Comparison between microwave ablation and radiofrequency ablation for treating symptomatic uterine adenomyosis

article OA: gold CC0 ⤵ 20 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-06

Both microwave ablation and radiofrequency ablation effectively treated symptomatic uterine adenomyosis, with microwave ablation showing a shorter mean ablation time.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The safety and effectiveness of PMWA and USgRFA in the treatment of uterine adenomyosis were similar; however, the mean ablation time of PMWA was shorter than that of USgRFA.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

adenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Adenomyosis Catheter Ablation High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation Uterine Neoplasms Adenomyosis Adult Catheter Ablation Female High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation Humans Middle Aged Prospective Studies Uterine Neoplasms

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (40)

Cited by (21)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-18T06:10:57.818014+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:22:17.025735+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK