Abstract
Conversion of C 19 steroids to estrogens is catalyzed
by aromatase in human ovary, placenta and
extraglandular tissues such as adipose tissue, skin
and the brain. Aromatase activity is not detectable
in normal endometrium. In contrast, aromatase is
expressed aberrantly in endometriosis and is
stimulated by prostaglandin E
2 (PGE2). This results
in local production of estrogen, which induces
PGE
2 formation and establishes a positive feedback
cycle. Another abnormality in endometriosis, i.e.
deficient hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (17 /afii9826-HSD)
type 2 expression, impairs the inactivation of
estradiol to estrone. These molecular aberrations
collectively favor accumulation of increasing quan-
tities of estradiol and PGE
2 in endometriosis. The
clinical relevance of these findings was exemplified
by the successful treatment of an unusually
aggressive case of postmenopausal endometriosis
using an aromatase inhibitor.
Journal of Molecular Endocrinology (2000) 25, 35–42
Introduction
Endometriosis is a chronic disease manifested by
pelvic pain and infertility and defined as the
presence of endometrial glands and stroma within
the pelvic peritoneum and other extra-uterine sites.
It is estimated to a ffect 2–10% of women in the
reproductive age group (Vessey et al. 1993, Kjerulff
et al. 1996). Endometriosis is viewed to be a
polygenically inherited disease of complex multi-
factorial etiology (Olive & Schwartz 1993).
Sampson’s theory of transplantation of endometrial
tissue on the pelvic peritoneum via retrograde men-
struation is the most widely accepted explanation for
the development of pelvic endometriosis because
of convincing circumstantial and experimental
evidence (Sampson 1927). Since retrograde men-
struation is observed in almost all cycling women,
endometriosis is postulated to develop as a result
of the coexistence of a defect in clearance of the
menstrual e ffl ux from pelvic peritoneal surfaces,
possibly involving the immune system (Halme et al.
1988). Alternatively, intrinsic molecular aberrations
in pelvic endometriotic implants were proposed to
contribute significantly to development of endo-
metriosis. Aberrant expression of aromatase, certain
cytokines and tissue metalloproteinases, deficiency
of 17 /afii9826-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (17 /afii9826-HSD)
type 2 and resistance to the protective action of
progesterone are some of these molecular abnormali-
ties (Khorram et al. 1993, Sharpe-Timms et al. 1995,
Noble et al. 1996, Osteen et al. 1996, Bruner et al.
1997, Zeitoun et al. 1998, 1999). Since endometriosis
is an estrogen-dependent disorder, aromatase ex-
pression and 17 /afii9826-HSD type 2 deficiency are of
paramount importance in the pathophysiology of
endometriosis. In this article, aberrant mechanisms
of estrogen biosynthesis and metabolism in women
with endometriosis are reviewed, with emphasis on
identifying targets for new treatment strategies.
35
Journal of Molecular Endocrinology (2000) 25, 35–42
0952–5041/00/025–035 /p302000 Society for Endocrinology Printed in Great Britain
Online version via http://www.endocrinology.org
Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 06/12/2026 04:02:00PM
via free access
Discussion
Estrogen biosynthesis and metabolism in
humans
The conversion of androstenedione and testosterone
to estrone and estradiol is catalyzed by aromatase,
which is expressed in a number of human tissues
and cells such as ovarian granulosa cells, placental
syncytiotrophoblast, adipose tissue and skin fibro-
blasts, and the brain. In the reproductive-age
woman, the ovary is the most important site of
estrogen biosynthesis, and this takes place in a cyclic
fashion. Upon binding of follicle-stimulating hor-
mone (FSH) to its G-protein-coupled receptor in
the granulosa cell membrane, intracellular cAMP
levels rise and enhance binding of two critical
transcription factors, i.e. steroidogenic factor-1
(SF-1) and cAMP response element binding protein
(CREB), to the classically located proximal pro-
moter II of the aromatase gene (Michael et al. 1995,
1997). This, in turn, activates aromatase expression
and consequently estrogen secretion from the
pre-ovulatory follicle (Simpson et al. 1994, Michael
et al. 1995).
On the other hand, in postmenopausal women,
estrogen formation takes place in extra-ovarian
tissues such as the adipose tissue and skin
(MacDonald et al. 1967, 1978, Ackerman et al.
1981) (Fig. 1). In contrast to cAMP regulation of
aromatase expression in the ovary, this is controlled
primarily by cytokines (IL-6, IL-11, TNF /afii9825) and
glucocorticoids via the alternative use of promoter
I.4 in adipose tissue and skin fibroblasts (Simpson
et al. 1994). The major substrate for aromatase in
adipose tissue and skin is androstenedione of
adrenal origin. In postmenopausal women, approxi-
mately 2% of circulating androstenedione is con-
verted to estrone, which is further converted to
estradiol in these extra-ovarian tissues. This may
give rise to signi ficant serum levels of estradiol
capable of causing endometrial hyperplasia or even
carcinoma (MacDonald et al. 1967, 1978).
Aromatase expression in Müllerian-derived
tissues
Müllerian tissues are known targets of estrogen
action. Until recently, estrogen action has been
classically viewed to occur only via an ‘endocrine’
mechanism: in other words, it was thought that only
circulating estradiol, whether secreted by the ovary
or formed in the adipose tissue, could exert an
estrogenic e ffect after delivery to target tissues via
the bloodstream. Studies on aromatase expression
in breast cancer demonstrated that paracrine
mechanisms play an important role in estrogen
action in this tissue (Bulun et al. 1993a). Estrogen
produced by aromatase activity in breast adipose
tissue fibroblasts was demonstrated to promote the
growth of adjacent malignant breast epithelial cells
(Yue et al. 1998). Finally, we demonstrated an
‘intracrine’ effect of estrogen in uterine leiomyomas
and endometriosis: estrogen produced by aromatase
activity in the cytoplasm of leiomyoma smooth
muscle cells or endometriotic stromal cells can exert
its effects by readily binding to its nuclear receptor
within the same cell (Bulun et al. 1994, Noble et al.
1996, 1997). Disease-free endometrium and myo-
metrium, on the other hand, lack aromatase
expression (Bulun et al. 1993b, Noble et al. 1997).
The significance of aromatase expression in
endometriosis
Among estrogen-responsive pelvic disorders, aro-
matase expression was studied in greatest detail in
endometriosis (Bulun et al. 1993b, Noble et al. 1996,
1997, Zeitoun et al. 1999). Firstly, extremely high
1. Extra-ovarian estrogen formation in women.
Estradiol (E2) in women is either directly secreted by
the ovary or produced in extra-ovarian sites (adipose
tissue and skin). The principal substrate for extra-
ovarian aromatase activity in women is androstenedione
(A) of adrenal and ovarian origins. Androstenedione is
converted by aromatase to estrone (E
1) in adipose tissue
and skin fibroblasts. Estrone is further converted to E 2
by 17/afii9826-HSD type 1 activity in these peripheral tissues.
Thus, extra-ovarian aromatization is the major source
for circulating E
2 in the postmenopausal period or
during ovarian suppression.
and others · Aromatase and endometriosis36
www.endocrinology.orgJournal of Molecular Endocrinology (2000) 25, 35–42
Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 06/12/2026 04:02:00PM
via free access
levels of aromatase mRNA were found in extra-
ovarian endometriotic implants and endometriomas.
Secondly, endometriosis-derived stromal cells in
culture incubated with a cAMP analog displayed
extraordinarily high levels of aromatase activity
comparable to that in placental syncytiotrophoblast
(Noble et al. 1997). These exciting findings led us to
test a battery of growth factors, cytokines and other
substances that might induce aromatase activity via
a cAMP-dependent pathway in endometriosis.
Prostaglandin E
2 (PGE2) was found to be the most
potent known inducer of aromatase activity in
endometriotic stromal cells (Noble et al. 1997). In
fact, this PGE
2 effect was found to be mediated via
the cAMP-inducing EP 2 receptor subtype. More-
over, estrogen was reported to increase PGE 2
formation by stimulating cyclo-oxygenase type
2 (COX-2) enzyme in endometrial stromal cells
in culture (Huang et al. 1996). Thus, a positive
feedback loop for continuous local productions of
estrogen and PGs is established, favoring the
proliferative and in flammatory characteristics of
endometriosis (Fig. 2). Additionally, aromatase
mRNA was also detected in the eutopic endometrial
samples of women with moderate to severe endo-
metriosis (but not in those of disease-free women)
albeit in much smaller quantities compared with
endometriotic implants (Noble et al. 1996). This
may be suggestive of a genetic defect in women with
endometriosis, which is manifested by this subtle
finding in the eutopic endometrium. We propose
that when defective endometrium with low levels of
aberrant aromatase expression reaches the pelvic
peritoneum by retrograde menstruation, it causes an
inflammatory reaction that exponentially increases
local aromatase activity, i.e. estrogen formation,
induced directly or indirectly by PGs and cytokines
(Noble et al. 1997). It would be rather naive to
propose that aberrant aromatase expression is the
only important molecular mechanism in the devel-
opment and growth of pelvic endometriosis. There
may be many other molecular mechanisms that
favor the development of endometriosis: abnormal
expression of proteinase type enzymes that remodel
tissues or their inhibitors (matrix metalloprotein-
ases, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1), certain
cytokines (IL-6, RANTES) and growth factors
(EGF) represent some of mechanisms (Khorram
et al. 1993, Sharpe-Timms et al. 1995, Osteen et al.
1996, Bruner et al. 1997). Alternatively, a defective
immune system that fails to clear peritoneal surfaces
of the retrograde menstrual e ffl ux has been
proposed in the development of endometriosis
(Halme et al. 1988, Hill 1992). The development of
endometriosis in an individual woman probably
requires the coexistence of a threshold number of
these aberrations. Nonetheless, aberrant aromatase
expression is clinically relevant, since aromatase
inhibitors suppress postmenopausal endometriosis
(Takayama et al. 1998).
Regulation of aromatase expression in
endometriotic stromal cells
As emphasized earlier, PGE
2 was found to be the
most potent known inducer of aromatase activity
by increasing cAMP levels via cell surface EP
2
receptors in endometriotic stromal cells (Noble
2. Origin of estrogen in endometriotic lesions:
estradiol (E2) that a ffects an endometriotic lesion arises
from several body sites. In an ovulatory woman, E 2 is
secreted directly from the ovary in a cyclic fashion. In
the early follicular phase and after menopause, extra-
ovarian tissues (adipose and skin) are the most
important sources to account for the circulating E
2.
Estradiol is also produced locally in the endometriotic
implant itself in both ovulatory and postmenopausal
women. The most important precursor, androstenedione
(A) of adrenal and ovarian origins, becomes converted to
estrone (E
1) that is in turn reduced to E 2 in these tissues
and endometriotic implants. We demonstrated
significant levels of 17 /afii9826-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase
type 1 expression in endometriosis, which catalyzes the
conversion of E
1 to E2 (Zeitoun et al. 1998). Estradiol
and cytokines (IL-l /afii9825, TNF/afii9826), which are increased in
endometriosis, induce cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2)
giving rise to elevated concentrations of PGE
2 in this
tissue (Huang et al.). PGE2 in turn, is the most potent
known stimulator of aromatase in endometriotic stromal
cells (Noble et al. 1997). This establishes a positive
feedback loop in favor of continuous estrogen formation
in endometriosis.
Aromatase and endometriosis · and others
37
www.endocrinology.org Journal of Molecular Endocrinology (2000) 25, 35–42
Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 06/12/2026 04:02:00PM
via free access
et al. 1997). On the other hand, neither cAMP
analogs nor PGE 2 was capable of stimulating any
detectable aromatase activity in eutopic endometrial
stromal cells in culture. The obvious question
became: what are the molecular differences that give
rise to aromatase expression in endometriosis and
its inhibition in eutopic endometrium? To address
this, we first determined that the cAMP-inducible
promoter II was used for in vivo aromatase
expression in endometriotic tissue (Zeitoun et al.
1999). Then, a stimulatory transcription factor,
SF-1, and an inhibitory factor, chicken ovalbumin
upstream promoter transcription factor (COUP-
TF), were found to compete for the same binding
site in aromatase promoter II. COUP-TF was
ubiquitously expressed in both eutopic endo-
metrium and endometriosis, whereas SF-1 was
expressed, speci fically in endometriosis but not in
eutopic endometrium, and binds to aromatase
promoter more avidly than COUP-TF (Zeitoun
et al. 1999). Thus, SF-1 and other transcription
factors (e.g. CREB) activate transcription in
endometriosis, whereas COUP-TF, which occupies
the same DNA site in eutopic endometrium,
inhibits this process (Zeitoun et al. 1999) (Fig. 3).
In summary, one of the molecular alterations
leading to local aromatase expression in endo-
metriosis but not in normal endometrium is the
aberrant production of SF-1 in endometriotic
stromal cells, which overcomes the protective
inhibition maintained normally by COUP-TF in
the eutopic endometrium.
Interconversions of estrone and estradiol in
endometriosis
The primary substrate for aromatase activity in
endometriosis is androstenedione of adrenal and
ovarian origins in premenopausal women. The
major product of aromatase activity in endometri-
osis, namely estrone, is only weakly estrogenic and
must be converted to the potent estrogen estradiol
to exert a full estrogenic e ffect. We demonstrated
that the enzyme 17 /afii9826-HSD type 1, which catalyzes
the conversion of estrone to estradiol, is expressed
in endometriosis (Andersson & Moghrabi 1997,
Zeitoun et al. 1998). In contrast, the enzyme
17/afii9826-HSD type 2 (encoded by a separate gene)
3. Proposed mechanism of regulation of aromatase (P450arom)
expression by SF-1 and CREB in endometriosis. Upon binding of PGE 2 to
its cell surface EP 2 receptor, intracellular cAMP levels increase. This gives
rise to binding of cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) and SF-1
to specific motifs upstream of aromatase promoter II. The stimulatory type
transcription factor SF-1 binds as a monomer to a nuclear receptor half-site
with a higher a ffi nity compared with that of the inhibitory factor COUP-TF
(not shown in the figure), which binds to the same site relatively loosely as a
dimer. SF-1 then synergizes with CREB (bound to upstream CRE) and
possibly other factors to activate transcription of the P450arom gene in
response to cAMP (Zeitoun et al. 1999).
and others · Aromatase and endometriosis
38
www.endocrinology.orgJournal of Molecular Endocrinology (2000) 25, 35–42
Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 06/12/2026 04:02:00PM
via free access
inactivates estradiol by catalyzing its conversion to
estrone in eutopic endometrial glandular cells
during the luteal phase (Andersson & Moghrabi
1997). Progesterone actually induces the activity of
this enzyme in endometrial glandular cells in
culture, making inactivation of estradiol to estrone
one of the anti-estrogenic properties of progesterone
(Satyaswaroop et al. 1982). The expression of
17/afii9826-HSD type 2 is absent from endometriotic
glandular cells, as demonstrated in paired samples
of eutopic endometrium and pelvic endometriosis
obtained simultaneously during the luteal phase
(Zeitoun et al. 1998). Consequently, this protective
mechanism that lowers estradiol levels is lost in
endometriotic tissue (Zeitoun et al. 1998). The
aberrant expression of aromatase, the presence of
17/afii9826-HSD type 1 and the absence of 17 /afii9826-HSD type
2 from endometriosis collectively give rise to
elevated local levels of estradiol compared with
eutopic endometrium. Additionally, 17 /afii9826-HSD type
2d eficiency may also be viewed as a defective action
of progesterone, which fails to induce this enzyme
in endometriotic tissue (Fig. 4).
Rationale for using aromatase inhibitors to
treat endometriosis
Endometriosis is successfully suppressed by estro-
gen deprivation with GnRH analogs or the
induction of surgical menopause. Control of pelvic
pain with GnRH agonists is usually successful
during and immediately after the treatment,
whereas pain associated with endometriosis returns
in up to 75% of these women (Henzl et al. 1988,
Waller & Shaw 1993). There may be multiple
reasons for the failure of GnRH agonist treatment
of endometriosis. One likely explanation is the
presence of signi ficant estradiol production that
continues in the adipose tissue, skin and endometri-
otic implant per se during the GnRH agonist
treatment. Therefore, blockage of aromatase activity
in these extra-ovarian sites with an aromatase
inhibitor may keep larger number of patients in
remission for longer periods of time (Fig. 5). The
most striking evidence for the signi ficance of
extra-ovarian estrogen production is the recurrence
of endometriosis after successfully completed hys-
terectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in a
4. Defective inactivation of estradiol (E 2) in endometriosis: E 2
reaches the endometriotic lesions via the blood stream. Additionally, estrone
(E1) is produced in the stromal cell via aberrant aromatase activity. Estrone is
further reduced to E 2 by 17/afii9826-HSD type 1 in the endometriotic tissue.
Estradiol is normally inactivated by conversion to E 1 by 17/afii9826-HSD type 2 in
epithelial cells of the eutopic endometrium in response to progesterone
during the secretory phase. In endometriotic tissue, however, E
2 is not
metabolized owing to the lack of 17 /afii9826-HSD type 2, giving rise to increased
local concentration of this potent estrogen. The absence of 17 /afii9826-HSD type 2
expression in endometriosis despite high levels of progesterone during the
secretory phase is indicative of selective progesterone resistance in this tissue.
Aromatase and endometriosis · and others
39
www.endocrinology.org Journal of Molecular Endocrinology (2000) 25, 35–42
Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 06/12/2026 04:02:00PM
via free access
number of women (Metzger et al. 1991, Takayama
et al. 1998). Endometriotic tissue in one such
aggressive case was found to express much higher
levels of aromatase mRNA compared with pre-
menopausal endometriosis (Takayama et al. 1998).
We recently reported the treatment of a 57-year-old
overweight woman who had recurrence of severe
endometriosis after hysterectomy and bilateral
salpingo-oophorectomy. Two additional laparoto-
mies were performed owing to persistent severe
pelvic pain and bilateral ureteral obstruction leading
to left renal atrophy and right hydronephrosis.
Treatment with megestrol acetate was ine ffective. A
large (3 cm) vaginal endometriotic lesion contained
unusually high levels of aromatase mRNA. The
patient was given anastrozole (an aromatase in-
hibitor) for 9 months. Despite the addition of
calcium and alendronate (a nonsteroidal inhibitor
of bone resorption), bone density in the lumbar
spine decreased by 6 ·2%. The occurrence of
significant bone loss in this particular case should
be studied further. Dramatic relief of the pain
and regression of the vaginal endometriotic lesion
were observed within the first month of treatment.
At the same time, circulating estradiol levels were
reduced to 50% of the baseline value. Markedly
high pretreatment levels of aromatase mRNA in
the endometriotic tissue became undetectable in
a repeat biopsy 6 months later, and the lesion
nearly disappeared after 9 months of therapy.
Two potential mechanisms may have accounted
for this strikingly successful result. Firstly, there
was evidence of suppression of extra-ovarian (i.e.
skin and adipose tissue) aromatase activity, giving
rise to a signi ficant decrease in serum estradiol
level (Fig. 5). Secondly, unusually high levels of
aromatase expression in the endometriotic lesion
disappeared after treatment with the aromatase
inhibitor, anastrozole (Fig. 5). Besides the
expected direct inhibition of aromatase activity
in endometriosis by anastrozole, the disappear-
ance of aromatase mRNA expression in the lesion
may be explicable by denial of estrogen that is
known to stimulate local biosynthesis of PGE
2,
which, in turn, stimulates aromatase expression
(Fig. 2).
In summary, the recently developed potent
aromatase inhibitors are candidate drugs in the
treatment of endometriosis that is resistant to
standard regimens. In fact, the use of aromatase
inhibitors may be the only available treatment
for aggressive postmenopausal endometriosis. It
remains to be seen whether aromatase inhibitors
alone or together with present lines of therapy in
premenopausal women will increase the pain-free
interval and time to recurrence after discontinuation
(Fig. 5). Studies are under way to address these
questions.
5. Sites of action of aromatase inhibitors to treat endometriosis. In
cases resistant to treatment with GnRH agonists or in postmenopausal
endometriosis, the use of aromatase inhibitors to block estrogen formation in
the skin and adipose tissue as well as in endometriotic tissue may be critical
in inhibiting the growth of endometriotic tissue. Recurrent endometriosis,
especially after surgical removal of the ovaries, may represent lesions that are
sensitive to extremely low levels of estradiol (E
2). Thus, suppression of E 2
production in the extra-ovarian sites (adipose tissue/skin) and in
endometriotic tissue may be mandatory for successful treatment of
endometriosis.
and others · Aromatase and endometriosis
40
www.endocrinology.orgJournal of Molecular Endocrinology (2000) 25, 35–42
Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 06/12/2026 04:02:00PM
via free access
SUMMARY
The development and growth of endometriotic
lesions are estrogen-dependent. The mechanisms
and e ffectiveness of hormonal treatments for
endometriosis should be re-evaluated in view of the
new advances that increased our understanding of
the body sites of estrogen production in a woman
with endometriosis. In addition to ovarian secre-
tion, estradiol is also produced in peripheral sites
such as skin, adipose tissue and endometriotic
lesions per se . We suggest that the intracrine and
paracrine effects of estradiol produced in the target
tissue amplify the estrogenic action of steroid
hormones delivered via the circulation. Addition-
ally, defective inactivation of estradiol in endo-
metriosis in contrast to eutopic endometrium may
further enhance this local effect. Aberrant aromatase
activity and defective estradiol metabolism in
endometriosis are consequences of speci fic molecu-
lar aberrations such as inappropriate expression of
a stimulatory transcription factor or progester-
one resistance in this tissue. The clinical relevance
of these findings was recently exempli fied by the
successful treatment of a severe case of recurrent
postmenopausal endometriosis with an aromatase
inhibitor. Future treatment strategies may be
designed to target the signal transduction for
aromatase expression in endometriosis or to
enhance progesterone action in this tissue.
References
Ackerman GE, Smith ME, Mendelson CR, MacDonald PC &
Simpson ER 1981 Aromatization of androstenedione by
human adipose tissue stromal cells in monolayer culture.
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 53 412–417.
Andersson S & Moghrabi N 1997 Physiology and molecular
genetics of 17 /afii9826-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases. Steroids 62
143–147.
Bruner KL, Matrisian LM, Rodgers WH, Gorstein F &
Osteen KG 1997 Suppression of matrix metalloproteinases
inhibits establishment of ectopic lesions by human
endometrium in nude mice. Journal of Clinical Investigation
99 2851–2857.
Bulun SE, Mahendroo MS & Simpson ER 1993 a Polymerase
chain reaction ampli fication fails to detect aromatase
cytochrome P450 transcripts in normal human endometrium
or decidua. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
76 1458–1463.
Bulun SE, Price TM, Mahendroo MS, Aitke nJ&S i m p s o n
ER 1993b A link between breast cancer and local estrogen
biosynthesis suggested by quanti fication of breast adipose
tissue aromatase cytochrome P450 transcripts using
competitive polymerase chain reaction after reverse
transcription. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and
Metabolism 77 1622–1628.
Bulun SE, Simpson ER & Word RA 1994 Expression of the
CYP19 gene and its product aromatase cytochrome P450 in
human leiomyoma tissues and cells in culture. Journal of
Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 78 736–743.
H a l m eJ ,W h i t eC ,K a u m aS ,E s t e sJ&H a s k i l lS1 9 8 8
Peritoneal macrophages from patients with endometriosis
release growth factor activity in vitro. Journal of Clinical
Endocrinology and Metabolism 66 1044–1049.
Henzl MR, Corson SL, Moghissi K, Buttram VC, Berqvist C
& Jacobson J 1988 Administration of nasal nafarelin as
compared with oral danazol for endometriosis. New England
Journal of Medicine 318 485–489.
Hill JA 1992 Immunology and endometriosis. Fertility and
Sterility 58 262–264.
Huang JC, Dawood MY & Wu KK 1996 Regulation of
cyclooxygenase-2 gene in cultured endometrial stromal cells
by sex steroids. Proceedings of the American Society of
Reproductive Medicine Meeting S5 (abstract).
Khorram O, Taylor RN, Ryan IP, Schall TJ & Landers DV
1993 Peritoneal fluid concentrations of the cytokine
RANTES correlate with the severity of endometriosis .
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 169
1545–1549.
Kjerulff KH, Erickson BA & Langenberg PW 1996 Chronic
gynecological conditions reported by US women: findings
from the National Health Information Survey 1984 to 1992.
American Journal of Public Health 86 195–199.
MacDonald PC, Rombaut RP & Siiteri PK 1967 Plasma
precursors of estrogen I. Extent of conversion of plasma
/afii9797
4-androstenedione to estrone in normal males and
non-pregnant normal, castrate and adrenalectomized females .
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 27
1103–1111.
MacDonald PC, Edman CD, Hemsell DL, Porte rJ&S iiteri
PK 1978 E ffect of obesity on conversion of plasma
androstenedione to estrone in postmenopausal women with
and without endometrial cancer. American Journal of
Obstetrics and Gynecology 130 448–455.
Metzger DA, Lessey BA, Soper JT, McCarty KS, Jr & Haney
AF 1991 Hormone-resistant endometriosis following
total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-
oophorectomy: correlation with histology and steroid
receptor content. Obstetrics and Gynecology 78 946–950.
Michael MD, Kilgore MW, Morohashi KI & Simpson ER
1995 Ad4 BP/SF-1 regulates cyclic AMP-induced
transcription from the proximal promoter (PII) of the human
aromatase P450 (CYP19) gene in the ovary. Journal of
Biological Chemistry 270 13561–13566.
Michael MD, Michael LF & Simpson ER 1997 A CRE-like
sequence that binds CREB and contributes to cAMP-
dependent regulation of the proximal promoter of the human
aromatase P450 (CYP19) gene. Molecular and Cellular
Endocrinology 134 147–156.
Noble LS, Simpson ER, John s A & Bulun SE 1996 Aromatase
expression in endometriosis . Journal of Clinical Endocrinology
and Metabolism 81 174–179.
Noble LS, Takayama K, Putman JM, Johns DA, Hinshelwood
MM, Agarwal VR, Zhao Y, Carr BR & Bulun SE 1997
Prostaglandin E
2 stimulates aromatase expression in
endometriosis-derived stromal cells. Journal of Clinical
Endocrinology and Metabolism 82 600–606.
Aromatase and endometriosis · and others 41
www.endocrinology.org Journal of Molecular Endocrinology (2000) 25, 35–42
Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 06/12/2026 04:02:00PM
via free access
Olive DL & Schwartz LB 1993 Endometriosis. New England
Journal of Medicine 328 1759–1769.
Osteen KG, Bruner KL & Sharpe-Timms KL 1996 Steroid
and growth factor regulation of matrix metalloproteinase
expression and endometriosis. Seminars in Reproductive
Endocrinology 15 301–308.
Sampson JA 1927 Peritoneal endometriosis due to the
menstrual dissemination of endometrial tissue into the
peritoneal cavity. American Journal of Obstetrics and
Gynecology 14 422–425.
Satyaswaroop PG, Wartell DJ & Mortel R 1982 Distribution
of progesterone receptor, estradiol dehydrogenase, and 20 /afii9825-
dihydroprogesterone dehydrogenase activities in human
endometrial glands and stroma: progestin induction of
steroid dehydrogenase activities in vitro is restricted to the
glandular epithelium. Endocrinology 111 743–749.
Sharpe-Timms KL, Penney LL, Zimmer RL, Wright JA,
Zhang Y & Surewicz K 1995 Partial puri fication and amino
acid sequence analysis of endometriosis protein-II (ENDO-II)
reveals homology with tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1
(TIMP-1). Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 80
3784–3787.
Simpson ER, Mahendroo MS, Means GD, Kilgore MW,
Hinshelwood MM, Graham-Lorence S, Amarneh B, Ito Y,
Fisher CR, Michael MD, Mendelson CR & Bulun SE 1994
Aromatase cytochrome P450, the enzyme responsible for
estrogen biosynthesis. Endocrine Reviews 15 342–355.
Takayama K, Zeitoun K, Gunby RT, Sasano H, Carr BR &
Bulun SE 1998 Treatment of severe postmenopausal
endometriosis with an aromatase inhibitor. Fertility and
Sterility 69 709–713.
Vessey MP, Villard-Mackintos hL&P a i n t e rR1993
Epidemiology of endometriosis in women attending family
planning clinics. British Medical Journal 306 182–184.
Waller KG & Shaw RW 1993 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone
analogues for the treatment of endometriosis: long-term
follow-up. Fertility and Sterility 59 511–515.
Yue W, Wang JP, Hamilton CJ, Demers LM & Santen RJ
1998 In situ aromatization enhances breast tumor estradiol
levels and cellular proliferation. Cancer Research 58
927–932.
Zeitoun K, Takayama K, Sasano H, Suzuki T, Moghrabi N,
Andersson S, Johns A, Meng L, Putman M, Car r B & Bulun
SE 1998 De ficient 17/afii9826-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2
expression in endometriosis: failure to metabolize estradiol-17/afii9826.
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 83 4474–4480.
Zeitoun K, Takayama K, Michael MD & Bulun SE 1999
Stimulation of aromatase P450 promoter (II) activity in
endometriosis and its inhibition in endometrium are
regulated by competitive binding of SF-1 and COUP-TF to
the same cis-acting element. Molecular Endocrinology 13
239–253.
17 December 1999
and others · Aromatase and endometriosis42
www.endocrinology.orgJournal of Molecular Endocrinology (2000) 25, 35–42
Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 06/12/2026 04:02:00PM
via free access