Adenomyosis is not an independent prognostic factor in endometrioid-type endometrial cancer

article OA: closed public-domain-us
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-13

This study found that adenomyosis is not an independent prognostic factor for disease-free or overall survival in patients with endometrioid-type endometrial cancer.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-13 · read from full text

This retrospective cohort study evaluated whether coexisting adenomyosis affects clinicopathologic features and survival in 527 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed endometrioid-type endometrial cancer treated with primary surgery at a tertiary gynecologic oncology center (2010–2025). Patients were grouped by adenomyosis presence in hysterectomy specimens, with group comparisons of tumor characteristics and Kaplan–Meier/Cox analyses for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), adjusting for established prognostic factors. Adenomyosis (29.2%) did not associate with differences in age, grade, FIGO stage, myometrial invasion, LVSI, lymph node metastasis, or adjuvant treatment, and it was not an independent predictor of DFS or OS; instead, LVSI predicted worse DFS and older age, grade 3 histology, advanced stage, and positive peritoneal cytology predicted worse OS. The paper’s limitation is that it is retrospective and conducted at a single tertiary center. This paper is centrally about adenomyosis — it examines whether coexisting adenomyosis independently influences prognostic outcomes in endometrioid-type endometrial cancer.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of adenomyosis in endometrial cancer (EC) remains controversial. Although several studies have suggested an association between adenomyosis and favorable tumor characteristics or improved survival outcomes, it remains unclear whether this relationship persists after adjustment for established clinicopathologic prognostic factors. AIM: To investigate the impact of coexisting adenomyosis on clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes in patients with endometrioid-type endometrial cancer. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 527 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed endometrioid-type endometrial cancer who underwent primary surgical treatment between January 2010 and May 2025 at a tertiary gynecologic oncology center. Patients were categorized according to the presence or absence of adenomyosis identified in hysterectomy specimens. Clinicopathologic characteristics were compared between groups. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. RESULTS: Adenomyosis was identified in 154 patients (29.2%). No significant differences were observed between patients with and without adenomyosis regarding age, tumor grade, FIGO stage, myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), lymph node metastasis, or adjuvant treatment (all p > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated no significant differences in either DFS or OS according to adenomyosis status (log-rank p = 0.626 and p = 0.697, respectively). In multivariable analysis, LVSI remained the only independent predictor of poorer DFS (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.02-4.53, p = 0.044), whereas older age (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.06-1.12, p < 0.001), grade 3 histology (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.26-3.54, p = 0.005), advanced FIGO stage (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.18-2.93, p = 0.003), and positive peritoneal cytology (HR 4.47, 95% CI 1.20-16.64, p = 0.026) were independently associated with poorer OS. Adenomyosis was not identified as an independent prognostic factor for either DFS or OS. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of patients with endometrioid-type endometrial cancer, coexisting adenomyosis was not independently associated with distinct clinicopathologic features, disease-free survival, or overall survival. Established clinicopathologic factors remained the primary determinants of oncologic outcomes.
Full text 8,445 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background The prognostic significance of adenomyosis in endometrial cancer (EC) remains controversial. Although several studies have suggested an association between adenomyosis and favorable tumor characteristics or improved survival outcomes, it remains unclear whether this relationship persists after adjustment for established clinicopathologic prognostic factors. Aim To investigate the impact of coexisting adenomyosis on clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes in patients with endometrioid-type endometrial cancer.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included 527 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed endometrioid-type endometrial cancer who underwent primary surgical treatment between January 2010 and May 2025 at a tertiary gynecologic oncology center. Patients were categorized according to the presence or absence of adenomyosis identified in hysterectomy specimens. Clinicopathologic characteristics were compared between groups. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses.

Results

Adenomyosis was identified in 154 patients (29.2%). No significant differences were observed between patients with and without adenomyosis regarding age, tumor grade, FIGO stage, myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), lymph node metastasis, or adjuvant treatment (all p > 0.05). Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated no significant differences in either DFS or OS according to adenomyosis status (log-rank p = 0.626 and p = 0.697, respectively). In multivariable analysis, LVSI remained the only independent predictor of poorer DFS (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.02–4.53, p = 0.044), whereas older age (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.06–1.12, p < 0.001), grade 3 histology (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.26–3.54, p = 0.005), advanced FIGO stage (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.18–2.93, p = 0.003), and positive peritoneal cytology (HR 4.47, 95% CI 1.20–16.64, p = 0.026) were independently associated with poorer OS. Adenomyosis was not identified as an independent prognostic factor for either DFS or OS.

Conclusion

In this cohort of patients with endometrioid-type endometrial cancer, coexisting adenomyosis was not independently associated with distinct clinicopathologic features, disease-free survival, or overall survival. Established clinicopathologic factors remained the primary determinants of oncologic outcomes. Similar content being viewed by others Data availability In view of the confidentiality and privacy of the participants, the datasets and supporting materials are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Raimondo D, Raffone A, Travaglino A et al (2022) Impact of adenomyosis on the prognosis of patients with endometrial cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 157(2):265–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13818 Matsuo K, Cahoon SS, Gualtieri M et al (2014) Significance of adenomyosis on tumor progression and survival outcome of endometrial cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 21(13):4246–4255. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3880-6 La Torre F, Hurni Y, Farsi E et al (2025) Adenomyosis associated with endometrial cancer: Possible correlation with pathological, immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics. Gynecol Oncol 195:45–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.02.017 Raffone A, Raimondo D, Maletta M et al (2023) Endometrial cancer arising in adenomyosis (EC-AIA): a systematic review. Cancers (Basel) 15(4):1142. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041142 Shiwali V, Tang Y, Xue M et al (2025) Adenomyosis and endometrial cancer: Determining its role as a biological contributor or incidental coexistence. BMC Cancer 25(1):984. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-14389-1 Ulger G, Gokulu SG, Akay K et al (2025) Does adenomyosis influence tumor characteristics and survival in endometrioid-type endometrial cancer? BMC Womens Health 25(1):237. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03786-0 Erkilinc S, Taylan E, Gulseren V et al (2018) The effect of adenomyosis on myometrial invasion and overall survival in endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 28(1):145–151. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000001137 Matot R, Englander D, Sela Y et al (2026) Exploring the influence of adenomyosis on endometrial cancer. Maturitas 207:108872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2026.108872 Musa F, Frey MK, Im HB et al (2012) Does the presence of adenomyosis and lymphovascular space invasion affect lymph node status in patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium? Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(5):417.e1-417.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.051 Hermens M, van Altena AM, van der Aa M et al (2022) Endometrial cancer prognosis in women with endometriosis and adenomyosis: a retrospective nationwide cohort study of 40,840 women. Int J Cancer 150(9):1439–1446. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33907 Ozgen L, Yalcin Y, Abay M et al (2025) Impact of uterine adenomyosis on survival outcome of patients with non-endometrioid endometrial cancer. BMC Cancer 25(1):1574. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-14815-4 Celik E, Goksever Celik H, Sozen H et al (2022) The effect of adenomyosis on endometrial cancer: a university hospital-based cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol 42(1):158–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2021.1980508 Hertlein L, Rath J, Zeder-Goss C et al (2017) Coexistence of adenomyosis uteri and endometrial cancer is associated with an improved prognosis compared with endometrial cancer only. Oncol Lett 14(3):3302–3308. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.6592 Simsek E, Yildiz S, Karakas S et al (2023) Effect of adenomyosis on prognosis of patients with endometrial cancer. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 69(7):e20221720. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20221720 Yilmaz A, Cokmez H, Gulbahar A (2022) Effect of coexisting adenomyosis on patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma: determination of intraoperative risk factors for tumor metastasis and estimation of prognosis. J Cancer Res Ther 18(3):599–602. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_1277_20 Wang DG, Ji LM, Jia CL et al (2023) Effect of coexisting adenomyosis on tumour characteristics and prognosis of endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 62(5):640–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2023.07.004 Buyuksahin LG, Ibanoglu MC, Ozturk AC et al (2024) Does coexistence of endometrial cancer and adenomyosis affect survival outcomes? A retrospective cohort study. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 45(2):118–126. https://doi.org/10.22514/ejgo.2023.112 Funding None. Author information Authors and Affiliations Contributions Yakup Yalcin: Conceptualization; methodology, data collection, writing original draft, review & editing. Kemal Ozerkan: Conceptualization; methodology, data collection. All authors meet the criteria for authorship, have approved the final article and that all those entitled to authorship are listed as authors. Corresponding author Ethics declarations Ethical compliance All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the Bursa Uludağ University Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Protocol No. 2026/157/6 − 5). Due to the retrospective nature of the study, the ethics committee exempted the requirement for informed consent. Conflict of interest The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, or publication of this article. Additional information Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. About this article Cite this article Yalcin, Y., Ozerkan, K. Adenomyosis is not an independent prognostic factor in endometrioid-type endometrial cancer. Ir J Med Sci (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-026-04535-4 Received: Accepted: Published: Version of record: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-026-04535-4

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (17)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-19T06:08:28.815611+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-08-19T06:02:05.074954+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-08-19T06:03:48.687468+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-19T06:23:00.919175+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine