Surgical Management of Pelvic Pain

In: Chronic Pelvic Pain · 1998 · pp. 153–166 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1752-7_10 · W941871045
book-chapter OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 7 in-corpus citations
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07+body, 2026-07-07

Surgical management of chronic pelvic pain requires careful patient assessment and procedure selection, as diagnosis can be difficult and surgical pathology does not always correlate with long-term pain relief.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09 · read from full text

This review discusses surgical management of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) when medical therapy has failed and when a surgically correctable pain source is suspected, emphasizing high-level preoperative assessment, procedure selection, and counseling because chronic nonmalignant pain can be hard to diagnose. It notes that while laparoscopy often identifies pathology (citing data where 61% of CPP patients vs 28% of controls had pathology), fewer than half report long-term pain relief, suggesting that laparoscopic pathology may be a surrogate endpoint and that true surgical success should be measured by function rather than findings alone. A key limitation is that the long-term impact of laparoscopy on outcome variables requires further study. Relevance to endometriosis: the paper cites prior work on laparoscopic appearances of peritoneal endometriosis and includes endometriosis-related discussions (e.g., presacral neurectomy and laser laparoscopy for endometriosis), though its overall focus is broad surgical management of chronic pelvic pain rather than endometriosis specifically.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 10,008 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 3 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Surgical management of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is ideally performed when medical management has failed and a surgically correctable pain source has been identified. In reality, the cause of chronic, nonmalignant pain is often difficult to diagnose, particularly when no ongoing tissue damage or noxious stimulus is evident. In addition to performing a technically correct surgery, therefore, appropriate preoperative patient assessment, procedure selection, and patient counseling are critical to the overall success of the surgery. Before resorting to diagnostic or therapeutic surgery, a meticulous history and physical examination should be performed to identify nonsurgical and nongynecological causes of pain. Although laparoscopy is frequently used to evaluate patients with CPP, its effect on long-term outcome variables needs further study. In a review by Howard, 61% to patients with CPP had pathology at laparoscopy opposed to 28% in the control group.1 Less than 50% of these women, however, experienced long-term pain relief. The discovery of pathology may therefore be a surrogate endpoint, whereas true surgical success should be measured by a patient’ s ability to function. Preview Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Howard FM. The role of laparoscopy in chronic pelvic pain: promise and pitfalls. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1993; 48: 357–87. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Quality assessment and improvement in obstetrics and gynecology. Washington, DC, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1994. Travell JG, Simons DG. Myofascial pain and dysfunction: the trigger point manual. Baltimore, William & Wilkins, 1983. Slocumb JC. Neurological factors in chronic pelvic pain: trigger points and the abdominal pelvic pain syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 149: 536–43. Kaminski PF, Soroski JI, Mandell MJ, et al. Clomiphene citrate stimulation as an adjunct in locating ovarian tissue in ovarian remnant syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 67: 924–26. Scott RT, Beatse SN, Illions EH, et al. Use of the GnRH agonist stimulation test in the diagnosis of ovarian remnant syndrome. JReprodMed 1995; 40: 143–46. Lafferty HW, Angioli R, Rudolph J, et al. Ovarian remnant syndrome: experience at Jackson Memorial Hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174: 641–45. Siddall-Allum J, Rae T, Rogers V, et al. Chronic pelvic pain caused by residual ovaries and ovarian remnants. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 979–85. Grogen RH. Residual ovaries. Obstet Gynecol 1958; 12: 329–32. Grogen RH. Re-appraisal of residual ovaries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1967; 97: 124–29. Christ JE, Lotze EC. The residual ovary syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 1975; 46: 551–56. Symmonds RE, Pettit PDM. Ovarian remnant syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 1979; 54: 174–77. Taylor HC. Vascular congestion and hyperemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1949; 57: 211–30. Taylor HC. Vascular congestion and hyperemia. II. The clinical aspect of congestion fibrosis syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1949; 57: 637–53. Taylor HC. Vascular congestion and hyperemia. III. Etiology and therapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1949; 57: 654–68. Beard RW, Pearse S, Highman JH, et al. Diagnosis of pelvic varicosities in women with chronic pelvic pain. Lancet 1984; 8409: 946–49. Beard RW, Belsey EM, Lieberman MB, et al. Pelvic pain in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1977; 128: 566–70. Stones RW, Rae T, Rogers V, Fry R, et al. Pelvic congestion in women: evaluation with transvaginal ultrasound and observations of venous pharmacology. Br J Radiol 1990; 63: 710–11. Stones RW, Thomas DC, Beard RW. Suprasensitivity to calcitonin gene-related peptide but not vasoactive intestinal peptide in women with chronic pelvic pain. Clin Autonomic Res 1992; 2: 343–48. Stones RW, Loesch A, Beard RW, et al. Substance P: endothelial localization and pharmacology in the human ovarian vein. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 273–78. Reginald PW, Beard RW, Kooner JS, et al. Intravenous dihydroergotamine to relieve pelvic congestion with pain in young women. Lancet 1987; 8555: 351–53. Beard RW, Kennedy RG, Ganger KF, et al. Bilateral oophorectomy and hysterectomy in treatment of intractable pelvic pain associated with pelvic congestion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98: 988–92. Peterson HB, Hulka JF, Phillips JM. American Association of Gynecologic laparoscopists’ 1988 membership survey on operative laparoscopists. J Reprod Med. 1990; 35: 587–89. Kresch AJ, Seifer DB, Sachs LB, et al. Laparoscopy in 100 women with chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 64: 672–74. Stout AL, Steege JF. Relationship of laparoscopic findings to self-report of pelvic pain. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 164: 73–79. Martin DC, Hubert GD, Vander Zwaag R, et al. Laparoscopic appearances of peritoneal endometriosis. Fertil Steril 1989; 51: 63–67. Baker PN, Symonds EM. The resolution of chronic pelvic pain after normal laparoscopic findings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166: 835–36. Jaboulay M. Le traitement de la neralgie pelvienne par la paralysie du sympathique sacre. Lyon Med 1899; 90: 102–108. Ruggi C. La simpatectomia addominale utero-ovarica come mezzo di cura di alcune lesioi interne degli organi genitali delia donna. Bologna, Zanichelli, 1899. Garcia CR, David SS. Pelvic endometriosis: infertility and pelvic pain. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1977; 129: 740–47. Lee RB, Stone K, Magelssen D, et al. Presacral neurectomy for chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68: 517–21. Perry CP, Perez J. The role for laparoscopic presacral neurectomy. J Gynecol Surg 1993; 9: 165–68. Puolakka J, Kauppila A, Ronnberg L. Results in the operative treatment of pelvic endometriosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1980; 59: 429–31. Polan ML, DeCherney A. Presacral neurectomy for pelvic pain in infertility. Fertil Steril 1980; 34: 557–60. Biggerstaff ED, Foster SN. Laparoscopic presacral neurectomy for treatment of midline pelvic pain. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1994; 2: 31–35. Tjaden B, Schlaff WS, Kimball A, et al. The efficacy of presacral neurectomy for the relief of midline dysmenorrhea. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76: 89–91. Candiana GB, Fedele L, Vercelli P, et al. Presacral neurectomy for the treatment of pelvic pain associated with endometriosis: a controlled study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 100–103. Chen FP, Chang SD, Chu KK, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic presacral neurectomy and laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation for primary dysmenorrhea. J Reprod Med. 1996; 41: 463–66. Curtis AH, Anson BJ, Ashley FL, et al. The anatomy of the pelvic autonomic nerves in relation to gynecology. Surg Obstet Gynecol 1942; 75: 743–50. DeLancey, JOL. Anatomy of the female pelvis. In: TeLinde’s operative gynecology, Seventh Ed. Thompson JD, Rock, JA; eds. Philadelphia, JB Lippincott, 1992, pp 33–65. Patsner B, Orr JW. Intractable venous sacral hemorrhage: use of stainless steel thumbtacks to obtain hemostasis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 452. Feste JR. Laser laparoscopy: a new modality. J Reprod Med 1985; 30: 413–17. Lichten EM, Bombard J. Surgical treatment of primary dysmenorrhea with laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation. J Reprod Med 1987; 32: 37–41. Sutton C, Hill D. Laser laparoscopy in the treatment of endometriosis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 181–85. Gurgan T, Urman B, Aksa T, et al. Laparoscopic CO2 laser uterine nerve ablation for treatment of drug resistant primary dysmenorrhea. Fertil Steril 1992; 58: 422–24. Good MC, Copas PR, Doody MC. Uterine prolapse after laparoscopic uterosacral transection. A case report. J Reprod Med 1992; 37: 995–96. Davis GD. Uterine prolapse after laparoscopic uterosacral transection in nulliparous airborne trainees: a report of three cases. J Reprod Med 1996; 41: 279–82. Fitzpatrick CC, Flood H, Punch M, et al. Bladder dysfunction after repeat laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation (LUNA). Int Urogynecol J 1995; 6: 31–33. Daniell JF. Personal Communication (October 1996). Johns A. Personal Communication (October 1996). Wilcox LS, Koonin LM, Pokras R, et al. Hysterectomy in the United States, 1988-1990. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83: 549–55. Carlson KJ, Miller BA, Fowler FJ. The Maine women’ s health study: I. Outcomes of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83: 556–65. Carlson KJ, Miller BA, Fowler FJ. The Maine women’ s health study: II. Outcomes of nonsurgical management of leiomyomas, abnormal bleeding, and chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83: 566–72. Stovall TG, Ling FW, Crawford DA. Hysterectomy for chronic pelvic pain of presumed uterine etiology. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75: 676–79. Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA, Peterson HB. The effectiveness of hysterectomy for chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 86: 941–45. Committee on gynecologic practice, Committee Opinion, ACOG, 1995, p 164. Bryson K. Laparoscopic appendectomy. J Gynecol Surg 1991; 7: 93–95. Fayez JA, Toy NJ, Flanagan TM. The appendix as a cause of chronic lower abdominal pain. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 122–23. Nezhat C, Nezhat F. Incidental appendectomy during videolaseroscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 559–64. Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 1983; 15: 59–64. Devereaux DA, McDermott JP, Caushaj PF. Recurrent appendicitis following laparoscopic appendectomy. Report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 719–20. Editor information Editors and Affiliations Rights and permissions Copyright information © 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York About this chapter Cite this chapter Sharp, H.T. (1998). Surgical Management of Pelvic Pain. In: Blackwell, R.E., Olive, D.L. (eds) Chronic Pelvic Pain. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1752-7_10 Download citation DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1752-7_10 Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7265-6 Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1752-7 eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (61)

Cited by (7)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK