Presacral neurectomy for chronic pelvic pain.

Obstetrics and gynecology · 1986 · vol. 68(4) , pp. 517–21 · PMID:3748502 · W2433285666
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 39 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-12 ⓘ

Presacral neurectomy for chronic pelvic pain achieved 63-77% success rates for dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and other pelvic pains, with recurrence in 18% of lateral pelvic pain cases and 4% complications.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Over an eight-year period, 50 presacral neurectomies were performed at Madigan Army Medical Center for chronic pelvic pain failing response to medical management. Each hospital record was reviewed and 45 patients answered a questionnaire grading the severity of their pain from 0 to 10 for dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and other pelvic pain before and after surgery. The results showed success rates of 73% in relieving dysmenorrhea, 77% in relieving dyspareunia, and 63% in relieving other pelvic pains. The addition of a bilateral uterosacral ligament resection to the presacral neurectomy did not increase the success rate. There was an 18% lateral pelvic pain recurrence rate, and no recurrence of dysmenorrhea. Complications occurred in 4%.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

dysmenorrheaendometriosischronic_pelvic_paindyspareunia

MeSH descriptors

Dysmenorrhea Lumbosacral Plexus Pain Pelvis Adolescent Adult Dysmenorrhea Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Humans Labor, Obstetric Ligaments Ligaments Lumbosacral Plexus Pain Pregnancy Recurrence Sacrum Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

Cited by (37)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-27T09:11:36.575535+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:09:35.489789+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK