Disregarded, devalued and lacking diversity: an exploration into women’s experiences with endometriosis. A systematic review and narrative synthesis of qualitative data

Sophie Cunnington, Amy Cunnington, Atsumi Hirose
In: Journal of Endometriosis and Uterine Disorders · 2024 · vol. 8 , pp. 100087 · doi:10.1016/j.jeud.2024.100087 · W4400940865
review OA: diamond CC0 ⤵ 9 in-corpus citations
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-06 ⓘ

This systematic review synthesized qualitative data on women's endometriosis experiences, finding continued medical and social under-support and highlighting gaps in participant diversity in research.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

• Endometriosis is a burdensome disease with extensive, long-term effects on women. • Socio-cultural variation impacts how women experience endometriosis. • Research into effective management strategies particularly for dyspareunia is vital. • Patient-provider settings require enhanced disease knowledge, trust and sensitivity. • Continued lack of participant diversity in research needs addressing. Endometriosis is a burdensome gynaecological condition linked to the culturally variable concepts of menstruation and reproduction. Despite this, qualitative endometriosis research has been concentrated in high-income, anglophone countries. This systematic review and narrative synthesis primarily aimed to provide updated insights on endometriosis experiences, whilst secondarily investigating improvements in research diversity and reporting of socio-cultural experiences. Six online databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science and CINAHL) were searched on 27th March 2023 for English, peer-reviewed articles published between January 2013 and March 2023. An updated search was performed on 24th March 2024 to extend the inclusion date to March 2024. English-written dissertation and thesis papers were also eligible. Included studies investigated first-hand endometriosis experiences of women or those assigned female at birth using a qualitative or mixed-method design. Participants were aged 16 and above, with a surgical diagnosis or histological confirmation. Additional relevant articles were identified from the reference lists of eligible articles. Risk of bias was assessed using the CASP tool for qualitative research. 26 papers reporting on 22 studies were included (569 participants, age range: 17–55). Greater diversity in study geographies was evident compared to previous reviews despite largely recruiting from high-income countries via clinical settings. Thematic analysis using inductive coding captured significant experiences, particularly regarding anticipated infertility and positive healthcare encounters, and revealed partial insight into socio-cultural pressures and experiences associated with endometriosis. However, significant evidence gaps in disease coping and management mechanisms were evident, specifically regarding partner support and alternative intimacy strategies. Furthermore, participant homogeneity contributed to an incomplete evidence base across sexualities, ages, ethnicities, and socio-economic backgrounds. Findings highlight that sufferers continue to be left unsupported medically and socially. Future priorities should focus on addressing the participant diversity gap, providing comprehensive disease guidance, empowering sufferers in patient-provider settings and improving healthcare professionals’ disease knowledge.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisdyspareuniainfertility

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (75)

Cited by (13)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK