Role of EUS and EUS-guided FNA in the diagnosis of symptomatic rectosigmoid endometriosis

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 32 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-12

This study evaluated the diagnostic utility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) for rectosigmoid endometriosis in symptomatic patients.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BackgroundRectosigmoid endometriosis is an underrecognized cause of GI symptoms in women. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and CT have a low sensitivity in making this diagnosis. The role of EUS and EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA) in the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis in symptomatic patients is not well studied.MethodsA review of medical records identified 5 women who were diagnosed with rectosigmoid endometriosis by EUS and EUS-FNA over a period of 1 year.ObservationsFive women with nonspecific GI complaints underwent EUS examination of a rectosigmoid subepithelial mass found on colonoscopy. EUS revealed a hypoechoic lesion infiltrating the muscularis propria and the serosa of the rectal wall, and extending outside the rectal wall, findings consistent with rectosigmoid endometriosis. This diagnosis was confirmed by EUS-FNA, surgical exploration, and/or the patient's clinical course.ConclusionsEUS and EUS-FNA are noninvasive, sensitive techniques for the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis in symptomatic patients.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endosonography Rectal Diseases Sigmoid Diseases Adult Biopsy, Fine-Needle Biopsy, Fine-Needle Diagnosis, Differential Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Humans Middle Aged Rectal Diseases Rectal Diseases Reproducibility of Results Retrospective Studies Sensitivity and Specificity Sigmoid Diseases Sigmoid Diseases

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (27)

Cited by (32)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-27T06:15:28.040536+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:15:23.967219+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK