Diagnosis, management, and long-term outcomes of rectovaginal endometriosis

Nash S Moawad, Andrea Caplin
International journal of women's health · 2013 · vol. 5 , pp. 753 · doi:10.2147/ijwh.s37846 · PMID:24232977 · PMC3825702 · W2019938344
review OA: gold CC0 ⤵ 33 in-corpus citations
📄 Open PDF View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This review details current approaches and techniques for diagnosing and managing rectovaginal endometriosis, outlining its symptoms, diagnostic methods, and various medical and surgical treatment options along with their potential outcomes and complications.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09 ⓘ

This review paper examines diagnosis, management strategies, and long-term outcomes for rectovaginal endometriosis, describing clinical presentation and evaluating presurgical diagnostic options such as clinical examination, transvaginal/transrectal ultrasound, MRI, colonoscopy, and CT colonography, while noting laparoscopy with histological confirmation as the gold standard. It summarizes medical and surgical treatment approaches, reporting that surgery can improve up to 70% of symptoms and outlining common procedures and complication types, including bleeding, anastomotic leaks, rectovaginal fistulas, strictures, constipation, and possible need for reoperation, with recurrence also possible. The paper’s limitation is that it is a narrative review rather than a single systematic, population-based study with uniform inclusion criteria, so the reported outcome ranges rely on aggregated prior evidence rather than new controlled data. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it specifically focuses on rectovaginal (rectal) endometriosis diagnosis, treatment options, and long-term outcomes.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Rectovaginal endometriosis is the most severe form of endometriosis. Clinically, it presents with a number of symptoms including chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia, dyschezia, and rectal bleeding. The gold standard for diagnosis is laparoscopy with histological confirmation; however, there are a number of options for presurgical diagnosis, including clinical examination, transvaginal/transrectal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imagining, colonoscopy, and computed tomography colonography. Treatment can be medical or surgical. Medical therapies include birth control pills, oral progestins, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, danazol, and injectable progestins. Analgesics are often used as well. Surgery improves up to 70% of symptoms. Surgery is either ablative or excisional, and is conducted via transvaginal, laparoscopic, laparotomy, or combined approaches. Common surgical techniques involve shaving of the superficial rectal lesion, laparoscopic anterior discoid resection, and low anterior bowel resection and reanastomosis. Outcomes are generally favorable, but postoperative complications may include intra-abdominal bleeding, anastomotic leaks, rectovaginal fistulas, strictures, chronic constipation, and the need for reoperation. Recurrence of rectal endometriosis is a possibility as well. Other outcomes are improved pain-related symptoms and fertility. Long-term outcomes vary according to the management strategy used. This review will provide the most recent approaches and techniques for the diagnosis and treatment of rectovaginal endometriosis.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisbowel_endometriosischronic_pelvic_paindysmenorrheadyspareunia

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (85)

Cited by (33)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-12T06:13:51.797165+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:18:47.062786+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK