Significance of Adenomyosis on Tumor Progression and Survival Outcome of Endometrial Cancer

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 27 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-07

Adenomyosis in endometrial cancer patients was associated with lower tumor grade, earlier stage, and better disease-free and overall survival outcomes.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

This retrospective study evaluated stage I–IV endometrial cancer patients undergoing hysterectomy-based surgical staging (n=571) and women with endometrial hyperplasia undergoing hysterectomy (n=213), comparing clinicopathologic factors and survival outcomes by the presence or absence of adenomyosis. Among endometrial cancer cases, adenomyosis was present in 47.5% and was associated with less aggressive features, including lower tumor grade, earlier stage, and lower likelihood of deep myometrial and cervical invasion; in survival analyses, endometrial cancer coexisting with adenomyosis showed better disease-free and overall survival after hysterectomy, and adenomyosis remained an independent prognostic factor for decreased recurrence risk in multivariate models. A key limitation is the retrospective design and the observation-level nature of associations, which cannot establish causality. Relevance to endometriosis and/or adenomyosis: the paper is centrally about adenomyosis in relation to endometrial cancer progression and survival, directly addressing uterine adenomyosis as a modifier of tumor behavior.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BackgroundTo examine the effects of adenomyosis on tumor progression and survival outcome of endometrial cancer patients.MethodsThis is a retrospective study examining stage I-IV endometrial cancer patients who underwent hysterectomy-based surgical staging (n = 571), and endometrial hyperplasia patients who underwent hysterectomy (n = 213). Clinical demographics, histopathological factors, and survival outcomes were analyzed based on the presence or absence of adenomyosis.ResultsAmong the endometrial cancer cohort, adenomyosis was observed in 47.5 % of cases and was significantly associated with lower grade (grade 1-2 tumors, 81.2 vs. 73.3 %; p = 0.028), earlier stage (stage I disease, 74.8 vs. 64.3 %; p = 0.023), and lower likelihood of deep myometrial invasion (19.2 vs. 28.2 %; p = 0.039) and cervical invasion (13.7 vs. 21.2 %; p = 0.024) than those without adenomyosis. In survival analysis, endometrial cancer coexisting with adenomyosis was associated with a significantly better disease-free survival (5-year rate, 89.2 vs. 78.2 %; p < 0.001) and overall survival (91.8 vs. 83.9 %; p = 0.004) after hysterectomy. In multivariate analysis, controlling for other significant variables in univariate analysis, presence of adenomyosis remained an independent prognostic factor associated with decreased risk of disease recurrence after surgery (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.30-0.92; p = 0.023). Endometrial hyperplasia had a significantly increased incidence of adenomyosis when compared with type I endometrial cancer (grade 1-2 endometrioid adenocarcinoma, n = 411) on multivariate analysis (62.9 vs. 48.9 %; HR 1.88; 95 % CI 1.32-2.69; p < 0.001).ConclusionsAdenomyosis appears to be associated with less aggressive tumor behavior of endometrial cancer, suggesting that it may have inhibitory effects on the progression of this disease.
Full text 10,696 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background To examine the effects of adenomyosis on tumor progression and survival outcome of endometrial cancer patients.

Methods

This is a retrospective study examining stage I–IV endometrial cancer patients who underwent hysterectomy-based surgical staging (n = 571), and endometrial hyperplasia patients who underwent hysterectomy (n = 213). Clinical demographics, histopathological factors, and survival outcomes were analyzed based on the presence or absence of adenomyosis.

Results

Among the endometrial cancer cohort, adenomyosis was observed in 47.5 % of cases and was significantly associated with lower grade (grade 1–2 tumors, 81.2 vs. 73.3 %; p = 0.028), earlier stage (stage I disease, 74.8 vs. 64.3 %; p = 0.023), and lower likelihood of deep myometrial invasion (19.2 vs. 28.2 %; p = 0.039) and cervical invasion (13.7 vs. 21.2 %; p = 0.024) than those without adenomyosis. In survival analysis, endometrial cancer coexisting with adenomyosis was associated with a significantly better disease-free survival (5-year rate, 89.2 vs. 78.2 %; p < 0.001) and overall survival (91.8 vs. 83.9 %; p = 0.004) after hysterectomy. In multivariate analysis, controlling for other significant variables in univariate analysis, presence of adenomyosis remained an independent prognostic factor associated with decreased risk of disease recurrence after surgery (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.30–0.92; p = 0.023). Endometrial hyperplasia had a significantly increased incidence of adenomyosis when compared with type I endometrial cancer (grade 1–2 endometrioid adenocarcinoma, n = 411) on multivariate analysis (62.9 vs. 48.9 %; HR 1.88; 95 % CI 1.32–2.69; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Adenomyosis appears to be associated with less aggressive tumor behavior of endometrial cancer, suggesting that it may have inhibitory effects on the progression of this disease. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:11-30. Wright JD, Barrena Medel NI, Sehouli J, Fujiwara K, Herzog TJ. Contemporary management of endometrial cancer. Lancet. 2012;379:1352–60. Garcia L, Isaacson K. Adenomyosis: review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18:428–37. Kairi-Vassilatou E, Kontogianni K, Salamalekis M, Sykiotis K, Kondi-Pafitis A. A clinicopathological study of the relationship between adenomyosis and other hormone-dependent uterine lesions. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2004;25:222–4. Winkelman J, Robinson R. Adenocarcinoma of endometrium involving adenomyosis. Report of an unusual case and review of the literature. Cancer. 1966;19:901–8. Hernandez E, Woodruff JD. Endometrial adenocarcinoma arising in adenomyosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;138:827–32. Woodruff JD, Erozan YS, Genadry R. Adenocarcinoma arising in adenomyosis detected by atypical cytology. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;67:145–8. Kuwashima Y, Uehara T, Kishi K, et al. Intramural adenocarcinoma of the uterus, arisen from adenomyosis uteri, showing unique histologic appearances. Report of two cases. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1994;15:418–23. Hayata T, Tanaka Y, Miyakawa I. Endometrial cancer associated with adenomyosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1994;44:76–7. Takai N, Akizuki S, Nasu K, Etoh Y, Miyakawa I. Endometrioid adenocarcinoma arising from adenomyosis. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1999;48:141–4. Sasaki T, Sugiyama T, Nanjo H, et al. Endometrioid adenocarcinoma arising from adenomyosis: report and immunohistochemical analysis of an unusual case. Pathol Int. 2001;51:308–13. Ichikawa Y, Takano K, Higa S, et al. Endometrial carcinoma coexisting with pregnancy, presumed to derive from adenomyosis: a case report. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2001;11:488–90. Koshiyama M, Suzuki A, Ozawa M, et al. Adenocarcinomas arising from uterine adenomyosis: a report of four cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2002;21:239–45. Couto D, Mota F, Silva T, de Oliveira C. Adenocarcinoma arising in adenomyosis: report of an unusual case. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83:406–8. Takeuchi K, Yamanaka Y, Hamana S, Ohara N, Maruo T. Invasive adenocarcinoma arising from uterine adenomyosis involving the rectosigmoid colon. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2004;14:1004–6. Hsu MI, Chou SY, Lin SE, Liang SJ, Chiu HC, Hsu CS. Very early stage adenocarcinoma arising from adenomyosis in the uterus. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;45:346–9. Izadi-Mood N, Samadi N, Sarmadi S, Eftekhar Z. Papillary serous carcinoma arising from adenomyosis presenting as intramural leiomyoma. Arch Iran Med. 2007;10:258–60. Ismiil ND, Rasty G, Ghorab Z, et al. Adenomyosis is associated with myometrial invasion by FIGO 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2007;26:278–83. Puppa G, Shozu M, Perin T, et al. Small primary adenocarcinoma in adenomyosis with nodal metastasis: a case report. BMC Cancer. 2007;7:103. Ismiil N, Rasty G, Ghorab Z, et al. Adenomyosis involved by endometrial adenocarcinoma is a significant risk factor for deep myometrial invasion. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2007;11:252–7. Ohta Y, Hamatani S, Suzuki T, et al. Clear cell adenocarcinoma arising from a giant cystic adenomyosis: a case report with immunohistochemical analysis of laminin-5 gamma2 chain and p53 overexpression. Pathol Res Pract. 2008;204:677–82. Motohara K, Tashiro H, Ohtake H, Saito F, Ohba T, Katabuchi H. Endometrioid adenocarcinoma arising in adenomyosis: elucidation by periodic magnetic resonance imaging evaluations. Int J Clin Oncol. 2008;13:266–70. Hirabayashi K, Yasuda M, Kajiwara H, et al. Clear cell adenocarcinoma arising from adenomyosis. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2009;28:262–6. Kazandi M, Zeybek B, Terek MC, Zekioglu O, Ozdemir N, Oztekin K. Grade 2 endometrioid adenocarcinoma arising from adenomyosis of the uterus: report of a case. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2010;31:719–21. Abushahin N, Zhang T, Chiang S, Zhang X, Hatch K, Zheng W. Serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma arising in adenomyosis: a report of 5 cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2011;30:271–81. Kucera E, Hejda V, Dankovcik R, Valha P, Dudas M, Feyereisl J. Malignant changes in adenomyosis in patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2011;32:182–4. Boes AS, Tousseyn T, Vandenput I, et al. Pitfall in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer: case report of an endometrioid adenocarcinoma arising from uterine adenomyosis. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2011;32:431–4. Quick CM, May T, Horowitz NS, Nucci MR. Low-grade, low-stage endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma: a clinicopathologic analysis of 324 cases focusing on frequency and pattern of myoinvasion. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2012;31:337–43. Hanley KZ, Dustin SM, Stoler MH, Atkins KA. The significance of tumor involved adenomyosis in otherwise low-stage endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2010;29:445–51. Hall JB, Young RH, Nelson JH Jr. The prognostic significance of adenomyosis in endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1984;17:32–40. Jacques SM, Lawrence WD. Endometrial adenocarcinoma with variable-level myometrial involvement limited to adenomyosis: a clinicopathologic study of 23 cases. Gynecol Oncol. 1990;37:401–7. Mittal KR, Barwick KW. Endometrial adenocarcinoma involving adenomyosis without true myometrial invasion is characterized by frequent preceding estrogen therapy, low histologic grades, and excellent prognosis. Gynecol Oncol. 1993;49:197–201. Koshiyama M, Okamoto T, Ueta M. The relationship between endometrial carcinoma and coexistent adenomyosis uteri, endometriosis externa and myoma uteri. Cancer Detect Prev. 2004;28:94–8. Musa F, Frey MK, Im HB, Chekmareva M, Ellenson LH, Holcomb K. Does the presence of adenomyosis and lymphovascular space invasion affect lymph node status in patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207:417.e1-6. Gun I, Oner O, Bodur S, Ozdamar O, Atay V. Is adenomyosis associated with the risk of endometrial cancer? Med Glas (Zenica). 2012;9:268–72. Sotnikova N, Antsiferova I, Malyshkina A. Cytokine network of eutopic and ectopic endometrium in women with adenomyosis. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2002;47:251–5. Wang F, Li H, Yang Z, Du X, Cui M, Wen Z. Expression of interleukin-10 in patients with adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:1681–5. Ikeda H, Old LJ, Schreiber RD. The roles of IFN gamma in protection against tumor development and cancer immunoediting. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2002;13:95–109. Ferrantini M, Capone I, Belardelli F. Interferon-alpha and cancer: mechanisms of action and new perspectives of clinical use. Biochimie. 2007;89:884–93. van Horssen R, Ten Hagen TL, Eggermont AM. TNF-alpha in cancer treatment: molecular insights, antitumor effects, and clinical utility. Oncologist. 2006;11:397–408. Tagashira Y, Taniguchi F, Harada T, Ikeda A, Watanabe A, Terakawa N. Interleukin-10 attenuates TNF-alpha-induced interleukin-6 production in endometriotic stromal cells. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2185–92. Zitvogel L, Kepp O, Galluzzi L, Kroemer G. Inflammasomes in carcinogenesis and anticancer immune responses. Nat Immunol. 2012;13:343–51. Palena C, Hamilton DH, Fernando RI. Influence of IL-8 on the epithelial-mesenchymal transition and the tumor microenvironment. Future Oncol. 2012;8:713–22. Yang JH, Wu MY, Chen CD, Chen MJ, Yang YS, Ho HN. Altered apoptosis and proliferation in endometrial stromal cells of women with adenomyosis. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:945–52. Mehasseb MK, Bell SC, Brown L, Pringle JH, Habiba M. Phenotypic characterisation of the inner and outer myometrium in normal and adenomyotic uteri. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2011;71:217–24. Benagiano G, Habiba M, Brosens I. The pathophysiology of uterine adenomyosis: an update. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:572–9. Vercellini P, Vigano P, Somigliana E, Daguati R, Abbiati A, Fedele L. Adenomyosis: epidemiological factors. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20:465–77. Koike N, Tsunemi T, Uekuri C, et al. Pathogenesis and malignant transformation of adenomyosis (review). Oncol Rep. 2013;29:861–7. Acknowledgment No funding support was provided for this study. Disclosure Koji Matsuo, Sigita S. Cahoon, Marc Gualtieri, Christopher A. Scannell, Carrie E. Jung, Tadao Takano, Richard J. Paulson, Laila I. Muderspach, and Lynda D. Roman declare that there are no conflicts of interest for this study. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Matsuo, K., Cahoon, S.S., Gualtieri, M. et al. Significance of Adenomyosis on Tumor Progression and Survival Outcome of Endometrial Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 21, 4246–4255 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3880-6 Received: Published: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3880-6

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

adenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Adenomyosis Endometrial Neoplasms Endometrial Neoplasms Myometrium Adenocarcinoma Adenocarcinoma Adenocarcinoma Adenocarcinoma Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous Disease Progression Endometrial Neoplasms

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (49)

Cited by (28)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-27T06:15:28.040536+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:18:22.440000+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK