What happens to women with chronic pelvic pain after a negative [normal] laparoscopy?

In: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · 2005 · vol. 25(3) , pp. 283–285 · doi:10.1080/01443610500105993 · PMID:16147737 · W2115150332
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 10 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09

Chronic pelvic pain persists in most women after a negative laparoscopy, though the procedure offers reassurance and some quality of life improvements.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Chronic pelvic pain remains unexplained in one third of women who have negative [normal] findings at diagnostic laparoscopy. This paper investigates the history of chronic pelvic pain after a negative laparoscopy and to assess the effect of negative laparoscopy on self perceived quality of life. The results of this study show that chronic pelvic pain persists in the majority of women who had negative laparoscopy in the medium to long term. It also shows that laparoscopy is beneficial in such group of women when findings are negative, due to its reassuring effect. A few quality of life issues also seem to improve despite persistence of chronic pelvic pain after a negative [normal] laparoscopy.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

chronic_pelvic_pain

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (10)

Cited by (10)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK