Detection of DNA copy number changes in human endometriosis by comparative genomic hybridization

In: Human Genetics · 1999 · vol. 105(5) , pp. 444–451 · doi:10.1007/s004399900174 · W4241301185
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 22 in-corpus citations
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View at publisher → View on OpenAlex
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-09

Comparative genomic hybridization of 18 endometriotic tissues revealed recurrent DNA copy number losses on multiple chromosomes, particularly 1p and 22q, in 15 cases.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10

This study investigated genomic copy number alterations associated with endometriosis by performing comparative genomic hybridization on DNA from 18 manually dissected endometriotic tissue samples, aiming to identify chromosomal gains and losses involved in lesion development. The authors found recurrent copy number losses in 15 of 18 cases, with chromosome 1p and 22q losses each occurring in 50% of cases, plus additional common losses on 5p, 6q, 7p, 9q, 16, and a gain observed on 6q, 7q, and 17q in a subset. CGH findings were validated using dual-color FISH for regions on chromosomes 1, 7, and 22, showing that CGH-detected deletions corresponded to reduced signal proportions relative to centromeric labels. A limitation explicitly reflected in the validation results is that deletions were present in less than 30% of nuclei for cases with CGH loss, indicating mosaicism or partial involvement. This paper is centrally about endometriosis—identifying recurrent DNA copy number losses and gains in endometriotic lesions via CGH and FISH validation.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

Cited by (22)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK