady KM, Karen Brady, Falcone T, Tommaso Falcone
Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2002 · vol. 195(6) , pp. 754–758 · doi:10.1016/s1072-7515(02)01341-8 · PMID:12495306 · W1976693224
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 141 in-corpus citations
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This study describes a planned laparoscopic approach to deep pelvic endometriosis with rectosigmoid involvement, including bowel resection when necessary, and reports significant symptom improvement and organ preservation.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-17 · read from full text ⓘ

This retrospective study evaluated the outcomes of planned complete laparoscopic excision for deep pelvic endometriosis involving the rectosigmoid in 51 patients with stage IV disease. The surgical approach included superficial excision, disc excision, or formal bowel resection, resulting in a median operating time of 187 minutes and a postoperative complication rate of 10.3%. Although the procedure was technically demanding and required access to colorectal expertise, 87% of patients reported clinically significant symptom improvement while preserving reproductive organs in most cases. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically the laparoscopic management of deep infiltrating lesions affecting the bowel.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adequate treatment of severe deep pelvic endometriosis requires complete excision of all implants, but formal bowel resection is not generally recommended. The purpose of this study was to describe our experience with planned complete laparoscopic management of deep pelvic endometriosis with bowel involvement. STUDY DESIGN: All patients presenting to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Department of Colorectal Surgery at our institution with stage IV endometriosis and bowel involvement from February 1998 to December 2001 were identified from a prospective database and were retrospectively analyzed. Data analysis included age, previous history of endometriosis, previous pregnancies, operative procedure, body mass index, operating room time, intra- and postoperative complications, length of stay, 30-day readmission, and pain relief. Laparoscopic excision of all visible disease was planned. RESULTS: The series consisted of 51 patients with median age of 34 years (range, 32 to 39 years), with history of earlier abdominal operation in 66.7%. Preoperative symptoms were present as dysmenorrhea (85.3%), dyspareunia (55.9%), rectal pain (41.2%), constipation (44.1%), rectal bleeding (14.7%), bloating (29.4%), and tenesmus (8.8%). Management of the bowel disease included superficial excision of serosal endometriosis implants (n = 26), bowel resection (n = 18), and disc excision (n = 5). Five patients required management of disease other than rectosigmoid involvement. Median operating room time was 187 minutes (range, 145 to 277 minutes), and the median length of stay was 2 days (range, 1 to 4 days). Thirty-three percent of excisions were outpatient procedures. Postoperative complications occurred in 10.3%: four cases (7.8%) were converted to formal laparotomy, and three patients (7.7%) were readmitted within 30 days. Only 7 of 47 patients with a uterus (14.9%) required abdominal hysterectomy or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Postoperatively, 87% of patients reported a clinically significant improvement of their symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Though technically demanding, complete radical laparoscopic excision of endometriotic implants can be accomplished with preservation of the reproductive organs and appropriate use of bowel resection in the majority of patients. The surgeon or gynecologist who plans to perform laparoscopic excision of deep pelvic endometriosis should have the ability or access to expertise for laparoscopic partial or segmental bowel resection or plan to convert to laparotomy when faced with this disease location.
Full text 2,791 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 3 sections · click to expand

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adequate treatment of severe deep pelvic endometriosis requires complete excision of all implants, but formal bowel resection is not generally recommended. The purpose of this study was to describe our experience with planned complete laparoscopic management of deep pelvic endometriosis with bowel involvement. STUDY DESIGN: All patients presenting to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Department of Colorectal Surgery at our institution with stage IV endometriosis and bowel involvement from February 1998 to December 2001 were identified from a prospective database and were retrospectively analyzed. Data analysis included age, previous history of endometriosis, previous pregnancies, operative procedure, body mass index, operating room time, intra- and postoperative complications, length of stay, 30-day readmission, and pain relief. Laparoscopic excision of all visible disease was planned.

Results

The series consisted of 51 patients with median age of 34 years (range, 32 to 39 years), with history of earlier abdominal operation in 66.7%. Preoperative symptoms were present as dysmenorrhea (85.3%), dyspareunia (55.9%), rectal pain (41.2%), constipation (44.1%), rectal bleeding (14.7%), bloating (29.4%), and tenesmus (8.8%). Management of the bowel disease included superficial excision of serosal endometriosis implants (n = 26), bowel resection (n = 18), and disc excision (n = 5). Five patients required management of disease other than rectosigmoid involvement. Median operating room time was 187 minutes (range, 145 to 277 minutes), and the median length of stay was 2 days (range, 1 to 4 days). Thirty-three percent of excisions were outpatient procedures. Postoperative complications occurred in 10.3%: four cases (7.8%) were converted to formal laparotomy, and three patients (7.7%) were readmitted within 30 days. Only 7 of 47 patients with a uterus (14.9%) required abdominal hysterectomy or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Postoperatively, 87% of patients reported a clinically significant improvement of their symptoms.

Conclusions

Though technically demanding, complete radical laparoscopic excision of endometriotic implants can be accomplished with preservation of the reproductive organs and appropriate use of bowel resection in the majority of patients. The surgeon or gynecologist who plans to perform laparoscopic excision of deep pelvic endometriosis should have the ability or access to expertise for laparoscopic partial or segmental bowel resection or plan to convert to laparotomy when faced with this disease location.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisdysmenorrheadyspareunia

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Laparoscopy Rectal Diseases Sigmoid Diseases Adult Endometriosis Female Humans Rectal Diseases Retrospective Studies Sigmoid Diseases Treatment Outcome

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (27)

Cited by (50)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-25T06:10:03.373225+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:13:01.552487+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK