Evolutionäre Aspekte in der Pathogenese und Pathophysiologie von Adenomyose und Endometriose

In: Journal für Gynäkologische Endokrinologie/Österreich · 2019 · vol. 29(4) , pp. 110–121 · doi:10.1007/s41974-019-00112-z · W2980518160
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 7 in-corpus citations
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View at publisher → View on OpenAlex
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-09

Endometriosis and adenomyosis, viewed as archimetrosis, are explained by an evolutionary process favoring high uterine contractility for successful reproduction, with hypercontractility in primary dysmenorrhea now reflecting this ancient survival mechanism.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10

The paper develops an evolutionary explanation for adenomyosis and endometriosis, proposing they represent a single disease entity termed archimetrosis based on a long-standing selection process that favored young women with strong, sustained myometrial contractility. It argues that build-up and maintenance of neometrial contractile force enabled successful expulsion of the conceptus and externalization of menstrual debris (including after miscarriage) even under irregular conditions, and that the current high prevalence of primary dysmenorrhea reflects this evolutionary background. As a caveat, it states that in archaic times menstruation was rare, so the hypercontractility associated with primary dysmenorrhea would not have produced rapid destructive effects on uterine structures or negative fertility impacts. This paper is centrally about endometriosis and adenomyosis — it frames both conditions together as archimetrosis tied to uterine peristalsis and evolutionary myometrial hypercontractility.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (47)

Cited by (7)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK