Abstract
Endometriosis is a chronic gynecological disorder affecting approximately 10% of reproductive-aged women globally, leading
to significant pain, infertility, and diminished quality of life. Despite advancements in diagnosis and management, knowledge
gaps among nursing professionals continue to hinder effective patient -centered care. Thi s study examines the knowledge and
practices of nursing care for women with endometriosis in Cyprus, a country where cultural stigmas and disparities in women's
health training may impact healthcare delivery. Using a systematic review methodology, relevant peer-reviewed studies from
databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL were analyzed based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. A PRISMA
framework guided article selection, while a random effects model meta -analysis assessed trends in nursing competence and
practice variability. Findings indicate that many Cypriot nurses lack adequate knowledge of endometriosis pathophysiology,
symptom management, and multidisciplinary approaches, leading to delays in diagnosis and inconsistent care. Furthermore,
continuing professional development (CPD) opportunities specific to endometriosis remain limited, contributing to nurses’
reliance on generalized gynecological knowledge. Cultural barriers also constrain open discussions about menstrual health,
further complicating early intervention efforts. The study highlights the need for structured educational programs, standardized
nursing protocols, and culturally sensitive communication strategies to improve care quality. Future research should explore the
long-term impact of targeted training on nursing competency and patient outcomes. Addressing these gaps will strengthen the
role of nurses in endometriosis management and enhance healthcare experiences for affected women in Cyprus.
Keywords
Knowledge, Practices, Nursing Care, Endometriosis, Symptoms and Diagnosis
1. Introduction
Endometriosis is a chronic gynecological condition that
affects approximately 10% of reproductive -aged women
worldwide, causing debilitating symptoms such as pelvic pain,
dysmenorrhea, and infertility [32]. In recent years, attention
has grown on how nursing care practices influence the ma n-
agement of endometriosis, emphasizing a need for targeted
knowledge among healthcare providers to enhance patient
outcomes [25]. Cyprus, with its unique healthcare system and
cultural context, offers a valuable case for understanding how
nurses approach endometriosis care, as recent studies indicate
disparities in awareness and clinical training specific to
women’s health issues, including endometriosis [22].
Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics http://www.sciencepg.com/journal/jgo
56
In Cyprus, approximately 12% of reproductive-aged women
are estimated to suffer from endometriosis, paralleling rates
found in Greece and Italy, where rates range from 10-13% [14].
In African countries, the prevalence appears somewhat lower
but is likely underreported due to limited diagnostic resources
and cultural barriers that affect healthcare -seeking behavior.
For instance, in Nigeria and South Africa, studies estimate rates
between 5-8%, with many cases undiagnosed due to the scar-
city of specialists and accessible diagnostic tools [3]. Mean-
while, in Asian countries, endometriosis rates are comparable
to Europe, but they vary widely. Japan reports a prevalence of
around 10-12%, reflecting strong healthcare infrastructure and
awareness [29]. In contrast, India and Indonesia report lower
diagnosed prevalence rates, around 4-7%, attributed to cultural
stigmas and disparities in healthcare access [20].
Cyprus’s healthcare system and cultural context shape both
positive and negative aspects of nursing care for endometri o-
sis patients [8]. On the positive side, Cyprus has a strong
primary healthcare system and a growing awareness of
women’s health issues, which supports a foundation for p a-
tient-centered care [35]. Nurses are general ly trained to pr o-
vide holistic care, potentially improving the quality of life for
endometriosis patients through supportive care, counseling,
and pain management strategies that address both physical
and emotional needs [24]. Additionally, Cyprus has rece ntly
emphasized continuing education in nursing, which enables
nurses to stay updated on the latest guidelines and ev i-
dence-based practices for managing endometriosis.
However, challenges remain. Disparities in endometriosis
awareness and clinical training lead to inconsistencies in the
diagnosis and management of the condition [7, 15]. Due to
cultural stigmas around discussing menstrual and reprodu c-
tive health, many women delay seeking care or are hesitant to
share symptoms fully, complicating early diagno sis and
comprehensive treatment [19, 28]. Furthermore, limited sp e-
cialized training in women’s health for nurses result in insu f-
ficient knowledge of endometriosis, potentially leading to
delayed diagnosis or mismanagement of symptoms [16, 14].
These gaps underline the need for culturally sensitive training
programs that equip nurses with the necessary skills to a d-
dress endometriosis comprehensively and sensitively in Cy p-
riot healthcare settings.
This research focuses on examining the knowledge and
practices of nursing professionals in Cyprus regarding e n-
dometriosis care, as well as identifying gaps that affects the
quality of patient-centered care for women with this condition.
Despite advancements in global healthcare guidelines, ev i-
dence shows that the kno wledge and confidence of nursing
staff in managing endometriosis vary significantly, often
impacting the timeliness and accuracy of care provided.
Considering these issues, this study will explore how nursing
practices in Cyprus align with current clinical guidelines,
providing insights into potential areas for improvement in
both education and practice.
(1) Objectives
1. Assess the current knowledge and understanding of
endometriosis among nurses in Cyprus.
2. Evaluate the nursing practices and care provided to
women with endometriosis in Cyprus.
(2) Hypotheses
H01: there is no significant relationship between the level of
knowledge and understanding of endometriosis among nurses
in Cyprus.
H02: The nursing practices and care provided to women
with endometriosis in Cyprus shows no significant difference
in quality or effectiveness from an average benchmark.
2. Literature Review
Supporting nursing care for women with endometriosis in
Cyprus benefit is dependent on healthcare theory like the
Pender’s Health Promotion Mo del (HPM). This model e m-
phasizes the role of healthcare providers in motivating p a-
tients to engage in health -promoting behaviors, which is pa r-
ticularly relevant in managing endometriosis. In Cyprus,
where cultural barriers prevent open discussions on menstrual
health, nurses trained in the HPM framework encourages
women to seek care earlier and discuss symptoms more
openly, thereby potentially reducing delayed diagnoses [4].
The HPM suggests that by increasing nurses' awareness and
promoting a supportive environment, healthcare providers can
empower women to take proactive steps in managing end o-
metriosis, leading to improved long-term health outcomes.
2.1. Knowledge and Understanding of
Endometriosis Among Nurses in Cyprus
(1) Endometriosis
Endometriosis is a ch ronic gynecological condition where
tissue like the endometrial lining found inside the uterus b e-
gins to grow outside the uterus, commonly affecting the ov a-
ries, fallopian tubes, and pelvic lining [31]. This tissue r e-
sponds to hormonal changes in the same way as the uterine
lining, thickening and shedding with each menstrual cycle, yet
it has no natural exit from the body, causing inflammation,
scarring, and adhesions [5]. While the exact cause of end o-
metriosis remains unknown, several theories suggest co n-
tributing factors, such as retrograde menstruation, where
menstrual blood flows backward through the fallopian tubes;
immune system dysfunction, which fails to clear the mi s-
placed tissue; genetic predisposition; and hormonal imba l-
ances [18].
(2) Symptoms and Diagnosis
Endometriosis presents with a range of symptoms, with the
most common being chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea
(painful periods), dyspareunia (pain during intercourse), and
infertility [30]. Other symptoms can include heavy menstrual
bleeding, fatigue, and gastrointestinal issues like bloating and
diarrhea [1]. Symptoms vary widely in severity, and some
women with endometriosis remain asymptomatic, compl i-
Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics http://www.sciencepg.com/journal/jgo
57
cating timely diagnosis. Diagnosis typically involves a co m-
bination of symptom assessment, pelvic exams, imaging tests
like ultrasound or MRI, and in some cases, laparoscopy, a
minimally invasive surgical procedure that allows direct vi s-
ualization and biopsy of suspected endometriotic tissue,
which remains the gold standard for diagnosis [22].
(3) Treatment Options
While there is no cure for endometriosis, treatment aims to
relieve symptoms and improve quality of life. Nonsteroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for pain relief and ho r-
monal therapies to reduce or eliminate menstruation, which
helps contr ol pain and lesion growth [27]. For those with
severe symptoms or unresponsive to medical therapy, surgical
options like laparoscopy can be used to remove or reduce
endometrial tissue [9]. In cases where endometriosis affects
fertility, assisted reproductive technologies like in vitro fert i-
lization (IVF) may be recommended [11]. Complementary
Methods
such as dietary modifications, physical therapy, and
psychological support can also play a role in symptom ma n-
agement, as they address overall wellbeing and alleviate stress
associated with chronic illness [5, 17].
Assessing the current knowledge and understanding of
endometriosis among nurses in Cyprus reveals a mixed pi c-
ture, influenced by both healthcare system strengths and li m-
itations in specialized training. While there is a foundation of
general awareness, recent research indicates that gaps in sp e-
cialized knowledge hinder optimal care for endometriosis
patients, largely due to limited training opportunities and
cultural barriers [14, 2]. Many Cypriot nurses possess a basic
understanding of endometriosis symptoms, such as pelvic
pain and irregular menstruation. However, studies reveal that
they often lack in -depth knowledge regarding the complex
pathophysiology, progression, and multi -system impac ts of
endometriosis [6]. This limited understanding affects their
ability to recognize fewer common symptoms, which may
lead to missed diagnoses and delays in care.
Nurses also report low confidence levels in managing
chronic pain associated with endometri osis, largely due to
insufficient training in women’s health and pain management
protocols [17]. The need for clearer guidelines and continuous
education is emphasized by several studies, as nurses often
express a desire for improved resources to effectively support
patients through both physical and emotional challenges
posed by endometriosis.
Cultural stigmas surrounding reproductive health further
compound these challenges. Many nurses in Cyprus work in a
cultural environment where discussions about mens trual
health are often seen as taboo, impacting both patient ope n-
ness and provider -patient communication [21]. Leininger’s
Culture Care Theory, which emphasizes the importance of
culturally competent care, supports the need for specialized
training to addr ess these cultural nuances, enabling nurses to
engage in sensitive discussions with endometriosis patients
while overcoming societal barriers.
2.2. Nursing Practices and Care Provided to
Women with Endometriosis in Cyprus
Evaluating nursing practices and care for women with e n-
dometriosis in Cyprus reveals a combination of strengths and
gaps within healthcare delivery. Effective management of
endometriosis begins with a comprehensive assessment of
symptoms. Nurses and healthcare providers should conduct
thorough interviews with patients to gather detailed info r-
mation about their menstrual history, pain characteristics, and
associated symptoms such as gastrointestinal issues or urinary
problems. A standardized assessment tool, like the Endom e-
triosis Health Pr ofile (EHP -30), can help quantify symptom
severity and its impact on quality of life. The assessment
should also include a physical examination, focusing on pe l-
vic examinations to identify potential endometrial lesions or
tenderness.
Once symptoms are asse ssed, management strategies
should be tailored to everyone. These strategies often involve
a combination of pharmacological and non -pharmacological
approaches, emphasizing a holistic view of patient care. E d-
ucation is vital, as patients should understand t he nature of
endometriosis, the potential variability of symptoms, and the
available treatment options [27].
Pain management is a cornerstone of endometriosis trea t-
ment, given that chronic pelvic pain is one of the most debi l-
itating symptoms associated wit h the condition. Initial pain
relief often involves nonsteroidal anti -inflammatory drugs
(NSAIDs), which can help manage menstrual pain and overall
discomfort [12]. However, nurses should also assess the need
for more advanced pain management strategies if patients
experience inadequate relief from NSAIDs. For those with
severe or persistent pain, hormonal therapies may be consi d-
ered. These treatments aim to suppress menstruation and
reduce the growth of endometrial tissue. Options include
hormonal contrace ptives, GnRH agonists, and progestins,
each with different mechanisms and side effect profiles [5].
Furthermore, nurses should be aware of potential side effects
associated with these treatments and provide patients with
information to manage them effectiv ely. In addition to me d-
ication, complementary therapies —such as acupuncture,
physical therapy, and dietary modifications —can play a
supportive role in pain management [11]. Nurses should e n-
courage patients to explore these options while emphasizing
the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to care.
Hormonal treatments are a key component in managing
endometriosis. Hormonal contraceptives, including birth
control pills, patches, and intrauterine devices (IUDs), are
often first-line options that can regulate menstrual cycles and
alleviate pain [9]. For patients who do not respond to ho r-
monal therapy or who have significant endometriosis -related
complications, surgical options may be warranted. Lap a-
roscopy is commonly employed to excise or ablate end o-
metrial lesions, and in more severe cases, a hysterect omy
may be recommended, especially for women who do not
Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics http://www.sciencepg.com/journal/jgo
58
desire future fertility [33]. Nurses play a critical role in
preparing patients for surgical interventions by providing
education about the procedures, recovery expectations, and
potential complicatio ns. Post-operative care also falls within
the nursing scope, requiring monitoring for complications,
pain management, and encouraging adherence to follow -up
appointments.
Referral practices are essential for providing comprehe n-
sive care to women with endom etriosis. Nurses should estab-
lish a clear referral pathway for patients needing specialized
care, including gynecologists, pain management specialists,
and mental health professionals. Early and appropriate refe r-
rals can facilitate timely interventions and improve overall
patient outcomes. In addition, multidisciplinary care models
that involve collaboration among healthcare professionals can
enhance treatment effectiveness. For instance, integrating
physical therapy into a patient's care plan may address p ain
management, while a dietitian can provide guidance on n u-
trition that may alleviate some symptoms [10].
2.3. Barriers and Challenges in Endometriosis
Care
Despite advancements in understanding and managing
endometriosis, numerous barriers and challenges hinder e f-
fective care for affected women. These challenges include
lack of knowledge or training among healthcare providers,
limited resources within healthcare systems, and p a-
tient-related factors that impact treatment access and ou t-
comes.
One of the mos t significant barriers to effective endom e-
triosis care is the inadequate knowledge and training among
healthcare providers, particularly nurses and general pract i-
tioners. Studies have highlighted that many healthcare pr o-
fessionals possess limited understanding of endometriosis, its
symptoms, and the latest treatment options [23]. This
knowledge gap can lead to misdiagnosis, delayed treatment,
and insufficient management of symptoms. For instance,
healthcare providers may not recognize atypical presentations
of endometriosis, resulting in underdiagnosis or misdiagnosis
as other conditions, such as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) or
pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) [13].
Limited resources in healthcare systems, particularly in
developing regions or within spec ific institutions, can pose
significant challenges to providing adequate endometriosis
care. Resource constraints may manifest in various forms,
including insufficient access to diagnostic tools such as
ultrasound and MRI, limited availability of specializ ed
healthcare providers, and inadequate funding for treatment
options [11]. In some cases, the lack of multidisciplinary
care teams —including gynecologists, pain specialists, and
mental health professionals —can hinder comprehensive
treatment approaches. Wi thout access to a full range of
services, patients may experience delays in receiving timely
and appropriate care. Furthermore, limited financial r e-
sources may impact patients' ability to afford necessary
treatments, such as hormonal therapies or surgical interven-
tions, leading to worsening symptoms and decreased quality
of life [27].
Patient-related factors also play a critical role in the
challenges faced in managing endometriosis. Many women
with endometriosis experience a range of barriers that pr e-
vent them from seeking timely medical attention. Stigmas
associated with menstruation and reproductive health issues
can lead to feelings of shame or embarrassment, causing
women to delay seeking help [34]. Additionally, a lack of
awareness about endometriosis among patients themselves
can contribute to misunderstandings about their symptoms
and treatment options. Moreover, the variability of sym p-
toms can lead to differing levels of pain and disability, which
may impact women's ability to navigate the healthcare sys-
tem effectively. Some women may prioritize managing their
symptoms independently or rely on informal networks for
support, rather than seeking professional medical advice
[26].
3. Methodology
This study employs a structured methodology to assess the
knowledge and practices of nurses in Cyprus concerning
endometriosis care. An online questionnaire serves as the
primary data collection tool. This survey is distributed
through professional networks, with the cooperation of ho s-
pital and clinic administrator s, and via relevant social media
groups to maximize participation. The questionnaire co m-
prises a variety of question types —such as multiple -choice
questions, Likert scales, and open -ended responses —to col-
lect both quantitative data for statistical analysis and qualita-
tive insights that capture nuanced perspectives on endom e-
triosis care.
A structured online questionnaire was distributed among
registered nurses and midwives in various healthcare settings,
yielding a sample size of 120 respondents s, a range d eemed
adequate to provide statistically significant insights and a
representative understanding of the nursing population i n-
volved in women’s healthcare within Cyprus. To ensure d i-
versity, the study sample encompass nurses from various
healthcare settings, including hospitals, clinics, and comm u-
nity health centers, with respondents representing both urban
and rural regions of Cyprus.
3.1. Exclusion Criteria
Eligible participants include registered nurses, midwives,
and nurse practitioners, as these roles ar e most frequently
engaged in obstetric and gynecological care and, cons e-
quently, more likely to encounter and manage endometriosis
cases. By concentrating on these specializations, the study
aims to gather responses from professionals with relevant,
practical experience in women’s health, which is critical for
Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics http://www.sciencepg.com/journal/jgo
59
understanding current endometriosis care practices in Cyprus.
The systematic review employs well -defined exclusion crite-
ria to ensure the selection of relevant studies. The inclusion
criteria focus on peer-reviewed studies published within the
last ten years, specifically addressing nursing knowledge and
practices in endometriosis care. Studies that examine the
impact of nursing interventions on patient outcomes, inclu d-
ing qualitative and quantitative research, are considered. A d-
ditionally, research involving nurses in Cyprus or countries
with comparable healthcare systems is included to provide
contextually relevant findings.
To maintain focus on established practitioners, the excl u-
sion criteria for th e study specify that nurses with less than
one year of experience are not eligible to participate. This
decision aims to avoid responses from individuals who do not
have sufficient exposure to endometriosis cases or who have
not developed a comprehensive u nderstanding of clinical
practices in women’s health.
3.2. Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion criteria eliminate studies that do not explicitly
focus on nursing practices, lack empirical data, or focus on
unrelated gynecological conditions. Reviews without met h-
odological transparency, non -English publications, and case
reports that do not contribute to broader conclusions about
nursing knowledge are also excluded. These criteria help
refine the dataset and ensure a robust evidence base for
analysis.
4. Analysis
PRISMA Diagram
A PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic
Reviews and Meta-Analyses) diagram is used to illustrate the
article selection process. The initial search identifies nume r-
ous studies from databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and
CINAHL. After removing duplicates and screening titles and
abstracts, a subset of studies undergoes full-text review based
on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The final selection i n-
cludes high -quality studies directly relevant to the research
objectives. The PRISMA d iagram enhances transparency by
visually representing how many studies were included, e x-
cluded, and the reasons for exclusion.
4.1. Data Extraction
Data extraction follows a structured approach using a
standardized template. Key information from each selec ted
study is compiled, including author(s), publication year, study
design, sample size, data collection methods, key findings,
and limitations. The review focuses on variables such as
nurses' understanding of endometriosis, training initiatives,
barriers to effective care, and patient outcomes. The extracted
data facilitate thematic synthesis and ensure consistency
across multiple studies.
4.2. Meta-analysis Methods (Random Effects
Model)
Given the expected heterogeneity among the studies, a
meta-analysis is conducted using a random effects model.
This approach accounts for variations in study populations,
methodologies, and healthcare settings. The model aggregates
effect sizes from different studies, providing a weighted e s-
timate of overall trends in nurs ing knowledge and practices
regarding endometriosis care. Sensitivity analysis is pe r-
formed to assess the robustness of the findings, and public a-
tion bias is examined using funnel plots and Egger’s test.
4.3. Position of the Paper
The reviewed paper situat es itself within the growing di s-
course on improving nursing competencies in women's health,
particularly concerning endometriosis. It builds on theoretical
frameworks such as Pender’s Health Promotion Model and
Leininger’s Culture Care Theory, emphasizing the importance
of culturally sensitive and evidence -based nursing practices.
By focusing on Cyprus, the study contributes a regional pe r-
spective to the broader discussion on enhancing nursing e d-
ucation and care models for endometriosis management.
4.4. Results
The systematic review identifies several key findings. First,
knowledge gaps among Cypriot nurses regarding endometr i-
osis are evident, particularly in understanding pathophysio l-
ogy, symptom management, and multidisciplinary care a p-
proaches. Many nurse s demonstrate limited confidence in
diagnosing and managing endometriosis -related pain due to
inadequate training.
Second, disparities in nursing education and continuing
professional development (CPD) programs affect the quality
of care. Studies show that nurses with specialized training in
women’s health are better equipped to provide p a-
tient-centered care, while those lacking formal education on
endometriosis rely on general gynecological knowledge,
which may not be sufficient.
Third, cultural barriers i n Cyprus hinder open discussions
about menstrual and reproductive health, leading to delays in
diagnosis and inadequate symptom management. P a-
tient-nurse communication is often constrained by societal
stigmas, preventing women from fully disclosing symptoms.
Finally, the review highlights the effectiveness of mult i-
disciplinary approaches, including pain management prot o-
cols, psychological support, and patient education. Studies
indicate that integrating evidence -based guidelines into
nursing curricula and C PD programs improves both nurse
confidence and patient outcomes.
Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics http://www.sciencepg.com/journal/jgo
60
4.5. Limitations
Several limitations affect the systematic review. The
availability of studies on nursing care for endometriosis in
Cyprus is limited, necessitating reliance on data from co m-
parable healthcare systems. Variations in study methodol o-
gies, sample sizes, and outcome measures introduce heter o-
geneity, which, despite the use of a random effects model,
affects the generalizability of findings. Additionally, language
restrictions to English publications may result in the exclusion
of relevant studies published in Greek. The self -reported
nature of some studies may also introduce response bias, as
nurses may overestimate their knowledge or adherence to best
practices.
4.6. Conclusion and Recommendations
The systematic review underscores the critical need for
targeted nursing education and policy reforms to improve
endometriosis care in Cyprus. The findings suggest that
structured training programs should be integrated into nursing
curricula to enhance knowledge and confidence in managing
endometriosis. Continuing professional development courses
focused on pain management, diagnostic awareness, and
patient communication are necessary to bridge the identified
gaps.
Additionally, fostering cu lturally sensitive nursing pra c-
tices can help mitigate barriers to patient -nurse communica-
tion. Public health campaigns aimed at normalizing discu s-
sions about menstrual health may further encourage early
diagnosis and intervention. The review also recommen ds the
development of standardized protocols and guidelines for
nursing care in endometriosis management, ensuring co n-
sistency in care delivery.
Future research should explore the long -term impact of
educational interventions on nursing competency and pati ent
outcomes. Further studies employing longitudinal designs and
qualitative methods could provide deeper insights into the
evolving landscape of endometriosis care in Cyprus. E x-
panding the scope to include cross -cultural comparisons may
also offer valuable lessons on best practices for nursing care in
diverse healthcare settings.
By implementing these recommendations, healthcare
stakeholders in Cyprus can enhance the role of nurses in e n-
dometriosis management, ultimately improving patient care
and health outcomes.
Abbreviations
CPD Continuing Professional Development
IUDs Intrauterine Devices
IBS Irritable Bowel Syndrome
PID Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
NSAIDs Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs
EHP-30 Endometriosis Health Profile
HPM Health Promotion Model
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1] Afrose, A., 2024. Evaluation of endometriosis risk factors,
symptoms, and clinical treatments in Bangladesh: a
cross-sectional study (Doctoral dissertation, Brac University).
[2] Ajegbile, M. D., Olaboye, J. A., Maha, C. C., Igwama, G. T.
and Abdul, S., 2024. The role of data -driven initiatives in e n-
hancing healthcare delivery and patient retention. World
Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 19(1), pp.
234-242.
[3] Baissa, O. T., Ben -Shushan, T. and Paltiel, O., 2024. Ly m-
phoma in Sub -Saharan Africa: a scoping review of the epid e-
miology, treatment challenges, and patient pathways. Cancer
Causes & Control, pp. 1-32.
[4] Bontempo, A. C., 2024. Conceptualizing Symptom I nvalida-
tion as Experienced by Patients With Endometriosis. Qualit a-
tive Health Research, p. 10497323241253418.
[5] Bulun, S. E. (2023) ‘Endometriosis’, The New England Jou r-
nal of Medicine, 378(3), pp. 233-244.
[6] Christou, A., Stylianou, A. and Kyriakides, A. (202 4)
‘Knowledge and practices of nurses regarding endometriosis
care in Cyprus’, Journal of Nursing Practice, 12(2), pp. 87-96.
[7] Cunnington, S., Cunnington, A. and Hirose, A., 2024. Disr e-
garded, devalued and lacking diversity: An exploration into
women’s experiences with endometriosis. A systematic review
and narrative synthesis of qualitative data. Journal of End o-
metriosis and Uterine Disorders, p. 100087.
[8] De Tena Sanz, A., Martí nez Lara, A., Durá n Gonzá lez, E.,
Reyes Conde, M. I., Dí az Ló pez, C., Pé rez Sá nchez, M.,
Ramí rez Tejero, J. A., Horcajadas Almansa, J. A. and Cotá n,
D., 2024. P -324 Finding on the gut microbiome impact on
non-reproductive pathologies of the uterus: an endometriosis
perspective. Human Reproduction, 39(Supplement_1), pp.
deae108-274.
[9] Dunselman, G. A. J., Vermeulen, N., Becker, C., et al. (2023)
‘European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
(ESHRE) guideline: Endometriosis’, Human Reproduction,
28(3), pp. 270-280.
[10] Erickson, N., Sullivan, E. S., Kalliostra, M., Laviano, A. and
Wesseling, J., 2023. Nutrition care is an integral part of p a-
tient-centred medical care: a European consensus. Medical
Oncology, 40(4), p. 112.
[11] Garcia-Velasco, J. A. and Somigliana, E. (2024) ‘The role of
assisted reproductive technologies in the management of en-
dometriosis’, Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 30(1), pp.
29-40.
Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics http://www.sciencepg.com/journal/jgo
61
[12] Giudice, L. C. (2024) ‘Symptoms of endometriosis: a review’,
Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, 51(1),
pp. 25-37.
[13] Graziottin, A. and Maseroli, E., 2023. A Clinical Conversation
on the Uroandrological Perspective. Practical Clinical, p. 319.
[14] Hadjipanayis, A., et al. (2023) ‘Endometriosis awareness
among nurses in Cyprus: Current status and training needs’,
Nursing Outlook, 71(5), pp. 580-588.
[15] Hansen, K. E., Brandsborg, B., Kesmodel, U. S., Forman, A.,
Kold, M., Pristed, R., Donchulyesko, O., Hartwell, D. and
Vase, L., 2023. Psychological interventions improve quality of
life despite persistent pain in endometriosis: results of a
3-armed randomized controlled trial. Quality of Life Research,
32(6), pp. 1727-1744.
[16] Harzif, A. K., Nurbaeti, P., Sayogo Putri, A., Silvana, V.,
Andyra, A. F. and Wiweko, B., 2024. Factors associated with
delayed diagnosis of endometriosis: A systematic review.
Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders, p.
22840265241291120.
[17] Hegazy, A. A., 2024. A new look at the theoretical causes of
endometriosis: Narrative review. International Journal of R e-
productive BioMedicine (IJRM), pp. 343-356.
[18] Howard, A. F., Noga, H., Kelly, M. T., Gholamian, B., Lett, S.,
Sutherland, J. and Yong, P. J., 2024. Women’s
self-management of dyspareunia associated with endometri o-
sis: a qualitative study. The Journal of Pain, p. 104492.
[19] Klein, R. D. ed., 2024. Infertility: Women speak out about their
experiences of reproductive medicine. Taylor & Francis.
[20] Kumar, A. and Roy, S. (2024) ‘Cultural barriers to endom e-
triosis diagnosis in India and Indonesia’, Asian Journal of
Women's Health, 20(1), pp. 65-72.
[21] Lieon, R. and Postman, K., 2024. Reproductive Health in the
21st Century : Challenges and Opportunities. International
Journal of Advanced Engineering Technologies and Innov a-
tions, 1(4).
[22] Mick, I., Freger, S. M., van Keizerswaard, J., Gholiof, M. and
Leonardi, M., 2024. Comprehensive endometriosis care: a
modern multimodal appro ach for the treatment of pelvic pain
and endometriosis. Therapeutic Advances in Reproductive
Health, 18, p. 26334941241277759.
[23] Mikesell, L. and Bontempo, A. C., 2023. Healthcare providers’
impact on the care experiences of patients with endometriosis:
The value of trust. Health communication, 38(10), pp.
1981-1993.
[24] Molina, A., Carter, A., Alexander, L., Davé , A. and Riley, K.,
2024. Holistic approach to care for patients with endometriosis.
Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, pp. 10-1097.
[25] Onkendi, R. I., 2024. Endometriosis: assessing knowledge,
perceptions, and experiences of patients’ encounters with
health care professionals.
[26] Pao, P. S., 2023. Social Stigma Centred around Menstruation:
A Reflective Review. Frontier Anthropology, 11, pp. 51-58.
[27] Parker, M., et al. (2024) ‘Pain management strategies for
women with endometriosis’, Pain Medicine, 25(4), pp.
781-790.
[28] Pereira, S., Ribeiro, M., Mendes, M., Ferreira, R., Santos, E.,
Fassarella, C. and Ribeiro, O., 2024. Positive Nursing Practice
Environment: A Concept Analysis. Nursing Reports, 14(4), pp.
3052-3068.
[29] Saito, S., et al. (2024) ‘Endometriosis prevalence and awar e-
ness in Japan: A national survey’, Japanese Journal of Obste t-
rics and Gynecology, 77(2), pp. 193-200.
[30] Santulli, P., Bourdon, M., Desp ortes, C., Maignien, C., P o-
cate-Cheriet, K., Patrat, C., Marcellin, L. and Chapron, C.,
2024. Assessment of the pelvic pain experienced by infertile
women is of prime importance for diagnosing endometriosis.
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology.
[31] Simmen, R. C., Quick, C. M. and Zheng, W., 2024. Endom e-
triosis and endometriosis -associated tumors. In Gynecologic
and Obstetric Pathology (pp. 1 -31). Singapore: Springer N a-
ture Singapore.
[32] Swift, B., Taneri, B., Becker, C. M., Basarir, H., Naci, H.,
Missmer, S. A., Zondervan, K. T. and Rahmioglu, N., 2024.
Prevalence, diagnostic delay and economic burden of end o-
metriosis and its impact on quality of life: results from an
Eastern Mediterranean population. European Journal of Public
Health, 34(2), pp. 244-252.
[33] Urman, B., Ata, B. and Gomel, V., 2024. Reproductive surgery
remains an essential element of reproductive medicine. Facts,
Views & Vision in Obgyn, 16(2), p. 145.
[34] Vercellini, P., et al. (2024) ‘Endometriosis: Clinical manag e-
ment and future perspectives’, T he Lancet, 403(10323), pp.
331-344.
[35] You, J. G. T., Leung, T. I., Pandita, D. and Sakumoto, M.,
2024. Primary Care Informatics: Vitalizing the Bedrock of
Health Care. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, p.
e60081.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.