Diagnostic value of transvaginal 'tenderness-guided' ultrasonography for the prediction of location of deep endometriosis

Human Reproduction · 2008 · vol. 23(11) , pp. 2452–2457 · doi:10.1093/humrep/den293 · PMID:18664469 · W2134983497
article OA: bronze CC0 ⤵ 136 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

Transvaginal tenderness-guided ultrasonography demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for vaginal and rectovaginal endometriosis, with good specificity but lower sensitivity for other deep endometriosis locations.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal tenderness-guided ultrasonography in the identification of location of deep endometriosis. METHODS: Consecutive women scheduled for surgery in our Department for clinically suspected endometriosis were included in this prospective study. All women underwent modified transvaginal ultrasonography using a stand-off in the week before surgery, which also evaluated the painful sites evocated by a gentle pressure of the probe. Five locations of deep endometriosis were considered: vaginal walls, rectovaginal septum, rectosigmoid involvement, uterosacral ligaments and anterior compartment (anterior pouch and/or bladder). Sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios (LR+/-) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: We included 88 women; surgery associated with histopathological evaluation revealed deep endometriosis in different pelvic locations in 72 patients. With respect to the vaginal walls, transvaginal ultrasonography had a sensitivity of 91% (95% CI, 79-97%), specificity of 89% (95% CI, 81-93%), an LR+ of 8.2 and an LR- of 0.09. For endometriosis of rectovaginal septum, transvaginal ultrasonography had a sensitivity of 74% (95% CI, 64-80%), specificity of 88% (95% CI, 4-8%), an LR+ of 6.2 and an LR- of 0.3. For other locations, the sensitivity was lower (ranging from 67% to 33%) with a comparable specificity. CONCLUSIONS: This technique shows a high specificity and sensitivity in the detection of vaginal and rectovaginal endometriosis. Good specificity associated with a lower sensitivity was obtained in the diagnosis of deep endometriosis of uterosacral ligaments, rectosigmoid involvement or anterior deep endometriosis.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosischronic_pelvic_painbowel_endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Genital Diseases, Female Pelvic Pain Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color Adult Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Genital Diseases, Female Genital Diseases, Female Humans Middle Aged Pelvic Pain Pelvic Pain Predictive Value of Tests Prospective Studies Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Time Factors Touch

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (26)

Cited by (50)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:14:30.652814+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK