The value of laparoscopy in women with chronic pelvic pain and a “normal pelvis”

In: International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · 1985 · vol. 23(1) , pp. 71–74 · doi:10.1016/0020-7292(85)90016-5 · PMID:2860038 · W2065353623
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 27 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-07

Laparoscopy revealed pelvic pathology in only 8.2% of women with chronic pelvic pain and a normal pelvic exam, suggesting routine laparoscopy is of low value and psychological assessment should be prioritized.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

During the period January 1976--December 1982 laparoscopy was performed on 186 women complaining of pelvic pain of at least 6 months' duration. In all these cases, the routine pelvic examination and other medical and laboratory tests were negative. Laparoscopy revealed pelvic pathology in only 8.2%: in the vast majority (91.8%) entirely normal pelvic organs were seen. Evidence from the literature is compiling as to the psychogenic origin of most cases of chronic pelvic pain. Recently, it has been shown that laparoscopically negative pelvic pain can be relieved or abolished by psychological intervention. Since pathological findings on laparoscopy are of very low percentage and since the pain is psychogenic in most cases, the value of routine laparoscopy in chronic pelvic pain is very low. We propose that all women with chronic pelvic pain and normal pelvic examination should undergo psychological assessment and treatment if necessary. Laparoscopy should then be reserved for only those cases who show no amelioration on psychological intervention. Our estimation is that this approach would reduce the rate of laparoscopies performed for chronic pelvic pain by about 90%.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

chronic_pelvic_pain

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (7)

Cited by (23)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK