Tumor markers and transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of endometrioma

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 39 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

Transvaginal ultrasonography alone showed strong agreement with surgical findings in diagnosing endometrioma, outperforming combined tumor marker tests.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of CA 19.9 plasma levels (with or without CA 125 levels) combined with transvaginal ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of endometrioma. METHODS: One hundred eighteen consecutive premenopausal nonpregnant women had laparoscopy or laparotomy between November 1994 and November 1995 because of the presence of a persistent adnexal mass. They underwent transvaginal ultrasonography and measurement of CA 19.9 and CA 125 plasma levels within 2 days before surgery. The ultrasonographic impression and the tumor marker values were compared with the histopathologic diagnosis. The overall agreement between the test result and the actual outcome was calculated using the kappa statistic. RESULTS: Transvaginal ultrasonography had a strong agreement between test result and surgery (kappa value 0.84), whereas the combined methods were associated with a lower kappa value (range 0.24-0.80). CONCLUSION: Transvaginal ultrasonography used alone is the most cost-effective method in the preoperative differential diagnosis of endometrioma.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisendometrioma

MeSH descriptors

Biomarkers, Tumor CA-19-9 Antigen Endometriosis Ovarian Diseases Adult Biomarkers, Tumor CA-125 Antigen CA-125 Antigen CA-19-9 Antigen Diagnosis, Differential Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Humans Laparoscopy Laparotomy Ovarian Diseases Ovarian Diseases Ovarian Diseases

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (22)

Cited by (38)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-27T09:11:36.575535+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:10:57.821266+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-03T06:31:36.481334+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK