Should the Gynecologist Perform Laparoscopic Bowel Resection to Treat Endometriosis? Results Over 7 Years in 168 Patients

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 56 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08

This retrospective study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic bowel resection for endometriosis treatment in 168 patients over a 7-year period.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Study objectiveTo assess the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic bowel resections for endometriosis performed by gynecologic surgeons.DesignRetrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force Classification II-3).SettingFertility and pelvic surgery clinics.PatientsOne hundred sixty-eight women (age 21-53 years) with symptoms including pelvic pain, infertility, or both with 252 bowel endometriotic lesions underwent laparoscopic bowel resection performed by gynecologic surgeons between May 2000 and January 2008.InterventionsLaparoscopic procedures for excision of several endometriotic nodes and lesions included shaving resection (LscShR), discoid resection (LscDR), segmental resection (LscSgR), terminal ileal resection (LscIR), partial cecal resection (LscCR), and appendectomy (LscAp).Measurements and main resultsThe 168 patients underwent 172 laparoscopic bowel resections (4 patients were operated on twice) by the same surgeon. Lesions were distributed as follows: 133 (79%) in the rectum, 61 (24%) in the sigmoid colon, 47 (19%) in the appendix, 5 (2%) in the terminal ileum, 3 (1%) in the descending colon, and 3 (1%) in the cecum. At surgeon discretion, 12 lesions were not resected. A total of 216 bowel procedures were necessary to remove the 240 lesions include shaving resection in 22 patients (10%), discoid resection in 52 (24%), segmental resection in 92 (42%), terminal ileal resection in 2 (1%), partial cecal resection in 1 (0.6), and appendectomy in 47 (22%). Major complications occurred in 13 patients (7.6%) and included rectovaginal fistula in 3 patients (1.7%), rectosigmoid anastomosis dehiscence and bowel occlusion in 1 patient each (0.6%), and persistent bowel dysfunction in 4 patients (2.3%). These results are comparable to those reported in the literature to date. Complete relief of symptoms (measured using the Visick scale) was noted in patients with dysmenorrhea (59%), dyspareunia (75%), noncyclic pelvic pain (90%), pain on defecation (100%), constipation (83%), and cyclic rectal bleeding (100%).ConclusionSurgery to treat bowel endometriosis can be safely and efficiently performed by the gynecologic pelvic surgeon. Meticulous training and a multidisciplinary approach to comprehensive operative care are necessary. These findings can be validated by prospective collaborative studies and reports from other surgeons.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Clinical Competence Endometriosis Gynecology Intestinal Diseases Laparoscopy Adult Clinical Competence Cohort Studies Endometriosis Endometriosis Feasibility Studies Female Gynecology Humans Intestinal Diseases Intestinal Diseases Laparoscopy Middle Aged Retrospective Studies Young Adult

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (34)

Cited by (50)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-15T06:16:59.523076+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:14:05.573375+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-15T06:33:26.365676+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK