Alternative treatments of adenomyosis - an update in procedural management and clinical outcomes

Alison M Zeccola, Alison Zeccola, Zeccola AM, Allen SE, Sarah E. Allen
Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology · 2024 · vol. 36(4) , pp. 287–295 · doi:10.1097/gco.0000000000000972 · PMID:38837727 · W4399370821
Review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 3 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-09 ⓘ

This review updates evidence for uterine-sparing interventions like UAE, RFA, HIFU, PMWA, and adenomyomectomy to treat adenomyosis, reporting symptom improvement and reduced uterine volume.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Adenomyosis is a common cause of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), dysmenorrhea, and pelvic pain. Definitive diagnosis and treatment have historically been by uterine histopathology at time of hysterectomy; however, advances in imaging have supported earlier diagnosis and subsequent conservative treatment. This review aims to update the evidence supporting the uterine-sparing, procedural management options with a focus on clinical outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Uterine artery embolization (UAE), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), percutaneous microwave ablation (PMWA), and adenomyomectomy are minimally invasive interventions proven to be effective in reducing AUB and dysmenorrhea due to adenomyosis. Symptom improvement is associated with a decrease in uterine volume. Studies support the use of alternative treatment options given the overall low rates of symptom recurrence and reintervention. Combination therapy may be more effective than monotherapy. SUMMARY: This review provides the current evidence for use of alternative treatment options for adenomyosis. Access to ablative therapies in the USA is limited and primarily off label, given lack of FDA approval. High-quality prospective and randomized controlled trials are needed in order to further delineate treatment comparisons, efficacy, safety, and ideal patient selection for these treatments. More data are needed to assess safety and utility in those desiring future fertility.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

dysmenorrheachronic_pelvic_painadenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (73)

Cited by (5)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-18T09:30:06.152893+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-18T06:13:19.405360+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK