The Role of Uterosacral Ligament Resection in Conservative Operations for Recurrent Endometriosis

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 13 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-07

This study found that uterosacral ligament resection combined with conservative surgery for recurrent endometriosis relieved dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and dyschezia in most patients, regardless of visible ligament involvement.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Fifteen patients with a history of endometriosis and recurrent pelvic pain underwent conservative resection at laparotomy. Microsurgical resection of endometriotic lesions and restoration of pelvic anatomy were performed. Presacral neurectomy was carried out in 12 of 15 (80%) patients complaining of significant midline pelvic dysmenorrhea. AH patients had retroperitoneal dissections and bilateral uterosacral ligament resections regardless of whether or not there was clinical suspicion of uterosacral ligament involvement. Dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and dyschezia were relieved in 12 of 15 (80%), 7 of 12 (58%), and 8 of 11 (77%) patients, respectively. Eight patients (54%) had histological involvement of the uterosacral ligaments. Of this subgroup of patients, all had relief of dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and dyschezia postoperatively. Gross appearance was not always reliable in determining uterosacral ligament involvement. We believe that bilateral uterosacral ligament resection may benefit patients with endometriosis by improving symptoms of deeply infiltrating lesions (dyspareunia, dyschezia) in addition to the known effects of conservative resection and presacral neurectomy in alleviating dysmenorrhea. Further study of this adjunctive procedure in a prospective fashion appears warranted. (J GYNECOL SURG 10:57, 1994)

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisdysmenorrheadyspareunia

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (3)

Cited by (13)

Source provenance

crossref
last seen: 2026-05-16T01:00:14.759568+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-25T06:41:39.333708+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK