Women's Perspectives on their Experiences of Chronic Pelvic Pain and Medical Care

In: Journal of Health Psychology · 1998 · vol. 3(1) , pp. 103–116 · doi:10.1177/135910539800300108 · PMID:22021346 · W2067802034
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 18 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10

This qualitative study interviewed women experiencing chronic pelvic pain after negative laparoscopy, finding persistent pain, limited ongoing care, and a need for validation and better information from healthcare providers.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

This study aimed to explore women's experiences of chronic pelvic pain (CPP). Twenty-one interviews with women 12 to 18 months after a negative laparoscopy were conducted. A predominantly qualitative methodology was adopted. The majority of women were still experiencing pain at this time, yet few were in receipt of continuing medical care. Women's accounts suggested that their pain continued to affect many areas of their lives, and issues including uncertainty, anxiety, and a sense of not being believed emerged. In provision of care, ways in which health professionals related to women were viewed as important, and had an impact in terms of whether or not they felt their pain had been validated. Dissatisfaction with the quality and quantity of information offered by professionals was a common finding. Based on women's accounts, implications for improving the quality of care for women with CPP are provided.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

chronic_pelvic_pain

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (51)

Cited by (18)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK