Evidence for the role of multidisciplinary team care in people with pelvic pain and endometriosis: A systematic review

Qing Yi Fang, Campbell N, Nikki Campbell, Samantha Mooney, Sarah J. Holdsworth‐Carson, Kate Tyson
The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2023 · vol. 64(3) , pp. 181–192 · doi:10.1111/ajo.13755 · PMID:37753632 · W4387077916
Systematic review / meta-analysis OA: bronze CC0 ⤵ 26 in-corpus citations
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-06 ⓘ

This systematic review found that multidisciplinary teams including various specialists are commonly used to manage pelvic pain and endometriosis, with patients valuing reliable information and emotional support.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis is a chronic, inflammatory condition characterised by the presence of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterine cavity. Given the multi-system nature of the disease and the potential for significant negative impact on quality of life, there has been a long-standing recognition of the need for multidisciplinary care for people with endometriosis. However, there is paucity to the data supporting this approach, and much of the evidence is anecdotal. AIM: This systematic review aims to describe recent evidence-based models and patient-centred perspectives of multidisciplinary care for endometriosis, to improve understanding of the role of an integrated, multidisciplinary team in effectively addressing patients' care needs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Medline, Embase and Web of Science were searched for relevant articles published between 1 January 2010 to 7 July 2022. RESULTS: Nineteen studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and pinpointed a multidisciplinary team consisting of gynaecologists, pain specialists, nurses, physiotherapists, psychologists, sex therapists, nutritionists, complementary medicine practitioners, and social workers to be most commonly utilised in holistically managing people with pelvic pain and endometriosis. Furthermore, patient perspectives on care highlighted the need for reliable information, respect and validation of experiences or preferences, discussion of long-term treatment plans and social and emotional supports. CONCLUSION: The trend for multidisciplinary team care for people with endometriosis is growing. Further consumer-driven clinical studies and outcome evaluations need to be conducted to determine the effect of multidisciplinary care on improvements to quality of life for people living with endometriosis and or pelvic pain.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosischronic_pelvic_pain

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (43)

Cited by (35)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-09T06:09:53.026058+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-09T06:08:36.739601+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK