Fertility preservation in patients with endometriosis: Realistic approach or Future fantasy?

Orestis Tsonis, Fani Gkrozou, Minas Paschopoulos, Suruchi Pandey, Julia Kopeika
In: Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders · 2023 · vol. 15(3-4) , pp. 97–108 · doi:10.1177/22840265231209368 · W4388498695
article OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

This paper examines fertility preservation options for endometriosis patients, highlighting the need for tailored approaches that consider disease variability and distinguish between ovarian reserve and conception ability.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Fertility preservation techniques, such as cryopreservation of ovarian tissue, embryos, and oocytes, offer hope for future reproduction to individuals facing conditions like cancer or severe haematologic disorders. While the scientific evidence supporting fertility preservation is limited, it shows promise, and there is a growing trend among fertility experts to extend its application to patients with benign conditions that can cause fertility issues, such as endometriosis. Some forms of endometriosis may have a negative impact on fertility, affecting the ovarian reserve, oocyte quality, and the tubo-ovarian interface. Evaluating fertility preservation in endometriosis patients reveals several key considerations. The diverse nature of endometriosis calls for tailored approaches and distinguishing between the disease and treatment effects on ovarian reserve is crucial. Fertility preservation in endometriosis is complex, demanding consideration of disease variability, treatment effects, accurate assessment, and a clear distinction between ovarian reserve and conception ability. A personalised approach is essential for optimal outcomes in this field.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (100)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-01T06:38:16.588661+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK