Seven Hormonal Biomarkers for Diagnosing Endometriosis: Meta-Analysis and Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Diagnostic Test Accuracy

review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 10 in-corpus citations
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This meta-analysis evaluated seven hormonal biomarkers for diagnosing endometriosis, comparing their diagnostic accuracy through adjusted indirect comparisons.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Biomarkers Diagnostic Techniques, Endocrine Diagnostic Techniques, Obstetrical and Gynecological Endometriosis Biomarkers Case-Control Studies Cross-Sectional Studies Diagnostic Techniques, Endocrine Diagnostic Techniques, Obstetrical and Gynecological Diagnostic Tests, Routine Diagnostic Tests, Routine Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Hormones Hormones Humans Predictive Value of Tests Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (65)

Cited by (10)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:22:54.901233+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK