Promoting Physical Activity and Limiting Sedentary Behaviors to Manage Pain in Endometriosis: What Are the Psychosocial Variables to Take into Account?

In: Women's Reproductive Health · 2025 · vol. 13(2) , pp. 447–467 · doi:10.1080/23293691.2025.2582496 · W4416182065
article OA: green CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This review identifies psychosocial factors like pain catastrophizing, fear of movement, and depression that influence physical activity and sedentary behavior management in endometriosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

The provided “paper body” contains an anti-bot protection page (Anubis) rather than the research content, so the study’s objectives, population/methods, and findings cannot be determined from the text available. No biomedical results, psychosocial variables, or conclusions about pain management are presented in what was supplied. The paper’s title indicates an intended focus on psychosocial variables related to physical activity and sedentary behavior in managing pain in endometriosis, but those claims are not substantiated by the missing article text. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it is titled about psychosocial variables for managing pain with physical activity and limiting sedentary behaviors in endometriosis, though the actual content was not accessible in the provided excerpt.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

International audience
Full text 1,068 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Making sure you're not a bot! Loading... You are seeing this because the administrator of this website has set up Anubis to protect the server against the scourge of AI companies aggressively scraping websites. This can and does cause downtime for the websites, which makes their resources inaccessible for everyone. Anubis is a compromise. Anubis uses a Proof-of-Work scheme in the vein of Hashcash, a proposed proof-of-work scheme for reducing email spam. The idea is that at individual scales the additional load is ignorable, but at mass scraper levels it adds up and makes scraping much more expensive. Ultimately, this is a placeholder solution so that more time can be spent on fingerprinting and identifying headless browsers (EG: via how they do font rendering) so that the challenge proof of work page doesn't need to be presented to users that are much more likely to be legitimate. Please note that Anubis requires the use of modern JavaScript features that plugins like JShelter will disable. Please disable JShelter or other such plugins for this domain.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (91)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK