A modified method of laparoscopic presacral neurectomy for the treatment of midline dysmenorrhea

Yu Chang, Eing‐Mei Tsai, Cheng-Yu Long, Wu-Chou Lin
In: Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · 2006 · vol. 13(3) , pp. 211–215 · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2006.01.001 · PMID:16698527 · W2101667158
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

This paper describes a modified laparoscopic technique for presacral neurectomy used to treat midline dysmenorrhea.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Study objectiveTo describe the modified surgical technique of laparoscopic presacral neurectomy.DesignA prospective trial (Canadian Task Force classification II-1).SettingUniversity hospital.PatientsForty-two women with severe midline dysmenorrhea.InterventionLaparoscopic modified presacral neurectomy (LMPSN).Measurements and main resultsWe designed a prospective study and used a zero-to-10 pain score system to evaluate 42 patients before and after LMPSN. Before surgery, each patient had pain scores ranging from 7 to 10 and had failed medical management. Mean time required to perform LMPSN was 7.33 +/- 1.76 minutes, and most women were discharged the day after surgery. The mean postoperative pain score of 2.02 +/- 2.25 was obtained 6 months after surgery and again at 12 months. No patient had intraoperative or long-term complications.ConclusionWhen a patient requires surgical treatment for chronic midline pelvic pain or severe dysmenorrhea, LMPSN is an alternative choice. It is relatively safe, simple to perform, and satisfactory. This modified surgical procedure appears to increasingly succeed in treatment of midline dysmenorrhea.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

dysmenorrhea

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (20)

Cited by (2)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T06:15:24.675520+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-23T06:29:45.520198+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK