The role of laparoscopic surgery in the evaluation of chronic pelvic pain of unknown origin: pitfalls with a negative laparoscopic findings
article
OA: bronze
CC0
AI-generated summary
This paper examines the challenges and limitations of laparoscopy in diagnosing chronic pelvic pain when the laparoscopic findings are negative.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (10)
- A randomized clinical trial to compare two different approaches in women with chronic pelvic pain via openalex
- Hysterectomy for chronic pelvic pain of presumed uterine etiology. via openalex
- Presacral neurectomy for chronic pelvic pain. via openalex
- Prevalence and genesis of endometriosis via openalex
- Prevalence and incidence of chronic pelvic pain in primary care: evidence from a national general practice database via openalex
- The resolution of chronic pelvic pain after normal laparoscopy findings via openalex
- The role of laparoscopy in the evaluation of chronic pelvic pain: Pitfalls with a negative laparoscopy via openalex
- The value of laparoscopy in women with chronic pelvic pain and a “normal pelvis” via openalex
- W2131501232 via openalex
- W3012576582 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK