Impact of chronic pelvic pain on quality of life in diverse young adults

In: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · 2024 · vol. 310(6) , pp. 3147–3156 · doi:10.1007/s00404-024-07783-w · PMID:39441406 · W4403685165
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
Full text 13,003 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 6 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Purpose To examine the relationship between quality of life (QoL) and chronic pelvic pain (CPP), including an evaluation of whether differences exist between reported races and coping mechanisms used.

Methods

We used a cross-sectional survey design and analyzed data using descriptive and inferential statistics. We administered two surveys: the World Health Organization Quality of Life–BREF (26 items) and the Impact of Female Chronic Pelvic Pain Questionnaire (8 items). We recruited young adults aged 18–25 who menstruate from college campuses in a large metropolitan area in the Midwest region of the United States, utilizing flyers, online social media platforms, and snowball sampling techniques.

Results

Out of the 585 respondents, 153 (26%) reported “yes,” and 95 (16%) were “unsure” they had CPP. Those with CPP and unsure reported using various coping mechanisms for pain. They had lower scores in all four domains (physical health, psychological, social relationship, and environment) and statistically significant lower scores in three domains (physical health, social relationship, and environment) on the World Health Organization Quality of Life—BREF when compared to those who said “no.” Respondents identifying as Black, Indigenous, or People of Color had statistically significantly lower QoL in the physical health and environment domains compared to white respondents.

Conclusion

Young adults with CPP experience a significantly lower QoL than those without CPP, and racial differences further widen this gap. Future research should explore coping mechanisms that could benefit young adults’ daily lives. Similar content being viewed by others Data availability Data is available at Mendeley. Graeve, Catherine; Gao, Grace; Stephenson, Vera (2024), “CPP and Quality of Life”, Mendeley Data, V1, https://doi.org/10.17632/y9sz6sgrdm.1.

References

Katon JG, Plowden TC, Marsh EE (2023) Racial disparities in uterine fibroids and endometriosis: a systematic review and application of social, structural, and political context. Fertil Steril 119(3):355–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.01.022 Njoku A, Evans M, Nimo-Sefah L, Bailey J (2023) Listen to the whispers before they become screams: addressing black maternal morbidity and mortality in the United States. Healthcare 11(3):438. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11030438 Hoffman KM, Trawalter S, Axt JR, Oliver MN (2016) Racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations, and false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113(16):4296–4301. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113 Siqueira-Campos VM, de Deus MSC, Poli-Neto OB, Rosa-e-Silva JC, de Deus JM, Conde DM (2022) Current challenges in the management of chronic pelvic pain in women: from bench to bedside. Int J Women’s Health 14:225–244. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S224891 Toye F, Seers K, Barker K (2014) A meta-ethnography of patients’ experiences of chronic pelvic pain: struggling to construct chronic pelvic pain as ‘real.’ J Adv Nurs 70(12):2713–2727. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12485 Lamvu G, Carrillo J, Ouyang C, Rapkin A (2021) Chronic pelvic pain in women: a review. JAMA 325(23):2381. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.2631 Yosef A, Allaire C, Williams C, Ahmed AG, Al-Hussaini T, Abdellah MS, Wong F, Lisonkova S, Yong PJ (2016) Multifactorial contributors to the severity of chronic pelvic pain in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 215(6):760.e1-760.e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.023 Huang G, Le A-L, Goddard Y, James D, Thavorn K, Payne M, Chen I (2022) A systematic review of the cost of chronic pelvic pain in women. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 44(3):286-293.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2021.08.011 Mathias S (1996) Chronic pelvic pain: prevalence, health-related quality of life, and economic correlates. Obstet Gynecol 87(3):321–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-7844(95)00458-0 Sewell M, Churilov L, Mooney S, Ma T, Maher P, Grover SR (2018) Chronic pelvic pain – pain catastrophizing, pelvic pain and quality of life. Scand J Pain 18(3):441–448. https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2017-0181 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others (2004) ACOG practice bulletin #51: chronic pelvic pain. Obst Gynecol 103(3):589–605. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006250-200403000-00045 Cagnacci A, Della Vecchia E, Xholli A (2019) Chronic pelvic pain improvement: impact on quality of life and mood. Gynecol Endocrinol 35(6):502–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2018.1540571 Sarwar U, Rauf U (2021) Social support, quality of life and mental health problems among females with and without menstruation problems: a comparative study. Khyber Med Univer J 14(4):206–210. https://doi.org/10.35845/kmuj.2021.21373 Schoep ME, Nieboer TE, van der Zanden M, Braat DDM, Nap AW (2019) The impact of menstrual symptoms on everyday life: A survey among 42,879 women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 220(6):569.e1-569.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.048 WHOQOL: Measuring Quality of Life. (2024). World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/tools/whoqol Graeve CU, Stephenson VI, Helland RL, Gao G (2023) Exploring impact of menstrual symptoms on young adults and implications for nurse practitioners. Women’s Healthc: A Clin J for NPs 11(4):34–41. https://doi.org/10.51256/HC082334 Kalfoss MH, Reidunsdatter RJ, Klöckner CA, Nilsen M (2021) Validation of the WHOQOL-Bref: psychometric properties and normative data for the norwegian general population. Health Qual Life Outcomes 19(1):13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01656-x Sakthong P (2021) Mapping world health organization quality of life–BREF Onto 5-Level EQ-5D in Thai patients with chronic diseases. Value in Health 24(8):1089–1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2021.03.001 Jones GL, Kennedy SH, Jenkinson C (2002) Health-related quality of life measurement in women with common benign gynecologic conditions: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187(2):501–511. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.124940 Tripoli TM, Sato H, Sartori MG, de Araujo FF, Girão MJBC, Schor E (2011) Evaluation of quality of life and sexual satisfaction in women suffering from chronic pelvic pain with or without endometriosis. J Sex Med 8(2):497–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01976.x Laursen BS, Bajaj P, Olesen AS, Delmar C, Arendt-Nielsen L (2005) Health related quality of life and quantitative pain measurement in females with chronic non-malignant pain. Eur J Pain 9(3):267–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2004.07.003 Miller-Matero LR, Saulino C, Clark S, Bugenski M, Eshelman A, Eisenstein D (2016) When treating the pain is not enough: a multidisciplinary approach for chronic pelvic pain. Arch Women’s Mental Health 19(2):349–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-015-0537-9 As-Sanie S, Black R, Giudice LC, Gray Valbrun T, Gupta J, Jones B, Laufer MR, Milspaw AT, Missmer SA, Norman A, Taylor RN, Wallace K, Williams Z, Yong PJ, Nebel RA (2019) Assessing research gaps and unmet needs in endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 221(2):86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.033 Gin GT, Rosenblum E, Wilkinson LD, Brady PH (2022) Female pelvic conditions: chronic pelvic pain. FP Essentials 515:11–19 Poli-Neto OB, Tawasha KAS, Romão APMS, Hisano MK, Moriyama A, Candido-dos-Reis FJ, Rosa-e-Silva JC, Nogueira AA (2018) History of childhood maltreatment and symptoms of anxiety and depression in women with chronic pelvic pain. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 39(2):83–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2017.1306515 Monroe P, Campbell JA, Harris M, Egede LE (2023) Racial/ethnic differences in social determinants of health and health outcomes among adolescents and youth ages 10–24 years old: A scoping review. BMC Public Health 23(1):410. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15274-x Wallander JL, Fradkin C, Elliott MN, Cuccaro PM, Tortolero Emery S, Schuster MA (2019) Racial/ethnic disparities in health-related quality of life and health status across pre-, early-, and mid-adolescence: A prospective cohort study. Qual Life Res 28(7):1761–1771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02157-1 Trent M, Dooley DG, Section on Adolescent Health, County on Community Pediatrics, Committee on Adolsencse, Dougé J, Cavanaugh RM, Lacroix AE, Fanburg J, Rahmandar MH, Hornberger LL, Schneider MB, Yen S, Chilton LA, Green AE, Dilley KJ, Gutierrez JR, Duffee JH, Keane VA, Wallace SB (2019) The impact of racism on child and adolescent health. Pediatrics 144(2):e20191765. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-1765 Burke E, Di Renna T, Mustafa N, Ginter C, Carter W, Corkery C, Sheffe S, Wilson R, Lemos N, Bosma R (2024) Empowered management for pelvic pain: The experiences of women with persistent pelvic pain participating in an online self-directed self-management program while they wait for interprofessional care. Women’s Health 20:17455057231224960. https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057231224960 Katz L, Fransson A, Patterson L (2020) The development and efficacy of an interdisciplinary chronic pelvic pain program. Canadian Urol Assoc J. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.6842 Speer LM, Mushkbar S, Erbele T (2016) Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women. Am Fam Phys 93(5):380–387 Alsowayan N, Yong P, Allaire C, Noga H, Bedaiwy MA, Williams C (2018) Progestin only medications for chronic pelvic pain: Use patterns and causes of discontinuation. Fertil Steril 110(4):e83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.07.251 Maiorana A, Maranto M, Restivo V, Gerfo DL, Minneci G, Mercurio A, Incandela D (2023) Evaluation of long-term efficacy and safety of dienogest in patients with chronic cyclic pelvic pain associated with endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 309(2):589–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07271-7 Reavey J, Vincent K (2022) Chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med 32(1):8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogrm.2021.11.002 Cichowski SB, Rogers RG, Komesu Y, Murata E, Qualls C, Murata A, Murata G (2018) A 10 yr analysis of chronic pelvic pain and chronic opioid therapy in the women veteran population. Mil Med 183(11–12):e635–e640. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usy114 Bougie O, Nwosu I, Warshafsky C (2022) Revisiting the impact of race/ethnicity in endometriosis. Reprod Fertil 3(2):R34–R41. https://doi.org/10.1530/RAF-21-0106 Till SR, Nakamura R, Schrepf A, As-Sanie S (2022) Approach to diagnosis and management of chronic pelvic pain in women. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 49(2):219–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2022.02.006 Wang X, Ding N, Sun Y, Chen Y, Shi H, Zhu L, Gao S, Liu Z (2022) Non-pharmacological therapies for treating chronic pelvic pain in women: a review. Medicine 101(49):e31932. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031932

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by an Academic Excellence Grant (AEG) through the GHR Foundation. The AEG aims to improve societal health and well-being by preparing providers capable of practicing in emerging health-related environments. Funding This work was funded by an Academic Excellence Grant (AEG) through the GHR Foundation. The AEG aims to improve societal health and well-being by preparing providers capable of practicing in emerging health-related environments. Author information Authors and Affiliations Contributions CU Graeve: protocol/project development, data collection or management, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing; G Gao: protocol/project development, data collection or management, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing; VI Stephenson: protocol/project development, data collection or management, manuscript writing/editing; R Helland: protocol/project development, data collection or management, manuscript writing/editing; AD Jeffery: data analysis, manuscript writing/editing. Corresponding author Ethics declarations Conflict of interest The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. Ethical approval This study was approved by the St Catherine University Institutional Review Board. Consent to participate Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Consent to publish Consent to publish was obtained as part of the consent to participate. Additional information Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. About this article Cite this article Graeve, C., Gao, G., Stephenson, V. et al. Impact of chronic pelvic pain on quality of life in diverse young adults. Arch Gynecol Obstet 310, 3147–3156 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07783-w Received: Accepted: Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07783-w

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

chronic_pelvic_pain

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (38)

Cited by (2)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T06:41:50.100108+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK