Transcriptomic analysis of cumulus cells shows altered pathways in patients with minimal and mild endometriosis

article OA: gold CC0 ⤵ 7 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

Transcriptomic analysis of cumulus cells from patients with minimal and mild endometriosis revealed 26 differentially expressed genes and altered inflammatory and signaling pathways compared to controls.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09 · read from full text

This prospective case–control study used RNA-seq to compare the mRNA transcription profile of cumulus cells collected at oocyte retrieval from infertile women with minimal/mild endometriosis (endometriosis I/II, n=9) versus infertile controls with tubal abnormalities or male factor (n=9), using pooled samples for low RNA yield and paired-end sequencing with DESeq2 differential expression (FDR < 0.05). Compared with controls, cumulus cells from minimal/mild endometriosis showed 26 differentially expressed genes, and enrichment analyses implicated altered cytokine–cytokine receptor interactions, chemokine signaling, TNF/NF-κB-related inflammatory pathways, NOD-like receptor signaling, and an overall inflammatory response pattern, with all enriched genes downregulated except CXCL12. The paper’s approach had a major caveat that it used pooled cumulus cell samples and a small sample size, limiting resolution to individual variability. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it identifies transcriptomic pathway alterations in cumulus cells from patients with minimal and mild (stage I/II) endometriosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disorder that is highly associated with infertility. This association seems to be related to oocyte impairment, mainly in the initial stages of endometriosis (minimal and mild), where no distortions or adhesions are present. Nonetheless, invasive oocyte analyses are not routinely feasible; thus, indirect assessment of oocyte quality is highly desirable, and, in this context, cumulus cells (CCs) may be more suitable targets of analysis. CCs are crucial in oocyte development and could be used as an index of oocyte quality. Therefore, this prospective case–control study aimed to shed light on the infertility mechanisms of endometriosis I/II by analyzing the CCs’ mRNA transcription profile (women with endometriosis I/II, n = 9) compared to controls (women with tubal abnormalities or male factor, n = 9). The transcriptomic analyses of CCs from patients with minimal and mild endometriosis revealed 26 differentially expressed genes compared to the controls. The enrichment analysis evidenced some altered molecular processes: Cytokine-cytokine receptor interactions, Chemokine signaling, TNF signaling, NOD-like receptor signaling, NF-kappa B signaling, and inflammatory response. With the exception of CXCL12 , all enriched genes were downregulated in CCs from patients with endometriosis. These findings provide a significant achievement in the field of reproductive biology, directing future studies to discover biomarkers of oocyte quality in endometriosis.
Full text 39,050 characters · extracted from oa-pdf · 6 sections · click to expand

Materials and methods

Ethical approval. The Research Ethics Committee of the Clinical Hospital of Ribeirão Preto Medical School approved this prospective case–control study (Protocol No. 15113/2012, approval date December 5, 2012). All

Methods

were carried out following the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association and the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided written informed consent. Eligibility criteria. The endometriosis group consisted of patients in the initial stages of endometriosis (minimal and mild), diagnosed by video laparoscopy, in the absence of male infertility. The control group con- sisted of patients who underwent diagnostic video laparoscopy to rule out the presence of endometriosis and who were diagnosed with male and/or tubal factor-related infertility. Other eligibility criteria for both groups were age ≤ 39 years, body mass index (BMI) ≤ 34.9 kg/m2, and non- smoker. Participants presenting the following were excluded from the study: polycystic ovary syndrome or chronic anovulation; untreated endocrinopathies (diabetes or hypothyroidism); cardiovascular disease; dyslipi- demia; rheumatologic and auto-immune diseases, and active infection. Controlled ovarian stimulation protocol. All patients included in this study (endometriosis I/II and control patients) underwent controlled ovarian stimulation. After synchronizing the cycles using oral contra- ceptive pretreatment, controlled ovarian stimulation was carried out according to the needs of each patient and following the clinical protocols adopted in our Assisted Reproduction Program, as previously described29. Oocytes were retrieved from 34 to 36 h after the administration of hCG, and the luteal phase was maintained by vaginal administration of micronized progesterone (600 mg/day, Utrogestan®, Besins, Brazil). Sample collection. Samples were collected from all eligible patients who agreed to participate in the study from August 2014 to February 2016. The cumulus-oocyte complex was collected on oocyte retrieval, as previ- ously described by Da Luz et al. (2021)29. CCs were mechanically removed by microdissection, transferred to a cryotube containing 100 μL of cryopreserves (RNAlater®, Life Technologies, USA), and stored in liquid nitrogen at -196 °C until total RNA extraction. Total RNA. Total RNA was extracted from the CCs using the AllPrep DNA/RNA/miRNA Kit (Qiagen®, Ger- many). The total RNA samples were diluted in 20 μL of the recommended solution, and the concentrations were quantified with the Qubit RNA BR Assay Kit (Invitrogen, USA) in a Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Invitrogen, USA). According to the manufacturer’s instructions, RNA integrity was evaluated using the Agilent RNA 6000 Nano Kit (Agilent Technologies, USA) in an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, USA). Samples with an RNA Integrity Number (RIN) ≥ 7.0 were considered appropriate. Pool strategy. As explained in our previous study29, CCs have a considerably low concentration of total RNA; thus, we chose to cluster the samples in pools, a strategy described in several reports with CCs27,31–37 and recommended as effective38. Pools of 3 patients each yielded sufficient total RNA (≥ 120 ng) and enabled to keep the pool size small, as recommended38. All pools had RINs ≥ 7.0. The following clinical characteristics were considered for clustering the pools (in order of importance): age, number of oocytes collected; BMI; controlled ovarian stimulation protocol, and time after video laparoscopy. The samples in the pools were clustered heterogeneously, and the pools were homogeneous with each other. This strategy was adopted because we compared the groups, not individual samples. Library and RNA‑Seq. Library construction was carried out following the TruSeq® RNA Sample Prepara- tion v2 (Illumina Inc, USA) protocol. RNA-Seq was performed using the TruSeq Cluster Generation Kit v5 (Illumina Inc, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The six libraries were distributed into 2 lanes and underwent paired-end sequencing (PE 2 × 101 bp) using the HISEQ2500 Illumina Platform through High Output run. Bioinformatics. The quality control of the nucleotide sequences was conducted using the FastQC v0.11.2 program. The PRINSEQ v0.20.4 program was used to remove nucleotides that did not meet the quality. The 3 Vol.:(0123456789)Scientific Reports | (2022) 12:5775 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09386-4 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ mapping and quantification of the reads were performed using the STAR program (v. 020,201)39, with GRCh37. p7 as the reference genome, and Ensembl Release 85 for gene annotation. Subsequently, the normalization and differential expression between the groups were carried out using the Bioconductor DESeq2 (version 1.15.40)40 in the R statistical environment41. We considered differentially expressed genes (DEGs) the genes with adjusted p value (FDR) < 0.05. Heatmap plots were unsupervised and generated with the aheatmap function. Enrichment analysis. DEGs were analyzed using the DAVID-Bioinformatics Resources 6.8. database for relevant molecular processes and pathways. The proteins encoded by the DEGs were analyzed with the STRING 11.5 database for relevant interactions and pathways. The platforms Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Gene Ontology (GO) were also consulted when appropriate. Statistics. Exploratory data analysis was performed using measures of central tendency, dispersion, and box-plot plots. Clinical characteristics (age, BMI, infertility time, and the number of oocytes collected) were compared between groups using the Mann–Whitney test. All analyses were conducted using the SAS program, version 9.4. Data were presented as median, minimum, and maximum, and significance was defined as p < 0.05. Ethics approval. The Research Ethics Committee of the University Hospital approved this prospective case–control study (Protocol No. 15113/2012, approval date 12/05/2012), which was carried out following The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association. Consent to participate. All participants provided written informed consent (Protocol No. 15113/2012, approval date 12/05/2012). Consent for publication. All authors have read the manuscript and approved its publication.

Results

Flowchart. During the recruitment period, a total of 54 patients were deemed eligible. However, seven patients did not agree to participate in the study. Thus, 47 patients provided written informed consent and began controlled ovarian stimulation for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Ten patients did not undergo oocyte retrieval, whereas 37 did. There was no oocyte in 4 of them, and five patients exhibited few CCs, impeding dona- tion for the study. Therefore, the obtained CCs were donated by 28 patients. Total RNA was isolated from the CCs, and RNA integrity was assessed, although it was unacceptable in 10 samples. We obtained 18 samples, nine controls, and nine patients with endometriosis I/II; the samples were clustered in pools of three patients each. The flowchart is depicted in Fig. 1. Clinical variables. No significant differences between groups were observed regarding age, BMI, infertility time, and the number of oocytes (Table 1). The majority of patients (83.3%; N:15) were submitted to the flexible antagonist protocol plus rFSH or menotropin. Only 3 (16.7%; 1 control and two endometriosis I/II patients) underwent the minimal stimulation protocol. RNA next‑generation sequencing. Approximately 50 million reads per sample were obtained with RNA-Seq, and the average mapping quality was 92.8%. RNA-Seq provides the differential gene expression pro- files in CCs of patients with endometriosis I/II compared to the controls. Such analysis enabled us to obtain a list of 26 DEGs (21 down-regulated and five up-regulated, in endometriosis I/II) with adjusted p < 0.05 as significant (Fig. 2). Figure 1. Flowchart of the study. 4 Vol:.(1234567890)Scientific Reports | (2022) 12:5775 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09386-4 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Functional enrichment analysis. The 26 DEGs of endometriosis I/II were used to perform the enrich- ment analysis. The main enriched pathways potentially associated with infertility-related endometriosis in the CCs were: Cytokine-cytokine receptor interactions, Chemokine signaling pathway, Tumor-Necrosis Factor (TNF) signaling pathway, Nucleotide-binding Oligomerization Domain (NOD)-like receptor signaling path- way, and Nuclear Factor (NF)-kappa B signaling pathway (Table 2). Some genes were present in more than one pathway, all of which share multiple genes. Interestingly, all enriched genes underwent a negative regulation of Table 1. Clinical variables of women with endometriosis I/II and controls. Data presented as median (minimum and maximum). E I/II, minimal and mild endometriosis; BMI, Body Mass Index. p value < 0.05. Clinical variables Control (N = 9) E I/II (N = 9) P value Age (years) 34 (30; 39) 36 (33; 39) 0.34 BMI (kg/m2) 24.23 (19.88; 30.22) 25.52 (22.60; 32.05) 0.72 Infertility time (months) 84 (24; 139) 30 (11; 192) 0.18 Number of oocytes retrieved 9 (2; 13) 8 (2; 15) 0.89 Figure 2. Unsupervised heatmap of the 26 DEGs of CCs from patients with endometriosis I/II compared to the controls. 5 Vol.:(0123456789)Scientific Reports | (2022) 12:5775 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09386-4 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ expression in the CCs of the patients with endometriosis I/II compared to the controls, except for the CXCL12, which was up-regulated. The enrichment analysis also highlighted an essential biological process, the inflam- matory response with 12 altered genes (CCL20, CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL3, CXCL5, CXCL8, CXCL12, TNFAIP3, TNFRSF9, IL1A, IRAK2, and NFKB1) (p < 0.001). Of the 26 DEGs, 25 were protein-coding genes. These genes encode 25 proteins, which were used to enrich protein–protein interaction networks (Fig. 3). The protein–protein interaction enrichment p value was < 1.0e−16. The same pathways enriched using DEGs were found in the protein analysis (Fig. 3). The interaction enrich- ment showed that these proteins have significantly more interactions among themselves than expected for a random set of proteins of the same size and degree distribution drawn from the genome. Such enrichment indicates that the proteins are at least partially biologically connected as a group.

Discussion

Endometriosis related to infertility seems to be associated with oocyte impairment, mainly in the initial stages of endometriosis, when no distortions or adhesions in the reproductive tract are present6,42,43. Exposure to hostile environments with macrophages, cytokines, and reactive oxygen species in the peritoneal and follicular fluid could lead to dysfunctional folliculogenesis and worsen oocyte quality5,13,44,45. Within this environment, the cross-talk between oocyte and CCs is crucial for oocyte development24,25. Therefore, CCs reflect oocyte status and could be used as an index of oocyte quality10,12,27,28. A large-scale analysis is essential to comprehend the biological changes in CCs. This study was the first to evaluate the transcriptome of CCs from infertile patients with endometriosis I/II compared to women without the disease. The differential gene expression profile in the CCs of patients with endometriosis I/II showed 26 DEGs compared to the controls, demonstrating that endometriosis I/II is related to the deregulation of the CCs’ tran- scriptome. Subsequently, enrichment analysis showed altered molecular mechanisms in the CCs of patients with endometriosis I/II; Cytokine-cytokine receptor interactions, Chemokine signaling, TNF signaling, NOD-like receptor signaling, and NF-kappa B signaling. These pathways are related to immunity, and, except for CXCL12, all enriched genes are downregulated in endometriosis CCs. Allegra et al. (2014) also found deregulated genes in all these pathways from CCs of women with severe endometriosis by microarray analysis27. It is known that endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease that can cause excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation and, consequently, intra-follicular oxidative stress, even in infertile women with endometriosis I/II 46. Lin et al. (2020) found an increase in ROS in the granulosa cells of patients with endo- metriosis and suggested that this process induces cell senescence, contributing to endometriosis-associated infertility47. This proinflammatory and ROS-filled microenvironment can trigger immune system pathways like those found in our study. NOD-like receptors are known as recognition receptors, responsible for recognizing pathogen-associated molecular patterns released by damaged cells48. The activation of these receptors leads to the transcription of several genes, including NFKB, which induces inflammatory cytokines and chemokines49,50. In the ovary, cytokines and chemokines promote leukocyte recruitment and activation, steroidogenesis, follicular growth, and ovulation51,52. In the literature, several cytokines are found down-regulated in endometriosis CCs when compared to the controls. Moreover, follicular fluid cytokines appear to be related to successful pregnancy following IVF treatments52. The TNF signaling pathway acts in several processes, including cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis, in addition to the modulation of immune and inflammatory responses53. In part of this pathway, the gene TNFAIP6 plays an essential role in forming the extracellular matrix of the cumulus-oocyte complex54,55. Allegra et al. (2014) showed the down-regulation of the TNFAIP6 gene in CCs of patients with endometriosis27. All of these pathways are essential for ovulation, as well as fertilization. The expansion of the cumulus-oocyte complex can be improved by activating Toll-like receptors, followed by genes such as NFKB, besides cytokines and chemokines50. An inflammatory process marks the rupture of the follicle. Moreover, sperm induces the release of cytokines and chemokines from CCs, enhancing the fertilization process56,57. Therefore, alterations in these intricate molecular mechanisms may compromise oocyte quality and decrease fertilization rates. The main limitation of this study was its small sample size, resulting from the strict eligibility criteria adopted and the low RNA integrity and concentrations in CCs. Also, pooling samples might not be beneficial when the gene expression levels display low variability and reduce samples. However, small RNA sample pools effectively reduce the variability and compensate for the loss of replicates38. Furthermore, the data obtained from studies Table 2. In silico enrichment analysis of 26 DEGs of CCs from patients with endometriosis I/II. The in silico enrichment analysis was performed using the DAVID-Bioinformatics Resources 6.8 tool and KEGG database. ↑ = Positively regulated. All other genes were negatively regulated. P value < 0.05. Pathways Genes P value Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction CXCL12↑, CCL20, CXCL1, CXCL3, CXCL5, CXCL8, TNFRSF9, CSF3, and IL1A 2.3e−4 Chemokine signaling CXCL12↑, CCL20, CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL3, CXCL5, CXCL8, and NFKB1 2.3e−7 TNF signaling CCL20, CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL3, TNFAIP3, BIRC3, ICAM1 and NFKB1 4.5e−9 NOD-like receptor signaling CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL8, TNFAIP3, BIRC3, and NFKB1 3.6e−4 NF-kappa B signaling CXCL12↑, CXCL8, TNFAIP3, BIRC3, ICAM1, and NFKB1 2.1e−6 6 Vol:.(1234567890)Scientific Reports | (2022) 12:5775 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09386-4 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ using samples collected after different controlled ovarian stimulation protocols may not necessarily be extrapo- lated to natural cycles. In conclusion, the present study shows, for the first time, that endometriosis I/II could promote alterations in the transcriptome of CCs. These results provide a better understanding of the mechanisms (Cytokine-cytokine receptor interactions, Chemokine, TNF , NF-kappa B, NOD-like receptor signaling, and inflammatory response) that may affect oocyte competence acquisition in patients with endometriosis I/II. These pathways share a vari- ety of genes and cannot be considered an individualized process. This differential transcription profile provides a significant achievement in the field of reproductive biology, directing future studies with a larger cohort to discover biomarkers of oocyte quality in endometriosis, be they pathways or genes. Figure 3. In silico enrichment analysis of 25 proteins encoded by DEGs of the CCs from patients with endometriosis I/II. Note Protein-coding gene = identified outside the nodes. Nodes = proteins (inside the nodes is the protein 3D structure). The colors of the nodes represent the pathways in which they were enriched. White nodes are the second shell of interactions. Edges = protein–protein associations. There are 86 edges. The white nodes on the left side, without edges, have no protein–protein associations. FDR, False Discovery Rate. Created in STRING. Permanent link: https:// versi on- 11-5. strin gdb. org/ cgi/ netwo rk? netwo rkId= bAvx7 jSmic 41. 7 Vol.:(0123456789)Scientific Reports | (2022) 12:5775 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09386-4 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Data availability The RNA-sequencing data underlying this article is available in the repository Sequence Read Archive (SRA) of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (Permanent link: https:// www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/ sra/? term= PRJNA 808988), study number: PRJNA808988. Other datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Received: 30 September 2021; Accepted: 11 March 2022

References

1. Giudice, L. C. & Kao, L. C. Endometriosis. Lancet 364, 1789–1799. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ s0140- 6736(04) 17403-5 (2004). 2. ASRM. Revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 1997(67), 817–821 (1996). 3. Burney, R. O. & Giudice, L. C. Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 98, 511–519. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. fertn stert. 2012. 06. 029 (2012). 4. Holoch, K. J. & Lessey, B. A. Endometriosis and infertility. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 53, 429–438. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ GRF . 0b013 e3181 db7d71 (2010). 5. Da Broi, M. G. & Navarro, P . A. Oxidative stress and oocyte quality: Ethiopathogenic mechanisms of minimal/mild endometriosis- related infertility. Cell Tissue Res. 364, 1–7. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00441- 015- 2339-9 (2016). 6. Simon, C. et al. Outcome of patients with endometriosis in assisted reproduction: Results from in-vitro fertilization and oocyte donation. Hum. Reprod. 9, 725–729 (1994). 7. Sung, L., Mukherjee, T., Takeshige, T., Bustillo, M. & Copperman, A. B. Endometriosis is not detrimental to embryo implantation in oocyte recipients. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 14, 152–156 (1997). 8. Da Broi, M. G. et al. Increased concentration of 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine in follicular fluid of infertile women with endome- triosis. Cell Tissue Res. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00441- 016- 2428-4 (2016). 9. Garcia-Velasco, J. A. & Arici, A. Is the endometrium or oocyte/embryo affected in endometriosis?. Hum. Reprod. 14(Suppl 2), 77–89 (1999). 10. Barcelos, I. D. et al. Down-regulation of the CYP19A1 gene in cumulus cells of infertile women with endometriosis. Reprod. Biomed. Online 30, 532–541. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. rbmo. 2015. 01. 012 (2015). 11. Barcelos, I. D. et al. Comparative analysis of the spindle and chromosome configurations of in vitro-matured oocytes from patients with endometriosis and from control subjects: A pilot study. Fertil. Steril. 92, 1749–1752. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. fertn stert. 2009. 05. 006 (2009). 12. Donabela, F . C., Meola, J., Padovan, C. C., de Paz, C. C. & Navarro, P . A. Higher SOD1 gene expression in cumulus cells from infertile women with moderate and severe endometriosis. Reprod. Sci. 22, 1452–1460. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 19337 19115 585146 (2015). 13. Da Broi, M. G., Malvezzi, H., Paz, C. C., Ferriani, R. A. & Navarro, P . A. Follicular fluid from infertile women with mild endome- triosis may compromise the meiotic spindles of bovine metaphase II oocytes. Hum. Reprod. 29, 315–323. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ humrep/ det378 (2014). 14. Andrade, A. Z. et al. Serum markers of oxidative stress in infertile women with endometriosis. Rev. Bras. Ginecol. Obstet. 32, 279–285 (2010). 15. Da Broi, M. G. et al. Influence of follicular fluid and cumulus cells on oocyte quality: Clinical implications. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 35, 735–751. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10815- 018- 1143-3 (2018). 16. Bulletti, C., Coccia, M. E., Battistoni, S. & Borini, A. Endometriosis and infertility. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 27, 441–447. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10815- 010- 9436-1 (2010). 17. Barnhart, K., Dunsmoor-Su, R. & Coutifaris, C. Effect of endometriosis on in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril. 77, 1148–1155. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ s0015- 0282(02) 03112-6 (2002). 18. Ouandaogo, Z. G. et al. Differences in transcriptomic profiles of human cumulus cells isolated from oocytes at GV , MI and MII stages after in vivo and in vitro oocyte maturation. Hum. Reprod. 27, 2438–2447. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ humrep/ des172 (2012). 19. Ouandaogo, Z. G. et al. Human cumulus cells molecular signature in relation to oocyte nuclear maturity stage. PLoS ONE 6, e27179. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ journ al. pone. 00271 79 (2011). 20. Assou, S., Haouzi, D., De Vos, J. & Hamamah, S. Human cumulus cells as biomarkers for embryo and pregnancy outcomes. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 16, 531–538. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ molehr/ gaq032 (2010). 21. McKenzie, L. J. et al. Human cumulus granulosa cell gene expression: A predictor of fertilization and embryo selection in women undergoing IVF . Hum. Reprod. 19, 2869–2874. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ humrep/ deh535 (2004). 22. Tanghe, S., Van Soom, A., Nauwynck, H., Coryn, M. & de Kruif, A. Minireview: Functions of the cumulus oophorus during oocyte maturation, ovulation, and fertilization. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 61, 414–424. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ mrd. 10102 (2002). 23. Furger, C., Cronier, L., Poirot, C. & Pouchelet, M. Human granulosa cells in culture exhibit functional cyclic AMP-regulated gap junctions. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2, 541–548 (1996). 24. Albertini, D. F . & Barrett, S. L. Oocyte-somatic cell communication. Reprod. Suppl. 61, 49–54 (2003). 25. Combelles, C. M., Carabatsos, M. J., Kumar, T. R., Matzuk, M. M. & Albertini, D. F . Hormonal control of somatic cell oocyte interactions during ovarian follicle development. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 69, 347–355. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ mrd. 20128 (2004). 26. Hizaki, H. et al. Abortive expansion of the cumulus and impaired fertility in mice lacking the prostaglandin E receptor subtype EP(2). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 10501–10506 (1999). 27. Allegra, A. et al. The gene expression profile of cumulus cells reveals altered pathways in patients with endometriosis. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 31, 1277–1285. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10815- 014- 0305-1 (2014). 28. da Luz, C. M. et al. PTGS2 down-regulation in cumulus cells of infertile women with endometriosis. Reprod. Biomed. Online 35, 379–386. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. rbmo. 2017. 06. 021 (2017). 29. Da Luz, C. M. et al. Altered transcriptome in cumulus cells of infertile women with advanced endometriosis with and without endometrioma. Reprod. Biomed. Online 42, 952–962. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. rbmo. 2021. 01. 024 (2021). 30. Poli-Neto, O. B., Meola, J., Rosa, E. S. J. C. & Tiezzi, D. Transcriptome meta-analysis reveals differences of immune profile between eutopic endometrium from stage I-II and III-IV endometriosis independently of hormonal milieu. Sci. Rep. 10, 313. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41598- 019- 57207-y (2020). 31. Adriaenssens, et al. Cumulus cell gene expression is associated with oocyte developmental quality and influenced by patient and treatment characteristics. Hum. Reprod. 25, 1259–1270. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ humrep/ deq049 (2010). 32. Assou, S. et al. The human cumulus–oocyte complex gene-expression profile. Hum. Reprod. 21, 1705–1719. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ humrep/ del065 (2006). 33. Hamel, M. et al. Identification of differentially expressed markers in human follicular cells associated with competent oocytes. Hum. Reprod. 23, 1118–1127. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ humrep/ den048 (2008). 8 Vol:.(1234567890)Scientific Reports | (2022) 12:5775 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09386-4 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ 34. van Montfoort, A. P . et al. Differential gene expression in cumulus cells as a prognostic indicator of embryo viability: A microarray analysis. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 14, 157–168. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ molehr/ gam088 (2008). 35. Bettegowda, A. et al. Identification of novel bovine cumulus cell molecular markers predictive of oocyte competence: Functional and diagnostic implications. Biol. Reprod. 79, 301–309. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1095/ biolr eprod. 107. 067223 (2008). 36. Assidi, M. et al. Identification of potential markers of oocyte competence expressed in bovine cumulus cells matured with follicle- stimulating hormone and/or phorbol myristate acetate in vitro. Biol. Reprod. 79, 209–222. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1095/ biolr eprod. 108. 067686 (2008). 37. Ferrero, H. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing of oocytes from ovarian endometriosis patients reveals a differential transcriptomic profile associated with lower quality. Hum. Reprod. 34, 1302–1312. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ humrep/ dez053 (2019). 38. Takele Assefa, A., Vandesompele, J. & Thas, O. On the utility of RNA sample pooling to optimize cost and statistical power in RNA sequencing experiments. BMC Genomics 21, 312. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s12864- 020- 6721-y (2020). 39. Dobin, A. et al. STAR: Ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ bioin forma tics/ bts635 (2013). 40. Love, M. I., Huber, W . & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s13059- 014- 0550-8 (2014). 41. Team RDC. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (2008). 42. Saito, H. et al. Endometriosis and oocyte quality. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 53(Suppl 1), 46–51 (2002). 43. Y anushpolsky, E. H. et al. Effects of endometriomas on ooccyte quality, embryo quality, and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization cycles: A prospective, case-controlled study. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 15, 193–197. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1023/a: 10230 48318 719 (1998). 44. Jianini, B. et al. Peritoneal fluid from infertile women with minimal/mild endometriosis compromises the meiotic spindle of metaphase II bovine oocytes: A pilot study. Reprod. Sci. 24, 1304–1311. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 19337 19116 687658 (2017). 45. Pellicer, A. et al. The follicular and endocrine environment in women with endometriosis: Local and systemic cytokine production. Fertil. Steril. 70, 425–431 (1998). 46. Da Broi, M. G., Jordão, A. A. Jr., Ferriani, R. A. & Navarro, P . A. Oocyte oxidative DNA damage may be involved in minimal/mild endometriosis-related infertility. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 85, 128–136. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ mrd. 22943 (2018). 47. Lin, X. et al. Excessive oxidative stress in cumulus granulosa cells induced cell senescence contributes to endometriosis-associated infertility. Redox. Biol. 30, 101431. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. redox. 2020. 101431 (2020). 48. Zhang, R. N. et al. The CXCL12-CXCR4 signaling promotes oocyte maturation by regulating cumulus expansion in sheep. Theri- ogenology 107, 85–94. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. theri ogeno logy. 2017. 10. 039 (2018). 49. Liu, Z. et al. Interleukin-6: An autocrine regulator of the mouse cumulus cell-oocyte complex expansion process. Endocrinology 150, 3360–3368. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1210/ en. 2008- 1532 (2009). 50. Liu, Z., Shimada, M. & Richards, J. S. The involvement of the Toll-like receptor family in ovulation. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 25, 223–228. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10815- 008- 9219-0 (2008). 51. Büscher, U., Chen, F . C., Kentenich, H. & Schmiady, H. Cytokines in the follicular fluid of stimulated and non-stimulated human ovaries; is ovulation a suppressed inflammatory reaction?. Hum. Reprod. 14, 162–166. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ humrep/ 14.1. 162 (1999). 52. Sarapik, A. et al. Follicular proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines as markers of IVF success. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2012, 606459. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1155/ 2012/ 606459 (2012). 53. Bradley, J. R. TNF-mediated inflammatory disease. J. Pathol. 214, 149–160. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ path. 2287 (2008). 54. Fülöp, C. et al. Impaired cumulus mucification and female sterility in tumor necrosis factor-induced protein-6 deficient mice. Development 130, 2253–2261. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1242/ dev. 00422 (2003). 55. Milner, C. M. & Day, A. J. TSG-6: A multifunctional protein associated with inflammation. J. Cell Sci. 116, 1863–1873. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1242/ jcs. 00407 (2003). 56. Richards, J. S., Russell, D. L., Robker, R. L., Dajee, M. & Alliston, T. N. Molecular mechanisms of ovulation and luteinization. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 145, 47–54. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ s0303- 7207(98) 00168-3 (1998). 57. Gérard, N., Caillaud, M., Martoriati, A., Goudet, G. & Lalmanach, A. C. The interleukin-1 system and female reproduction. J. Endocrinol. 180, 203–212. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1677/ joe.0. 18002 03 (2004).

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the staff of the Human Reproduction Division of the RPMS of the University of São Paulo, particularly Maria Cristina Picinato, Roberta Giorgenon, Camila Kokudai, and Thalita Berteli for collecting the CCs, and Lilian Eslaine da Silva and Cristiana Carolina Padovan for their technical assistance. Author contributions C.M.L. was responsible for the study design, sample collection and preparation, acquisition of data, and inter - pretation of the results, as well as manuscript writing. M.G.B. provided substantial contributions to the study design, data interpretation, and manuscript review. L.O.K. contributed with sample analysis, acquisition of data, and manuscript review. J.R.P . was responsible for the bioinformatics analysis and contributed to data interpreta- tion. W .A.S. contributed to data interpretation and manuscript review. R.A.F . provided important intellectual content, sample collection, and manuscript review. J.M. contributed to data interpretation and critically revising the manuscript for important intellectual content. P .A.N. contributed to the study design, data interpretation, critical review of the manuscript, and was the project coordinator. All authors have approved the final version and submission of the manuscript. Funding This work was supported by the Research Support Foundation of the State of São Paulo (grant No. 2014/05878-7 and fellowship No. 2014/026830, C.M.L.), and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development through the Brazilian National Institute of Hormones and Women’s Health (fellowship No. 88887.141452/2017- 00, M.G.B.). Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Additional information Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to C.M.D.L. 9 Vol.:(0123456789)Scientific Reports | (2022) 12:5775 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09386-4 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints. Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creat iveco mmons. org/ licen ses/ by/4. 0/. © The Author(s) 2022

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-pdf

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

mesh:D004715endometriosisinfertility

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Infertility, Female Infertility, Female Infertility, Female Case-Control Studies Case-Control Studies Cumulus Cells Cumulus Cells Cumulus Cells Female Female Humans Humans Male Male Oocytes Oocytes Oocytes

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (56)

Cited by (7)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-15T00:34:46.439362+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK