Techniques and Reporting of the Different Imaging Techniques and Classifications: Ultrasonography

In: Imaging of Endometriosis: A Comparative Guide of US, MRI and Surgery · 2025 · pp. 263–269 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-82750-1_14 · W4410897863
book-chapter OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-23

Ultrasonography, primarily transvaginal scanning, systematically evaluates pelvic compartments to identify endometriosis or other causes of pain and subfertility, guiding further patient management.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10 · read from full text

This chapter discusses ultrasonography for diagnosing pelvic pain or subfertility, focusing on systematic transvaginal scanning of multiple pelvic compartments (anterior, posterior, lateral, ovaries, and uterus) to identify endometriosis lesions and adenomyosis. It emphasizes a gentle examination approach to minimize discomfort and improve diagnostic yield, and it describes the kinds of findings that can be assessed (e.g., endometriomas and uterine involvement consistent with adenomyosis). The chapter’s key caveat is that imaging is presented as part of the diagnostic workup with reporting intended to support decisions about further management, without claiming uniform diagnostic performance across all contexts. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it provides a technique-and-reporting framework for ultrasound detection and characterization of endometriosis lesions and related adenomyosis findings.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 4,332 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Ultrasonography is used primarily in the diagnostic workup of patients with pelvic pain or subfertility. It allows a detailed and dynamic evaluation of the pelvis to determine the presence or absence of endometriosis lesions or other possible reasons for the symptoms. A gentle approach in a reassuring environment is essential both for minimizing patients’ discomfort and optimizing the diagnostic yield. The sonographic examination is performed mainly via transvaginal scanning and covers the anterior compartment (e.g., the bladder wall and uterovaginal fold), the posterior compartment (e.g., the rectovaginal septum, uterosacral ligaments, rectosigmoid, and pouch of Douglas), the lateral pelvic compartment (e.g., the ureters and pelvic sidewalls), the ovaries (e.g., endometrioma), the uterus (e.g., adenomyosis), and other possible locations of endometriosis (e.g., the abdominal wall). The systematic ultrasound report should provide enough relevant information for the patient, the clinician, and the surgeon to decide on further management. Access this chapter Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout Purchases are for personal use only Similar content being viewed by others

References

Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Missmer SA. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(13):1244–56. Piketty M, Chopin N, Dousset B, Millischer-Bellaische AE, Roseau G, Leconte M, et al. Preoperative work-up for patients with deeply infiltrating endometriosis: transvaginal ultrasonography must definitely be the first-line imaging examination. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(3):602–7. Van Den Bosch T, Van Schoubroeck D. Ultrasound diagnosis of endometriosis and adenomyosis: state of the art. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;51:16–24. Okaro E, Condous G, Khalid A, Timmerman D, Ameye L, Van Huffel S, et al. The use of ultrasound-based “soft markers” for the prediction of pelvic pathology in women with chronic pelvic pain—can we reduce the need for laparoscopy? BJOG. 2006;113:251. Menakaya U, Reid S, Lu C, Bassem G, Infante F, Condous G. Performance of ultrasound-based endometriosis staging system (UBESS) for predicting level of complexity of laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(6):786–95. Guerriero S, Condous G, Van Den Bosch T, Valentin L, Leone FPG, Van Schoubroeck D, et al. Systematic approach to sonographic evaluation of the pelvis in women with suspected endometriosis, including terms, definitions and measurements: a consensus opinion from the international deep endometriosis analysis (IDEA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(3):318–32. Reid S, Lu C, Casikar I, Reid G, Abbott J, Cario G, et al. Prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration in women with suspected endometriosis using a new real-time dynamic transvaginal ultrasound technique: the sliding sign. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41(6):685–91. Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Gerada M, Virgilio B, Angioni S, Melis GB. Diagnostic value of transvaginal “tenderness-guided” ultrasonography for the prediction of location of deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(11):2452–7. Guerriero S, Condous G, Rolla M, Hudelist G, Ferrero S, Alcazar JL, et al. Addendum to the consensus opinion from the international deep endometriosis analysis (IDEA) group: sonographic evaluation of the parametrium. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024;64:275. Van Holsbeke C, Van Calster B, Guerriero S, Savelli L, Paladini D, Lissoni AA, et al. Endometriomas: their ultrasound characteristics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35(6):730–40. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Editor information Editors and Affiliations Rights and permissions Copyright information © 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG About this chapter Cite this chapter Van den Bosch, T., Bafort, C., Van Schoubroeck, D. (2025). Techniques and Reporting of the Different Imaging Techniques and Classifications: Ultrasonography. In: Thomassin-Naggara, I. (eds) Imaging of Endometriosis: A Comparative Guide of US, MRI and Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-82750-1_14 Download citation DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-82750-1_14 Published: Publisher Name: Springer, Cham Print ISBN: 978-3-031-82749-5 Online ISBN: 978-3-031-82750-1 eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (10)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK