A meta‐ethnography of patients' experiences of chronic pelvic pain: struggling to construct chronic pelvic pain as ‘real’

review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 29 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This meta-ethnography integrated qualitative findings to reveal patients' struggles constructing chronic pelvic pain as real due to its unpredictable nature, secrecy, and validation by diagnosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

AIM: To review systematically and integrate the findings of qualitative research to increase our understanding of patients' experiences of chronic pelvic pain. BACKGROUND: Chronic pelvic pain is a prevalent pain condition with a high disease burden for men and women. Its multifactorial nature makes it challenging for clinicians and patients. DESIGN: Synthesis of qualitative research using meta-ethnography. DATA SOURCES: Five electronic bibliographic databases from inception until March 2014 supplemented by citation tracking. Of 488 papers retrieved, 32 met the review aim. REVIEW METHODS: Central to meta-ethnography is identifying 'concepts' and developing a conceptual model through constant comparison. Concepts are the primary data of meta-ethnography. Two team members read each paper to identify and collaboratively describe the concepts. We next compared concepts across studies and organized them into categories with shared meaning. Finally, we developed a conceptual model, or line of argument, to explain the conceptual categories. RESULTS: Our findings incorporate the following categories into a conceptual model: relentless and overwhelming pain; threat to self; unpredictability, struggle to construct pain as normal or pathological; a culture of secrecy; validation by diagnosis; ambiguous experience of health care; elevation of experiential knowledge and embodiment of knowledge through a community. CONCLUSION: The innovation of our model is to demonstrate, for the first time, the central struggle to construct 'pathological' vs. 'normal' chronic pelvic pain, a struggle that is exacerbated by a culture of secrecy. More research is needed to explore men's experience and to compare this with women's experience.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

mesh:D004715mesh:D017699chronic_pelvic_pain

MeSH descriptors

Attitude to Health Chronic Pain Chronic Pain Pelvic Pain Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Anthropology, Cultural Causality Chronic Pain Chronic Pain Comorbidity Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Humans Male Middle Aged

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (67)

Cited by (29)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:18:22.440000+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK