Résections rectosigmoïdiennes cœlioscopiques pour endométriose digestive : résultats chirurgicaux et fonctionnels

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 11 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-12

This paper reports on the surgical and functional outcomes of laparoscopic rectosigmoid resections for patients with digestive endometriosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ObjectivesEvaluation of mid-term functional results and the quality of life after laparoscopic colorectal resection.Patients and methodsTwenty-three consecutive patients were included in a retrospective monocentric study. Postoperative functional outcomes and quality of life were analyzed.ResultsThe median follow-up after colorectal resection was of 24±15.7 months (6-72). Major complications occurred in three cases (12,9%) including one anastomotic stenosis, one digestive and one bladder fistula. A significant improvement in pelvic pain symptoms was observed. De novo constipation and pain on defecation occurred in respectively 23% and 42% of the cases. Transient de novo dysuria occurred in 18% of the cases. The quality of life has been significantly improved.ConclusionLaparoscopic colorectal resection is associated with unfavourable postoperative digestive and urological outcomes, such as bladder and rectal dysfunction. Radical treatment should be limited to selected patients.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosischronic_pelvic_pain

MeSH descriptors

Colon Digestive System Diseases Endometriosis Laparoscopy Laparoscopy Rectum Adult Colon Constipation Constipation Digestive System Diseases Digestive System Diseases Endometriosis Female Humans Middle Aged Pelvic Pain Postoperative Complications Postoperative Complications Quality of Life

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (34)

Cited by (11)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-09T06:10:49.860119+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:16:29.858026+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-09T06:42:26.407065+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK