Elagolix Treatment for Endometriosis-Associated Pain: Results from a Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 87 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-07

This Phase 2 study found elagolix reduced dysmenorrhea pain versus placebo but not overall pain, with minimal bone density changes.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

This Phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the oral GnRH antagonist elagolix in 155 women with laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis-associated pain, comparing placebo with elagolix 150 mg or 250 mg once daily for 12 weeks (with placebo patients rerandomized to elagolix and original elagolix patients continuing for an additional 12 weeks). At week 12, monthly mean reductions in pain score were greater with elagolix than placebo, but the between-group differences were not statistically significant; dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain scores were reduced, with significant dysmenorrhea differences versus placebo at weeks 8 and 12. Minimal bone mineral density changes were observed. The paper’s key caveat is that the primary efficacy endpoint did not show statistically significant differences versus placebo. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it tests elagolix for endometriosis-associated pain and reports the Phase 2 efficacy and safety outcomes.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 6,303 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

This Phase 2 study evaluated the safety and efficacy of elagolix for treating endometriosis-associated pain. A total of 155 women with laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis were randomized to placebo, elagolix 150 mg, or elagolix 250 mg once daily for 12 weeks. Placebo patients were rerandomized to elagolix and elagolix patients continued their dosing assignment for 12 additional weeks; the primary efficacy measure was changed from baseline in the monthly mean numerical rating scale for pain at week 12. Monthly mean (standard error of the mean) reductions were greater with elagolix versus placebo (−1.19 ± 0.18, −1.25 ± 0.18, and −0.88 ± 0.18 for elagolix 150 mg, 250 mg, and placebo, respectively); differences were not statistically significant. Monthly mean dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain scores were reduced with elagolix, with significant differences for dysmenorrhea at weeks 8 and 12 versus placebo (P <.05). Minimal bone mineral density changes were observed with elagolix treatment. In women with endometriosis-associated pain, elagolix demonstrated an acceptable efficacy and safety profile in this Phase 2 study. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Carr BR. Williams gynecology. In: Schorge JO, Schaffer JI, Halvorson LM, Hoffman B, Bradshaw KD, Cunningham FG, eds. Endometriosis. Chapter 10. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2008. Chapron C, Fauconnier A, Dubuisson JB, Barakat H, Vieira M, Breart G. Deep infiltrating endometriosis: relation between severity of dysmenorrhoea and extent of disease. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(4):760–766. Vercellini P, Fedele L, Aimi G, Pietropaolo G, Consonni D, Crosignani PG. Association between endometriosis stage, lesion type, patient characteristics and severity of pelvic pain symptoms: a multivariate analysis of over 1000 patients. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(1):266–271. Vercellini P, Trespidi L, De Giorgi O, Cortesi I, Parazzini F, Crosignani PG. Endometriosis and pelvic pain: relation to disease stage and localization. Fertil Steril. 1996;65(2):299–304. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology. ACOG Practice bulletin No. 51. chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(3):589–605. Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Treatment of pelvic pain associated with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(suppl 5):S260-S269. Evans S, Moalem-Taylor G, Tracey DJ. Pain and endometriosis. Pain. 2007;132 (suppl 1):S22-S25. Greene R, Stratton P, Cleary SD, Ballweg ML, Sinaii N. Diagnostic experience among 4,334 women reporting surgically diagnosed endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(1):32–39. Kennedy S, Bergqvist A, Chapron C, et al. ESHRE guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(10):2698–2704. Bulun SE, Cheng YH, Pavone ME, et al. Estrogen receptor-beta, estrogen receptor-alpha, and progesterone resistance in endometriosis. Semin Reprod Med. 2010;28(1):36–43. Crosignani PG, Luciano A, Ray A, Bergqvist A. Subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate versus leuprolide acetate in the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(1):248–256. Schlaff WD, Carson SA, Luciano A, Ross D, Bergqvist A. Subcutaneous injection of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate compared with leuprolide acetate in the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(2):314–325. Vercellini P, Fedele L, Pietropaolo G, Frontino G, Somigliana E, Crosignani PG. Progestogens for endometriosis: forward to the past. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9(4):387–396. Batzer FR. GnRH analogs: options for endometriosis-associated pain treatment. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006;13(6):539–545. Olive DL. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(11):1136–1142. Surrey ES. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and add-back therapy: what do the data show? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;22(4):283–288. Fuldeore MJ, Marx SE, Chwalisz K, Smeeding JE, Brook RA. Add-back therapy use and its impact on LA persistence in patients with endometriosis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010;26(3):729–736. Guo SW. Recurrence of endometriosis and its control. Hum Reprod Update. 2009;15(4):441–461. Tandoi I, Somigliana E, Riparini J, Ronzoni S, Vigano P, Candiani M. High rate of endometriosis recurrence in young women. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2011;24(6):376–379. International conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registation of pharmaceuticals for human use. Good Clinical Practice. http://ichgcp.net/. Accessed June 28, 2011. Biberoglu KO, Behrman SJ. Dosage aspects of danazol therapy in endometriosis: short-term and long-term effectiveness. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;139(6):645–654. Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001;94(2):149–158. Jones G, Jenkinson C, Kennedy S. Development of the short form endometriosis health profile questionnaire: the EHP-5. Qual Life Res. 2004;13(3):695–704. Struthers RS, Xie Q, Sullivan SK, et al. Pharmacological characterization of a novel nonpeptide antagonist of the human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor, NBI-42902. Endocrinology. 2007;148(2):857–867. Matsuo H. Prediction of the change in bone mineral density induced by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment for endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(1):149–153. Uemura T, Mohri J, Osada H, Suzuki N, Katagiri N, Minaguchi H. Effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist on the bone mineral density of patients with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 1994;62(2):246–250. Carr B, Chwalisz K, Jimenez R, Burke J, Jiang P, O’Brien C. A novel oral GnRH antagonist, elagolix, is effective for reducing endometriosis-associated pelvic pain: results of a 24-week randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(3):S45. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Diamond, M.P., Carr, B., Dmowski, W.P. et al. Elagolix Treatment for Endometriosis-Associated Pain: Results from a Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Reprod. Sci. 21, 363–371 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719113497292 Published: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719113497292

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

mesh:D004715mesh:D017699endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometriosis Hydrocarbons, Fluorinated Pelvic Pain Pelvic Pain Pyrimidines Adult Double-Blind Method Endometriosis Endometriosis Estradiol Estradiol Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Hydrocarbons, Fluorinated Pelvic Pain Pelvic Pain Pyrimidines

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (27)

Cited by (50)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:18:53.335890+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK