The role of laparoscopic surgery in the evaluation of chronic pelvic pain of unknown origin: pitfalls with a negative laparoscopic findings
OA: bronze
CC0
AI-generated summary
This paper examines the challenges and limitations of laparoscopy in diagnosing chronic pelvic pain when the laparoscopic findings are negative.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (2-hop)
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]
References (10)
- A randomized clinical trial to compare two different approaches in women with chronic pelvic pain via openalex
- Hysterectomy for chronic pelvic pain of presumed uterine etiology via openalex
- Presacral neurectomy for chronic pelvic pain via openalex
- Prevalence and genesis of endometriosis via openalex
- Prevalence and incidence of chronic pelvic pain in primary care: evidence from a national general practice database via openalex
- The resolution of chronic pelvic pain after normal laparoscopy findings via openalex
- The role of laparoscopy in the evaluation of chronic pelvic pain: pitfalls with a negative laparoscopy via openalex
- The value of laparoscopy in women with chronic pelvic pain and a "normal pelvis" via openalex
- W2131501232 via openalex
- W3012576582 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK